The efficaciousness and safety of a intervention for Seborrhoeic Dermatitis shall be tested in a placebo-controlled clinical stage III survey. The name of the investigational merchandise is ABC-cream 0,25 % . The multi-centre test is designed as randomized and double-blinded survey, with the topics being divided into parallel groups. Participating topics have to be over 20 old ages old. Minor leagues or topics who are incapable of giving consent are excluded from the survey.
A stage III survey is performed in order to measure efficaciousness and safety of the ABC-cream 0,25 % . Several hundred to several thousand topics are included. The intent of a stage III test is to measure the risk-benefit ratio of the drug sing the equal labelling for the hereafter selling blessing ( Food and Drug Administration [ FDA ] , 2009 ) .
The test will be performed in the United States and in the European Union. Therefore differences in the entry and blessing procedures have to be considered.
2 Submission and Approval in the United States
The entry procedure in the U.S. begins even before the stage I study of the Investigational New Drug ( IND ) is conducted ( see figure 1 ) . The patron provides the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) with an Investigational New Drug Application bespeaking permission to execute a clinical test in the United States. The FDA is a regulative authorization within the American Department of Health and Human Services. Basic content of the IND Application is stated in The Code of Federal Regulations ( CFR ) Title 21 Part 312 Section 23 provinces. It is besides given on page two of the FDA-1571 signifier, which is besides an of import component of the application ( see appendix 1 ) .
Subsequently, the IND Review Process of the FDA commences and the patron is urged to wait 30 yearss to get down the clinical test ( see figure 2 ) . When the reappraisal period of 30 yearss has expired, the clinical survey can be initiated unless the FDA has placed a clinical clasp. The FDA ‘s primary concern is the safety of the topics. Sing that the ABC-cream test is a stage III study the FDA to boot reviews the survey design for measuring efficaciousness of ABC-cream.
Furthermore, the survey protocol has to be reviewed by an Institutional Review Board ( IRB ) . Each establishment carry oning a clinical test on worlds must organize an IRB. It is a commission dwelling of at least 5 experts and lay members from changing background. A qualified IRB should guarantee that institutional committednesss and ordinances, criterions of professional behavior and practise, community attitudes, and Torahs are acceptable in the survey. Primary concern of the IRB is the protection of human rights ( Food and Drug Administration [ FDA ] , 21 CFR Part 56, 2008 ) .
The ABC-cream has already passed these phases and is now – after completing Phase II – ready to come in the stage III. Beforehand, a Sponsor/FDA Meeting with the focal point on the “ terminal of stage II ” has to be held. It is necessary to determine the safety of the ABC-cream before get downing stage III testing. The intent of the Sponsor/FDA Meeting is besides to happen conventions between the bureau and the patron harmonizing to the overall program, design and aims for the ABC-cream survey in stage III. An effectual meeting can avoid extra outgos of clip and money ( see figure 3 ) .
It is the patron ‘s duty to supply background information and protocols for stage III one month prior to the Sponsor/FDA Meeting. In conformance with the CDER Handbook ( 1998, p.10 ) , the undermentioned contents should be provided: informations back uping the claim of the new drug merchandise, chemical science informations, animate being informations and proposed extra animate being informations, consequences of stage I and II surveies, statistical methods being used, specific protocols for stage III surveies and, if available, a transcript of the suggested labelling for the ABC-cream.
Further detailed information on processs for clinical tests is given in the Manual of Policies and Procedures ( MaPPs ) ( Food and Drug Administration [ FDA ] , 2009 ) .
During the survey, the patron has the duty to take an experient research worker and to guarantee appropriate preparation. The patron is obliged to supervise the probe ( s ) in order to guarantee conformity with the general investigational program and the survey protocol. Care of the IND and immediate information of FDA and research workers in instance of new inauspicious effects is besides obligatory ( Food and Drug Administration [ FDA ] , 21 CFR 312 Section 50, 2008 ) .
The research worker, on the other manus, is responsible for carry oning probes harmonizing to the signed research workers statement ( FDA-1572: see appendix 2 ) , the investiAgational program, and applicable ordinances ( Food and Drug Administration [ FDA ] , 21 CRF 312.60, 2008 )
3 Submission and Approval in the European Union
Basic rules for the EU entry of a clinical test are the ‘EU Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 ‘ and the ‘Commission Directive 2005/28/EC of 8 April 2005 ‘ . The paperss were implemented to standardize processs and administrative activities within the EU. In add-on, the Directives ‘ primary end is the protection of the human topic. They are based on the Good Clinical Practise ( GCP ) for the usage of investigational medicative merchandises on worlds.
