Foreword:Art during the mid-twentieth century contained some of the most of import alterations art history.
These explosive times were counter-balanced with explosive popular civilization. More historical events, disconnected alterations, and turbulency occurred from the terminal of World War II until the tallness of the Vietnam War than in any clip period. Before this clip, manners of art had lasted coevalss. In the 1960 & # 8217 ; s legion of import art motions were go oning at the same clip. There were fluctuations on fluctuations, motions inside of other motions. Therefore, because of the sum of independent and incorporate pieces of motions and manners, a batch can be missed in a short paper.
The sum that happened in these 25 old ages is adequate to make full volumes, and so, this is merely a brief grating off the top of what during these times & # 8212 ; the most disruptive times in American History.Introduction:The 1940 & # 8217 ; s through the 1960 & # 8217 ; s were non merely some of the most socially and politically volatile times in American History, but were the accelerator for the legion alterations in which occurred in American Popular civilization during these and following old ages. Alternatively of sing the injury which resulted after World War I & # 8217 ; s terminal, post-World War II United States returned reasonably easy back to mundane life. Although there were some jobs change overing from a wartime to a peacetime economic system in the late 1940 & # 8217 ; s, Americans took on the undertaking and entered the 1950 & # 8217 ; s on a really auspicious high note. During the clip period after World War II, the United States experienced many alterations. Technology was abundant and the rate at which new innovations, industries and engineerings came approximately was at a rate ne’er seen earlier. From a telecasting in every place to the first computing machines and finally infinite flight, these two decennaries after World War II were crowded with promotions. Some of the most dramatic alterations came in the field of art.
What was one time a individual, slow route of popular civilization promotion branched off into 1000s of smaller, faster altering roads. Some of these & # 8220 ; roads & # 8221 ; , which can be seen as altering manners, or motions, in art, whipped Americans through a roller coaster of alteration in what they saw around them.The End of World War II:The major art motion taking topographic point in the United States straight after World War II was abstract expressionism. The abstract expressionist motion & # 8220 ; devoted itself to the rules that art is most expressive when a relationship is established between the creative person and the witness & # 8221 ; . For the most portion, abstract expressionism attracted the American populace with its simple methods and self-generated visual aspect and more so because it was an entirely American art motion.
With most of Europe at war and in recovery during the 1940 & # 8217 ; s, Americans were left with the chief duty of developing art. Abstract expressionism was, hence, the first motion to arise in the United States. During the war in the times of pandemonium that existed in the universe, America met the challenge of being the leader in art and developing their ain motion which would cross the 1940 & # 8217 ; s and the 1950 & # 8217 ; s.One of the most of import creative persons in abstract expressionism was Jackson Pollack ( see appendix A ) .
Pollack & # 8217 ; s work tallies throughout the span of the motion. The celebrated method of & # 8220 ; action painting & # 8221 ; which Pollack developed was much like the times he, and the other creative persons who practiced this method, lived in. & # 8220 ; While there appears to be chaos in the fickle and loose arrangement of pigment and shots, there is still a great sense of the pieces being defined and controlled & # 8221 ; . The abstract expressionists thought of their pictures as life things. In Jackson Pollack & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; My Painting & # 8221 ; , from 1947, he says, & # 8220 ; The beginning of my picture is the unconscious & # 8221 ; . The universe around Pollack and all universe citizens at this point was helter-skelter & # 8212 ; communism was running rampant, war had ripped throughout Europe, the atomic bomb had been dropped on Hiroshima. Yet, in this apparently helter-skelter and unmanageable universe, these creative persons were seeking to make off from life and towards the unconscious to command and to specify, non destruct and slaughter like the Cold War had. The abstract expressionists saw their & # 8220 ; representations of pictures as uninterrupted beings, non simply an object left to hang on the wall, but as a life entity that continues in gesture & # 8221 ; .
abstract expressionism dominated the art community for about two decennaries and remained based in America.In some ways, abstract expressionism & # 8220 ; worked to restore art to its truest significance & # 8212 ; the being of art in relation to the creative persons, and its eventual impact on society & # 8221 ; . On the other manus, the motions that began to blend on the tail terminal of abstract expressionism were focused at an opposite end. Alternatively of utilizing art to make popular civilization, creative persons would, every bit early as the beginning of the 1950 & # 8217 ; s, use popular civilization to make art.The 1950 & # 8217 ; s:The 1950 & # 8217 ; s were a clip of great strife in the United States. McCarthyism ran rampant throughout the state and earnestly crippled the every twenty-four hours lives of Americans. Civil rights began to look as a major issue in all American & # 8217 ; s lives as schools began to incorporate black and white pupils and Rosa Parks sat on the coach where she was non permitted to in Montgomery, Alabama. While the other major mediums of popular civilization involved themselves profoundly in American political relations, on the other manus, popular art stayed largely as it was.
