Last updated: July 12, 2019
Topic: ReligionChristianity
Sample donated:

Christianity Questioned Essay, Research Paper

In? Christianity and the Machine Age, ? Eric Gill attempts to turn out that

Christianity is true. To reply this inquiry, Gill turns non to philosophers,

theologists or archeologists, but to his ain consciousness. ? If there be God,

if there be Christ, ? it is to adult male, to the single adult male that he calls. ?

( Gill, 219 ) Gill bases his statement on the given that the truth is the

correspondence of idea with thing. ? In Christianity idea and thing

correspond. It is in that sense that we say Christianity is true, is the

truth. ? ( Gill, 219 ) Gill says that what he knows of Christ corresponds with

what he knows and desires and loves as a human. Gill besides asserts that he has no

ground to say that he is any? different in sort or in powers or in

experience from other men. ? ( Gill, 219 ) Gill says it follows that since

Christianity is true for him, it must so besides be true for all work forces. Harmonizing

to Gill, those who do non accept the truth of Christianity are merely incorrect.

Gill continues, asseverating that Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam and all other religions

are lesser because they are? more partial, less profound, and hence less

widespread. ? ( Gill, 219 ) This is a hapless statement sing that Christians

were a minority group for 1000s of old ages. While Gill does non experience that

other religions are untrue, he says that the lone religion with a clear position of

world is Christianity. ? Observe, for illustration, an object under a microscope.

Attempt to acquire it into focal point. But, unless the object be perfectly level, you

will acquire one degree in focal point and non another. You will non be able to see it all

at one time, and you will possibly go through some degrees altogether. ? ( Gill, 219 ) This

metaphor is an first-class manner to explicate why so many differing faiths exist

when there is merely one Truth. Gill does non, nevertheless, provide any ground to

presume that Christianity is seeing the truth any more clearly than the other

major universe faiths. The statement that Christianity is more right because it

? affirms? more sets Christianity as the lowest common denominator. This does

non turn out that the truth as seen through the Christian? microscope? is any

clearer that when the truth is viewed through any other faith? s

? microscope. ? Gill? s point about denials is good made, nevertheless. ? The

merely thing to be

ware of is denial. It is on the plane of denials that we fall

foul of one another. ? ( Gill, 219 ) I agree with Gill that it is more productive

to analyze the commonalities than the struggles when comparing faiths.

Gill? s intent in trying to reply such a profound inquiry is tied to his

definition of proper work in the Age of Machines. ? Christianity? must connote

something as to the object of human life and the object of human work. ? ( Gill,

220 ) Gill says that if Christianity is removed from the procedure of work, the

work ( wo ) adult male will be lowered to a subhuman status by degrading labour and

concentrating on profit-gaining terminals. For Gill, this is the true menace of the

Machine Age. ? The consequence of the Machine Age is to secularise human life, to

get rid of the Christian standard of sanctity, understood both morally and

intellectually. ? ( Gill, 235 ) Gill does let that machines may assist to

relieve some of the agony that exists in the universe, but he has no

assurance that the influence of capitalist industrialism will be overcome.

? The spirit which has animated merchandisers and industrialists and moneymans

from the beginning of the Machine Age, whether in large concern or little, is non

the proviso of societal agreeableness or the alleviation of agony, but the

aggrandisement of themselves. ? ( Gill, 235 ) For Gill the lone hope for humanity

prevarications in the creative activity of a Christian universe, a universe based on? Christian religion,

ruled by Christian idea, and moved by a Christian will. ? ( Gill, 236 ) I

agree with many of the values and ideals that Gill espouses. It is obvious that

something must alter, peculiarly with respect to the overemphasis on the

net income motivation. I do, nevertheless, disagree with his impression that these ideals can

merely be applied through the templet of Christianity. Christian leaders have

shown themselves to be no more just or humane than non-Christians. Neither has

the influence of Christian spiritual leaders, peculiarly Catholic leaders,

been proved superior. If fact, the states most profoundly entrenched in

industrial capitalist economy are preponderantly Christian. Any challenge to the position

quo, whether issued by a Buddhist or a Christian, would be an first-class start in

the attempt to alter the manner the universe views work and working people. Gill? s

given that merely Christianity holds the reply is misguided.