First and first, a EudraCT figure should be obtained from the EMEA for the entry of the ABC-cream test. The EudraCT figure is a alone mention in order to place the particular survey. Subsequently, a Clinical Trial Authorisation Application ( CTA ) should be completed. It contains the following nucleus information: The EudraCT figure, a covering missive, the application signifier, the protocol, the Research workers Brochure ( IB ) , the Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier ( IMPD ) , a list of Competent Authorities to which the entry has been made, and a transcript of the EC blessing. The Clinical Trial Authorisation Application Form with a elaborate checklist of farther demands is attached to the appendix 3.
Harmonizing to the Directive 2001/20/EC Article 9.2, the CTA shall be submitted to the Competent Authorities ( CA ) of the Member States. The period until the CA informs the patron about credence or non-acceptance of the ABC-cream test shall non transcend 60 yearss ( see figure 4 ) . In instance the patron receives a presentment of non-acceptance, the patron may amend a petition. If no petition is provided by the patron, the test is considered as rejected ( Directing 2001/20/EC, 2001, Article 9 ) .
The Competent Authorities can be either national ( e.g. BfArM ) or supranational ( e.g. EMEA ) . Reason for the division of those regulative governments is the country-specific handling of clinical tests in the EU Member States ( Harman, 2004, p. 15 ) . The different national and supranational regulative governments are listed in table 1. Further differences are reflected in the different ways the Directives were adopted to the demands and processs of the single Member States.
Besides the application to the CA, a entry should be made to the responsible Ethical motives Committee ( EC ) . The EC is an independent organic structure of a Member State. Members of an EC are medical and non-medical professionals. The map of the EC is to guarantee the wellbeing and safety of human test topics. In add-on, the EC shall guarantee farther protection for the topic by giving an sentiment on the survey protocol every bit good as on the paperss for topics ( e.g. paperss to inform the topic and informed consent signifiers ) and the making of the Investigators ( Directive 2001/20/EC, 2001, Section 2 ) .
After reception of the entry, the EC should hold a upper limit of 60 yearss to give a eventful sentiment to the patron and the Competent Authority in the Member State. If the EC petitions farther information, the period can be extended to a upper limit of 35 yearss get downing with reception of the amendments. The 35-day period can to boot prolonged by a petition of the Competent Authority ( Clumeck & A ; Dorethy, 2004 ) . The single blessing times are regulated by the individual Member States ( see table 2 )
Furthermore, the ABC-cream test is a multi-centre test and can be conducted in more than one Member State. In this instance, the Ethics Committee of each involved Member State must give their individual sentiment about the Phase III survey ( Directive 2001/20/EC, 2001, Article 7 ) .
The patron should go to to the undermentioned responsibilities and duties: Roll up the protocol and informed consent papers including the Directive, submit and supply certification to Ethics Committee and Competent Authority, study SUSARs to research workers and moralss commission, and respond to any petition of the EC and the CA ( Clumeck & A ; Dorethy, 2004 ) .
4 Comparing Summary of the United States and the European
In general, the cardinal guidelines for both the European Union and the United States are the Declaration of Helsinki and the ICH-GCP guidelines. These guidelines apply to patronize, research workers, responsible Ethical motives Committees and regulative governments ( Food and Drug Administration [ FDA ] , 2009 ) ( Directing 2001/20/EC, 2001 ) .
Based on the Good Clinical Practise ( GCP ) provided by the International Conference on Harmonisation ( ICH ) , the Code of Federal Regulations contains guidelines for the U.S. , whereas the EU returns harmonizing to the EU Directives.
To summarize, the application procedure differs between the U.S. and the EU. The regulative governments in the European Union are national and supranational Competent Authorities, which are by and large located in the take parting Member States. In contrast, the regulative authorization in the U.S. is the Food and Drug Administration.
The Ethics commissions of the United States and the European Union vary in their organizational construction. The American Ethics Committee, the Institutional Review Board, is organised by the establishment which conducts the clinical test. On the contrary, the Ethics Committee in the EU is an independent organic structure located in the Member States in which the survey is performed.
Even the applications for the clinical test differ from each other. The Investigational New Drug ( IND ) Application includes merely the entry for a clinical test in the U.S. The IND Application is provided one time before stage I test can be approved. For the execution of the ABC-cream test – which is a stage III survey – a sponsor/FDA Meeting with focal point on the “ terminal of Phase II ” is required.