Pollack, along with other abstract expressionists such as William DeKooning and Mark Rothko ( see appendix B ) , continued to research their field with action picture, abstractions and color-field picture, severally. Abstract expressionism dominated the art universe of the late 1940 & # 8217 ; s and 50 & # 8217 ; s. Yet as the 1950 & # 8217 ; s peaked, a new manner of art began to look in the art community.For the first few old ages of its being, and particularly in New York, the new & # 8220 ; Pop Art & # 8221 ; motion went comparatively unnoticed.
The eventual acknowledgment of Pop Art as a motion took the bulk of the 1950 & # 8217 ; s but early Pop art was really interesting and alone to the art universe. & # 8220 ; When Pop art was recognized as a shared phenomenon, there was vacillation as to what to name it & # 8221 ; . & # 8220 ; Some suggested New Realism based on an analogy between Gallic and American motions & # 8221 ; promoted by Pierre Restany. Others suggested Anti-Sensibility Painting but people discredited this name because it & # 8220 ; jumped the gun & # 8221 ; ; The bulk of people thought that it was merely thought of as Anti-Sensible because it was new and unfamiliar. A 3rd name was Common Object Art, the closest suggestion to the ulterior name of Pop art, and was used because this new art contained chiefly platitude, mundane objects, people, and topographic points & # 8212 ; objects from Popular civilization. Finally the name & # 8220 ; Pop art & # 8221 ; came along and stuck, it being perfect for this new admiration. The major dad creative persons of the 1950 & # 8217 ; s, such as Jasper Johns ( see appendix C ) and Robert Rauchenberg ( see appendix D ) , took their images from mundane life. Johns painted the American flag and map every bit good as words, Numberss and letters.
Rauchenberg & # 8217 ; s pieces contained reproductions of familiar people, topographic points and objects, and created & # 8220 ; combine-paintings & # 8221 ; from pigment, silk-screens, prints, three dimensional sculpture, and collaged paper. Their pictures were still somewhat abstract expressionist and stayed off from political relations. From about 1955 until 1960, Jasper Johns and Robert Rauchenberg shared a studio and were the first and best audience for each other & # 8217 ; s art. While their art is different, upon looking back at it, both Johns & # 8217 ; and Rauchenberg & # 8217 ; s art had & # 8220 ; a sort of proto-Pop art distinction & # 8221 ; .Rauchenberg trades, so, with a profuseness of objects and events that he can accept with in a capacious aesthetic. Johns on the contrary, does non take an optimistic pleasance in the connectivity that random events generate & # 8230 ; If Rauchenberg is the type of creative person as radio detection and ranging operator, Johns is the creative person as textual bookman, measuring undependable symbols.
Both Johns and Rauchenberg were forerunners of the new art motion to come. As early Pop creative persons, they introduced the universe to a new manner of art, playing off abstract expressionism and looking towards the hereafter.The 1960 & # 8217 ; s:During the early1960 & # 8217 ; s, art began to ooze more and more into popular civilization and expand into itself become a medium of huge difference. The 1960 & # 8217 ; s were the most dynamic of the decennaries. Popular civilization has its ain art motion at this point and there were more and more new creative persons fall ining its ranks everyday. Not merely was Pop art looking more often as a new art motion, but other motions were being seen more frequently such as Minimalism, Optical Art, Post-Pop and Photo-Realism, every bit good as Conceptual Art.Pop ArtMost noticed during the early to mid 1960 & # 8217 ; s was the Pop Art motion. These times can be summed up as times during which the full state was & # 8220 ; sing a new cultural rousing mobilized by President John F.
Kennedy & # 8217 ; s announcement of a & # 8216 ; New Frontier & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; . The American Pop Art motion was centered in New York City during this clip period. & # 8220 ; New York Pop included an enriching narrative of wit combined with civilization & # 8221 ; much unlike American Pop Art & # 8217 ; s cousin British Pop Art whose intent was entirely to undo the work of the abstract expressionists. The New York Pop creative persons besides & # 8220 ; represented the fulfilment of the American thought of mass-production & # 8221 ; These new creative persons embarked on a manner that did non restrict them, but instead allowed them to research the freest signifiers of their originative heads.Their manners, if one can be defined, all employed different elements,devices and significances. They offered new graphics that was closely associated with the civilization of the 2nd half of the twentieth century. They portrayed graphics through a assortment of methods that differed from the ordinary picture or sculpture & # 8212 ; including commercial, amusing strip, and nutrient sculptures.
