Essay, Research Paper& # 65279 ; Fictional characters Representing Society Groups in William Golding s Lord of the FliessGolding made each character represent a societal group in Lord of the Flies. Piggy represents the mind and Jack is the bully. They are two chief characters that play importantfunctions in showing Golding s thoughts approximately society as a whole.When Golding told us, what intelligence had been shown was traceable to Piggy, but the most obvious leader was Jack. , we learned that Piggy had been characterized as the encephalon of thegroup.

We can besides deduce from this statement that Piggy held small or no political clout, and could non acquire others to follow his instructions. For illustration, when he tried to take names of the male childsafter Ralph left, they simply wandered off without taking notice of Piggy s bids. He is portrayed as the mind & # 8212 ; and non the actor. Golding s word pictures of his physical visual aspect and inabilities do non help him in deriving any leading of the group. His demand to delight Ralph is another failing that eroded any power his intelligence might hold given him with the group. Piggy was teased and rapidly turned into the foreigner by one of his ainfanatic efforts to win the favour of Ralph.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Piggy represents the mind, who in existent society is frequently surpassed by the actor. Golding shows how Ralph uses Piggy merely on selective occasions, while other times he merely leads or joins the tormenting. Ralph becomes elected head of the group, while Piggy was simply a secret helper behind the scenes. Thinkers can non acquire anything done without actors, and this is straight shown and proved in the book by the word pictures ofPiggy and Ralph.Society has its weak members, like Piggy, and the strong, like Jack. Jack knows how to acquire what he wants and his preferable method is strong-arming. He is invariably baleful and scaring those underneath him which gives him a enormous supply of power, and Jack is most surely power-craving. Golding shows that Jack can command and acquire consequences, but if his demands are non met so he shows no restraint upon utilizing force to accomplish them.

He shortly developed an astonishing gustatory sensation for force. The demand to run for endurance became non merely for meat, but for the putting to death. drags the others down with him in his Hunts, and the follower s shortly sink to the degree of barbarians more volitionally than non, as Jack had earlier on. He transformed the others to roast Piggy and dainty those who were non portion of their folk with force. As a general statement, Jack ridicules those who are weaker or merely non like himself, merely as toughs are known for. Golding proves him a bully when he smashes one of Piggy s lenses and this is clearly Jack s triumph of force over intelligence.I have learned a batch about how writers can show their sentiments symbolically through fictional characters and thoughts from this book.

Golding s work has been deciphered and pulled apart by many philosophers and experts in the yesteryear and it will mos T surely regarded as a literary chef-d’oeuvre of concealed significances and representations in the yearss yet to come.