In contrast, in the EU the patron applies for Clinical Trial Authorisation before the stage III of the ABC-cream test commences. The reappraisal period is 60 yearss at maximal and can be extended by farther 35 yearss or even longer, depending on the CA.
Finally, blessing of the regulative authorization and the Ethics Committee is required in both the European Union and the United States.
Approval times in the different Member States of the EU
4-12 hebdomads ( EC and clip of recognition of reception of presentment )
4-8 hebdomads ( EC merely )
1-2 months ( EC and reception of presentment figure )
6-12 months ( depends on whether the merchandise is new or known )
2-4 hebdomads ( of import license clip )
2-12 months ( EC and mandate )
5-9 hebdomads ( +1-2 months for EC blessing )
[ 1 ] Clumeck, A N. , O’Doherty, E, ( Eds. ) . ( 2004 ) . The EU Directive: Practical Deductions for Clinical Research Teams. Retrieved June 7, 2009 hypertext transfer protocol: //appliedclinicaltrialsonline.findpharma.com/appliedclinicaltrials/article/articleDetail.jsp? id=92959
[ 2 ] Department of Health and Human Services, HHS, Food and Drug Administration, FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research ( 1998 ) . The CDER Handbook ( most recent version the FDA provides )
[ 3 ] Department of Health and Human Services, HHS, Food and Drug Administration, FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research ( 2003 ) . Concept Paper, End-Of-Phase-2A with patrons sing exposure-response of IND and NDA merchandises. Retrieved May 29, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/03/briefing/3998B1_01_Topic % 201-Part % 20A.pdf
[ 4 ] European Drug Regulatory Affairs Consulting, EUDRAC ( 2009 ) . Clinical Trial Applications ( CTA ) and Ethics Committee Applications in the EU. Retrieved May 29, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.eudrac.com/services/index.html
[ 5 ] European Commission ( 2005 ) . Detailed counsel for the petition for mandate of a clinical test on a medicative merchandise for human usage to the competent governments, presentment of significant amendments and declaration of the terminal of the test. Retrieved May 29, 2009, hypertext transfer protocol: //ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol-10/11_ca_14-2005.pdf
[ 6 ] Evens, R. P. ( Ed. ) . ( 2007 ) . Drug and Biological Development: From Molecule to Product and Beyond. Jacksonville: Springer.
[ 7 ] Fletcher, A. J. , Edwards, L. D. , Fox, A. W. , Stonier, P. D. , ( Eds. ) . ( 2002 ) . Principles and Practice of the Pharmaceutical Medicine. West Sussex: Wiley.
[ 8 ] Harman, R. J. ( Ed. ) . ( 2004 ) . Development and control of medical specialties and medical devices. Farnham: Pharmaceutical Press.
[ 9 ] Official Journal of the European Union ( 2005 ) . Commission Directive 2005/28/EC. Retrieved May 29, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //eur-lex.europa.eu/
LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do? uri=OJ: L:2005:091:0013:0019: En: PDF
[ 10 ] Official Journal of the European Union ( 2001 ) , Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Retrieved May 29, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.wctn.org.uk/downloads/EU_Directive/Directive.pdf
[ 11 ] Pisano, D. J. , & A ; Mantus, D. ( Eds. ) . ( 2008 ) . FDA Regulatory Affairs: A Guide for Prescription Drugs, Medical Devices, and Biologics, 2nd Edition. Lexington: Informa Health Care.
[ 12 ] Schwarz, J. A. ( Eds. ) . ( 2005 ) . Leitfaden Klinische Prufungen von Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukten. Aulendorf: Editio Canter.
[ 13 ] Selden, S. , MD ( 2009 ) . Seborrheic Dermatitis. Retrieved May 29, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //emedicine.medscape.com/article/1108312-overview
[ 14 ] United States Department of Health and Human Services, HHS ( 2009 ) . IRB Guidebook. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.hhs.gov/
[ 15 ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA ( 2008 ) , 21 CFR 312, Investigational New Drug Application: Volume 5. Retrieved May 29, 2009, signifier hypertext transfer protocol: //www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch
[ 16 ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA ( 2008 ) , 21 CFR 312, Institutional Review Boardss: Volume 1. Retrieved May 29, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm? CFRPart=56
[ 17 ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA ( 2009 ) , Preambles to GCP Regulations. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.accessdata.fda.gov/
[ 18 ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA ( 2009 ) . Investigational New Drug ( IND ) Application. Retrieved June 2, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.fda.gov/
Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/InvestigationalNewDrugINDApplication/default.htm # MaPPs