They aimed to depersonalise art, taking such elements as people, and sometimes concentrating on engineering or mechanisation.By and large, non one painter in the field of Pop Art was making the same things as one of his or her opposite numbers. Yet, one of the major beliefs that ran through Pop Art was that all art is similar. All facets of modern civilization had similarities whether it was a telecasting, assembly line, commercial or individual. They used any objects, magazines, nutrient, newspaper illustrations, vesture, furniture, autos and even sketchs as portion of their theories on art. During this clip, Jasper Johns and Robert Rauchenberg continued to research the field of Pop Art, every bit good as many other newer creative persons such as Roy Lichtenstien and Andy Warhol.One of the most outstanding painters of the Pop Art motion was Andy Warhol ( see appendix E ) . Andy Warhol began his calling as a commercial in writing creative person and worked straight in the field of Pop civilization.
After the 1950 & # 8217 ; s ended, Warhol moved into Pop art and out of Pop civilization, taking with him legion alone influences. Unlike Rauchenberg and Johns, Warhol & # 8217 ; s topics were non anon. or symbolic. Warhol dug straight into the bosom of pop civilization and focused on transcripts of magazine ads, merchandises found in the food market shop such as Campbell & # 8217 ; s Soup, and celebrated film stars and icons such as Marilyn Monroe, Elizabeth Taylor, and Jackie Kennedy. Warhol & # 8217 ; s art was free from aestheticism whatsoever.
Warhol & # 8217 ; s pictures were mass produced on silk screens at his studio competently named & # 8220 ; The Factory & # 8221 ; . He showed that art is nil more than what one makes of it and that it can be found everyplace. Roy Lichtenstien ( see appendix F ) , another creative person of this same period, felt the same manner about art. One major difference between Warhol and Lichtenstien is that Lichtenstien focused on one major topic: amusing strips. Lichtenstien, like the others, took something found in every twenty-four hours civilization and created something new with it and something that works on many degrees. In a 1963 interview with Gene R. Swenson, when asked if he thought Pop art was & # 8220 ; ugly & # 8221 ; Lichtenstien summed up Pop art overall:& # 8230 ; It is an engagement with what I think to be the most audacious and endangering features of our civilization, things we hate, but which are besides powerful in their encroachment on us. I think art since C? zanne has become highly romantic and unrealistic, feeding on art…It has had less and less to make with the world…Outside is the universe ; it’s there.
Pop art looks out into the universe ; it appears to demur its environment…And that was precisely what Lichtenstein & # 8217 ; s, every bit good as all the other & # 8217 ; s, art was making. Taking the universe and doing it art. Along with Rauchenberg, Johns, James Rosenquist, Claes Oldenberg, and Warhol, Lichtenstien laid the foundation for the hereafter of art.Pop art, unlike some other art motions, explored new art patterns that allowed them to ask into how art can differ from the more everyday abstract. At the clip, people chiefly enjoyed Pop art because of its connectivity from humanity to civilization.
Yet, today, the deductions and hypotheses of Pop art have left an unprecedented impact on the art universe.Post-Pop and Photo-RealismThe ulterior period of Pop-Art remained similar to what had been go oning before. Painters like Ed Ruscha ( see appendix G ) still based their art on common things and basic signifiers.
Yet, easy, as we came closer to the terminal of the 1960 & # 8217 ; s, a unusual happening began to go on in the art universe. A new popular signifier of art was photo-realism. Photo-realism & # 8217 ; s roots grew out of Pop art by taking the images seen from the mundane universe. Artists like Richard Estes ( see appendix H ) painted scenes of metropoliss, diners, and drive thrus while Chuck Close ( appendix H ) painted such realistic ego portrayals that they were virtually impossible to state from a exposure. These pictures did non hold any emotion and were cold but the truth was impossible to acquire off from, it made them intriguing.
The chief end of photo-realism was to destruct wholly what was one time abstract or expressionist art. By making this, there was the possibility of turning art a wholly new way & # 8212 ; towards a non-abstractionist hereafter.Op ArtThe Op ( Optical ) Art motion was a really short motion taking topographic point after Pop art, from 1964 until 1967. & # 8220 ; Op Art began with the desire to affect a correlativity between seeing and understanding & # 8221 ; . The birth of Op Art came along when an article in Time Magazine in 1964 called a new art motion, where creative persons focus on oculus use, & # 8220 ; Op Art & # 8221 ; .
