centred way of the social workers to implement newsolutions into their organisation that promote profitable social work.

 Lue and Schelle (2009) indicatesthat in Germany education and early childhood care is usually situated withinthe child and youth welfare systems one aspects of the system is a socialpedagogy approach towards children’s services in which care childhood andeducation are attached essential. In Germany, social pedagogy practicecare and upbringing are surrounded in a broad understanding of education thatcan be defined as a complete procedure of emergingthe skills which allow human beings to learn, to develop their achievementpotential, to act, to solve problems, and to form relationships. Simpson and Nowacki (2015) The social pedagogy in Germany is the difference between social pedagogy andsocial work has, Second, criticisms of the English system can be found in the understood tradition of socialpedagogy and relationship-based practice.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

According, to Ruling (2008)research classifies the conservative welfare state of Germany with a view ofmen are the model and working states, whereas women are the carers and areresponsibilities for the young children. Likewise, in England the neo-liberalwelfare state intervention in families was low usually in cases where thechildren are abused or neglected, England has been defined as liberal welfarestate by considering the low involvement of the state into the marker, Englandhas limited practice of general family policy. In England, the people living in poverty get support through the formsof the poverty relief, the low support the mothers within the state until 1990England have been considered as male as the worker model. However, in Germanywelfare state, there was little clear support for mothers as housewives likeparental payment for care.

  In Germanychildcare and social services have generally been measured responsibilities ofthe family with mothers seen as the primary responsible for the young children Furthermore, Ruling (2008) show that the first driver fordevelopment of child care was to overcome child poverty and enable mother andparents to retune to work, the idea would certain be continuity in liberalwelfare state thought, poverty prevented and targeted policies have always beenreason for state intervention in the liberal model. As employment, had beenfound to be the most effective way of poverty prevention socially completeprogrammers targeted at difficulty children the poverty and welfare.  In the German context, a successful re-framingof family policy and childcare from a soft policy for gender equality to a’hard’ policy fostering economic growth can be observed during the second termof office of the red-green government. As some researchers argue, the mainpolicy driver for family policy reform in Germany has been the demographicchange.

The increasing attention on demographic issues has been fuelled by adominant public debate on low birth rates, a fear of the ‘dying nation’, aswell as the economic costs involved in the demographic changes, especiallythrough the rising costs for pension insurance. Rogowski (2012) argues that the neo-liberalideology that the market was greater to the state and that public servicesneeded to be managed much like the private sector, the public services,including social work, had to develop more like profitable businesses. TheChildren Act 1989, became from child welfare to child protection, socialworkers and workers the important professionals with the police and countstaking an increasing role. Additionally, social worker are the ones whoinvestigates with the parents of part of the what’s happening. Furthermore, Rogowski (2012) in England every childmater controlled to the