Christianity Questioned Essay, Research PaperIn? Christianity and the Machine Age, ? Eric Gill attempts to turn out thatChristianity is true.

To reply this inquiry, Gill turns non to philosophers,theologists or archeologists, but to his ain consciousness. ? If there be God,if there be Christ, ? it is to adult male, to the single adult male that he calls. ?( Gill, 219 ) Gill bases his statement on the given that the truth is thecorrespondence of idea with thing. ? In Christianity idea and thingcorrespond. It is in that sense that we say Christianity is true, is thetruth. ? ( Gill, 219 ) Gill says that what he knows of Christ corresponds withwhat he knows and desires and loves as a human.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Gill besides asserts that he has noground to say that he is any? different in sort or in powers or inexperience from other men. ? ( Gill, 219 ) Gill says it follows that sinceChristianity is true for him, it must so besides be true for all work forces. Harmonizingto Gill, those who do non accept the truth of Christianity are merely incorrect.Gill continues, asseverating that Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam and all other religionsare lesser because they are? more partial, less profound, and hence lesswidespread. ? ( Gill, 219 ) This is a hapless statement sing that Christianswere a minority group for 1000s of old ages. While Gill does non experience thatother religions are untrue, he says that the lone religion with a clear position ofworld is Christianity. ? Observe, for illustration, an object under a microscope.Attempt to acquire it into focal point.

But, unless the object be perfectly level, youwill acquire one degree in focal point and non another. You will non be able to see it allat one time, and you will possibly go through some degrees altogether. ? ( Gill, 219 ) Thismetaphor is an first-class manner to explicate why so many differing faiths existwhen there is merely one Truth.

Gill does non, nevertheless, provide any ground topresume that Christianity is seeing the truth any more clearly than the othermajor universe faiths. The statement that Christianity is more right because it? affirms? more sets Christianity as the lowest common denominator. This doesnon turn out that the truth as seen through the Christian? microscope? is anyclearer that when the truth is viewed through any other faith? s? microscope. ? Gill? s point about denials is good made, nevertheless. ? Themerely thing to beware of is denial. It is on the plane of denials that we fallfoul of one another. ? ( Gill, 219 ) I agree with Gill that it is more productiveto analyze the commonalities than the struggles when comparing faiths.Gill? s intent in trying to reply such a profound inquiry is tied to hisdefinition of proper work in the Age of Machines.

? Christianity? must connotesomething as to the object of human life and the object of human work. ? ( Gill,220 ) Gill says that if Christianity is removed from the procedure of work, thework ( wo ) adult male will be lowered to a subhuman status by degrading labour andconcentrating on profit-gaining terminals. For Gill, this is the true menace of theMachine Age. ? The consequence of the Machine Age is to secularise human life, toget rid of the Christian standard of sanctity, understood both morally andintellectually. ? ( Gill, 235 ) Gill does let that machines may assist torelieve some of the agony that exists in the universe, but he has noassurance that the influence of capitalist industrialism will be overcome.

? The spirit which has animated merchandisers and industrialists and moneymansfrom the beginning of the Machine Age, whether in large concern or little, is nonthe proviso of societal agreeableness or the alleviation of agony, but theaggrandisement of themselves. ? ( Gill, 235 ) For Gill the lone hope for humanityprevarications in the creative activity of a Christian universe, a universe based on? Christian religion,ruled by Christian idea, and moved by a Christian will. ? ( Gill, 236 ) Iagree with many of the values and ideals that Gill espouses.

It is obvious thatsomething must alter, peculiarly with respect to the overemphasis on thenet income motivation. I do, nevertheless, disagree with his impression that these ideals canmerely be applied through the templet of Christianity. Christian leaders haveshown themselves to be no more just or humane than non-Christians. Neither hasthe influence of Christian spiritual leaders, peculiarly Catholic leaders,been proved superior.

If fact, the states most profoundly entrenched inindustrial capitalist economy are preponderantly Christian. Any challenge to the positionquo, whether issued by a Buddhist or a Christian, would be an first-class start inthe attempt to alter the manner the universe views work and working people. Gill? sgiven that merely Christianity holds the reply is misguided.336