The creative persons of the motion such as Bridget Riley ( see appendix I ) thought that their motion was one based on the oculus and that the oculus was the most of import tool for detecting and understanding art. One of the major ends of Op Art was to flim-flam the encephalon and the oculus & # 8212 ; to do them construe information otherwise. Like all other optical semblances, the Op creative persons would make images that did non truly be by utilizing line and contrasting colour. In Bridget Riley & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; Current & # 8221 ; , when one walks towards or off from the image, it appears to travel. Op art went beyond Pop Art to make a manufactured expression by extinguishing pigment and coppices wholly and utilizing machines alternatively. These creative persons wanted to demo how a apparently empty and nonmeaningful image could still capture the emotions of the spectator.
& # 8220 ; Op art has represented an geographic expedition to understanding how adult male uses his eyes to construe and absorb information & # 8221 ; . What makes Op Art stand out as an of import motion is that it made art into something that uses understanding every bit much as seeing. With Op Art, art became an experience.MinimalismMinimalism was another short motion taking topographic point in the late 1960 & # 8217 ; s, chiefly in sculpture.
This motion received the most unfavorable judgment from the populace because no 1 understood how rows of rectangles or meshing regular hexahedrons were genuinely art. Yet, even though other creative persons thought their art should hold some aesthetics, the Minimalists merely wanted to portray their sculpture in a clear manner. They used found objects like Styrofoam, wood, and fluorescent visible radiations. Artists like Don Judd, Dan Flavin, and Frank Stella were the & # 8220 ; choose few & # 8221 ; that were deemed the Minimalist creative persons in this clip period. Whether they were painting chevrons like Stella or making sculpture from light bulbs like Flavin ( see appendix J ) , they were directed towards the same thought: the thought of order. Minimalism was an of import motion because of how antithetical it was compared to old motions.
Unlike the abstract expressionists, all thoughts of emotion and feeling were removed from the piece. Minimalists besides went beyond the Pop creative persons by taking the easy recognizable images of mundane things and cut downing them to basic signifiers. Another of import function which Minimalism played its influence on a undermentioned and even more abstract motion: Conceptual Art.Conceptual ArtConceptual Art is one of the most puzzling motions in art. It is non based on existent art but instead on an thought or construct. The sire of Conceptual Art was Dadaist, Marcel Duchamp.
Duchamp & # 8217 ; s doctrine was & # 8220 ; that every graphics & # 8217 ; s thought was more of import than its merchandise & # 8221 ; They eliminated every object from the art itself being left with merely an thought. If the thought was executed, it would merely be executed with the necessary objects or even less artistically, words. Rather than pigment and canvas, the Conceptual creative person created books full of their thoughts. The Conceptual creative persons purpose was to fascinate, daze, amuse, evoke some kind of emotion, and sometimes even anger the spectator. Conceptual art was a motion created more for the Godhead than the spectator.
It allowed the creative person to be wholly free and able to show with out any restrictions what so of all time. And with the tallness of freedom which existed during this clip period, Conceptual Art officially ends the definable epoch of Modern Art.Art As Adversary PoliticssWhile much of the art of this clip period stayed off from political relations, there were still many creative persons who dealt with political affairs. Throughout clip, & # 8220 ; modernist creative persons have most frequently associated themselves with broad, extremist, and sometimes radical political places when they are non unpolitical or impersonal in their societal and political positions & # 8221 ; . & # 8220 ; Many politically slanted plants were shown in the 1960ss, but most of these were of small permanent aesthetic value & # 8221 ; . Yet, one topographic point where political relation was abundant in art in the 1960 & # 8217 ; s was in Afro-american art. This was because of the hawkish black battle against racism and for Civil Rights during this clip period.
But modernist art was non a topographic point where Afro-american art was found. Black art of the 1950 & # 8217 ; s and 1960 & # 8217 ; s is so its ain manner wholly and belongs in an history outside of modernism. It seems though that artists by and large put themselves instead than their art into political relations.
For illustration, in 1965, there was a full page article in the New York Times & # 8220 ; under the headline, & # 8216 ; End Your Silence & # 8217 ; signed by more than 500 creative persons and influential art-oriented individuals and naming for a protest against both the Vietnam War and the US intercession in the Dominican Republic & # 8221 ; . Although many people saw Pop art as nil more than the & # 8220 ; flaccid capitulation to the commercial philistinism that modernism had ever resisted & # 8221 ; , many of the creative persons including Andy Warhol, may hold hidden political relations in their complex, nuanced, and dry art. For illustration, were Warhol & # 8217 ; s insistent silk-screen images of race-riots, car catastrophes and electric chairs & # 8220 ; mere commands for promotion and businessperson titillation, or were they attempts to show the desensitising consequence of the infinitely repeated scenes of horror in the imperativeness and on the tubing? Was he merely taking things from popular civilization and using them in art, or was he noticing on them? This forces a new analysis of Pop art. Is at that place a deeper significance to these simple, commonplace objects and of these apparently insistent thoughts? Did they use things from Pop civilization because they were at that place or because they were demoing what they mean? Is it possible that the art of this clip period was more than meaningless abstractions and redundant images? Yes. As we look back on the art of the 1960 & # 8217 ; s, we can see deeper into what these pieces mean. How could any artist life in some of the most volatile and explosive times this state ignore the ferocious political and societal jobs environing them? The ground political relations wasn & # 8217 ; t emphasized in art during this clip may hold been to get away the things go oning in the universe. It besides may hold been that they weren & # 8217 ; t emphasized so that the spectator could make it by him or herself instead than be handed the significance immediately.
Decision:While it may non look at first sight, the art of these times genuinely did reflect the political relations environing it. More significantly though are the new thoughts which emerged during these times. Never before had the universe seen so many motions happening during one clip.
Artists during the period from the terminal of WWII until the tallness of the Vietnam War created and recreated art. Art had already been classified as & # 8220 ; modern & # 8221 ; and this put restraints on these creative persons. They had to research ways to overhaul themselves even more whether it was from go forthing the oculus and researching the encephalon in constructs or returning to the same photo-realism that the old Masterss used. Critics were stating that art had become a challenge to make with out being excess, so artists pushed the bounds and became excess intentionally. That is what the art of this clip period encompasses: forcing the bounds until it seems that they can non be pushed any longer and so making it once more and once more until art is genuinely created. Art in the mid-19th century was the most dynamic and influential art of the century and perchance some of the most influential of all time.
By utilizing what was already at that place, these creative persons produced wholly new thoughts. Their glare may non be seen in their accomplishment, but instead in their construct. So as we start in a new millenium, we have to inquire ourselves what will be the following great motion in art? Could at that place be anything once more every bit influential as the times that existed here? Lone clip will state.Beginnings:Cagle, Van M. , Reconstructing Pop/Subculture: Art Rock and Andy Warhol,New York: Sage Publications, 1995Yapp, Nick, Ed. The 1950s, Chicago: Konemann, 1998Yapp, Nick, Ed. The 1960s, Chicago: Konemann, 1998Reed, T.V.
, American Popular Culture. ( online ) Available:hypertext transfer protocol: //www.wsu.edu/~amerstu/pop/tvrguide.
html, February 17, 2000Seitz, William C. , Art in the Age of Aquarius, 1955-1970, Washington,District of columbia: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1992Alloway, Lawrence. American Pop Art, New York: Macmillan PrintingCo. , Inc.
, 1974Dynamic Motions. ( online ) Available: Hypertext transfer protocol: //library.thinkquest.org/17142/dynamic-movements/Jansen, H.W.
, The History of Art, New York: Harry N. Abrams Inc. , 1997,p. 914-915Warhol & # 8217 ; s Reflection of the Social Times. ( online ) Available:Hypertext transfer protocol: //vc.lemoyne.
edu/ant305/students/7_abarnett/page3.htmMarcel Duchamp. ( online ) Available:hypertext transfer protocol: //www.
peak.org/~dadaist/English/Graphics/duchamp.htmlBibliographyBeginnings:Cagle, Van M. , Reconstructing Pop/Subculture: Art Rock and Andy Warhol,New York: Sage Publications, 1995Yapp, Nick, Ed. The 1950s, Chicago: Konemann, 1998Yapp, Nick, Ed. The 1960s, Chicago: Konemann, 1998Reed, T.V. , American Popular Culture.
( online ) Available:hypertext transfer protocol: //www.wsu.edu/~amerstu/pop/tvrguide.html, February 17, 2000Seitz, William C. , Art in the Age of Aquarius, 1955-1970, Washington,District of columbia: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1992Alloway, Lawrence. American Pop Art, New York: Macmillan PrintingCo. , Inc. , 1974Dynamic Motions.
( online ) Available: Hypertext transfer protocol: //library.thinkquest.org/17142/dynamic-movements/Jansen, H.W. , The History of Art, New York: Harry N. Abrams Inc.
, 1997,p. 914-915Warhol & # 8217 ; s Reflection of the Social Times. ( online ) Available:Hypertext transfer protocol: //vc.lemoyne.edu/ant305/students/7_abarnett/page3.htmMarcel Duchamp.
( online ) Available:hypertext transfer protocol: //www.peak.org/~dadaist/English/Graphics/duchamp.html