As against short fibres of steel that are sometimes used to better the tensile strength and postcracking behaviour of the brickle concrete matrix, uninterrupted long fibres can be used as a replacing of the the steel as a reenforcing stuff for strengthened and pre-stressed concrete building. From the conventional representation of the cross subdivision of the uninterrupted FRP composite shown in Figure 19 it is clear that they can be seen as made up of highly all right fibres embedded in a matrix. The volume fraction of the fibres in normally available FRPs ranges from approximately 50 to 65 % .

The belongingss of FRP composite merchandises are related to 1 ) belongingss of the fibre used 2 ) the belongingss of the matrix used and 3 ) the volume fraction of the fibres ( Jeffrey, 2003 ) .Fig 19

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Stairss of executing

Application of FRP strips is carried out in the undermentioned stairss.Mechanical cleansing of substance ( e.g.

by sand blasting ) in order to make somewhat unsmooth surface.Removal of dust from the concrete surface.Cuting of FRP strips to plan size.Cleaning of FRP strips from C dust.Blending of adhesive ( A+ B constituents ) .

Application of adhesive both to the substance ad to the FRP ( potlife of adhesive should be considered )Rolling or forcing of FRP in to the adhesive ( riddance of air bubbles ) . Final thickness of adhesive should be 1 to 1.5 millimeters.

Cover bed to the FRP by the adhesive ( if required ) .Fire protection ( if required ) .UV protection ( if required ) .Application of wraps is similar to that of strips, nevertheless above point 4 is irrelevant and in instance of point 6 the adhesive to FRP is applied after puting it.

An of import application regulation is that FRP does non necessitate back uping during hardening of adhesive owning to its low weight.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –

FRP saloon

Shear belongingss

The behavior of FRP complexs under shear burden is dominated by the matrix belongingss and, local emphasis distributions. The specialised composite literature is peculiarly dedicated in-plan shear of lamina and laminated constructions, but FRP reinforcing bars are chiefly subjected to transverse shear. Therefore shear belongingss should be evaluated with regard to shear burden.Fig 17. Round FRP saloon subjected to transverse shearFig 18.

Rectangular FRP saloon subjected to transverse shearIn instance of FRP bars a important addition in shear opposition can be achieved by weaving or lacing fibres transverse to the chief reinforcing fibres. Pultruded bars can be strengthened in shear by utilizing uninterrupted strand mat in add-on to longitudinal fibres ( ACI, 2006 ) . Test methods for the word picture of the shear behavior of FRP bars, in footings both dowel action and interlaminar shear, have been developed by assorted commissions and are now available in the literature [ JSCE-E 540 ( 1995 ) , ACI ( 2004 ) , ASTM ( 2002 ) ] .

The belongingss needed for a peculiar application should be obtained from the saloon industry who should besides supply information on the trial method used to find the reported shear values.

Effectss of lading on way on mechanical belongingss

FRP bars are orthotropic and their best belongingss are in the fiber way. When FRP support is utilized in the stirrups the strength in an inclined way ten with an angle I? to the fiber way ( so called of axis strength ) is required. Formulas have been developed for both stiffness and strength in off-axis way ( Gay et al, 2003 ) .

— — — — — — — — — — — — —

Quality control

Adequate quality of the executing can be reach by sing the undermentioned demands:a ) Certified stuff belongingss both for FRP and adhesive.

B ) Qualified and trained workers for Celsius ) Appropriate cleansing of surface ( dust free surface is needed ) .vitamin D ) Continuous bond should be provided ( ckecks by destructive or non-destructive testing ) .

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Existing codifications and guidelines

Presently, design ushers exist in Japan, Canada, the USA and the UK. In Norway, probationary design recommendations have been developed.

Table 4 summarizes the durability-related strength decrease or emphasis confining factors assumed for non pre-stressed FRP support in the assorted guidelines.The chief point to observe here is that these guidelines have a individual “ environmental consequence ” factor for each FRP stuff depending in its fibre type, merely. However the chief environmental effects are wet, base, temperature and clip.Table 4. Decrease factors used in bing guideline to take history of tensile strength decrease due to environmental actions and sustained emphasis ( story, 2007 )

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Design guidelines in Europe

The first research commission on continues fiber reenforcing stuff was established in 1989 by the Japan society of civil applied scientists ( JSCE ) . A committee in Canada sing for concrete besides began in 1989.The Canadian society of civil applied scientists created a proficient commission on the usage of advanced composite stuffs in span and structures.

In 1991 the American concrete institute ( ACI ) formed commission 440 on fiber reinforced polymer support, whose attempt lead to the publication of a state-of-the-art study in 1996 [ 2 ] followed by probationary design recommendations last drafted in January 2000 [ 3 ] .In Sweden a study has been established on ‘strengthening of bing concrete constructions with C fiber cloths or laminates-Dimensioning, stuff and executing ‘ which has been expected as a Swedish national rail route and route codification in 1999 [ 4 ] .In Germany, different so called adept sentiments, which are merchandise related, have been issued. These paperss are committee by the makers and measure the suitableness and design of the FRP merchandise for usage as adhesive-bonded support to beef up concrete members.In the UK a proficient study called “ Design counsel for beef uping concrete constructions utilizing fiber composite stuffs ” has been published by the concrete society in terminal 2000 [ 5 ] .In the Netherlands, a CUR working committee has reached its concluding phase in fixing recommendation on the usage and design of externally bonded CFRP support for concrete members, to be published by the terminal of 2001.In Switzerland, a committee has been initiated which aims in the development of a SIA codification of FRP EBR.However, the interested in FRP support in the universe is considerable and its usage is acquiring more by and large known, chiefly with regard to externally bonded FRP support.

IN different states, design guideline are available or under development.– — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Applications of FRP — — — — — — — — — — — –

Techniques for beef uping with composite

Basic technique

The basic composite stuff strengthening technique, which is most widely applied, involves the manual application of either wet layup ( alleged manus layup ) or prefabricated systems by agencies of cold cured adhesive bonding. This is the alleged authoritative FRP strengthening technique. Common in this technique is that the external support is bonded on to the concrete surface with the fibres every bit parallel as peculiarly possible to the way of rule tensile emphasiss. Typical applications of manus layup and prefabricated systems are illustrated in Figure 4.Fig 4. ( a ) Hand layup of CFRP sheets or cloths, ( B ) application of prefabricated strips ( story Bulletin, 2001 )

Particular technique

Beside the basic technique, several particular techniques have been developed.

Two of them are briefly explained in he following.

Automated wrapper

The strengthening technique through twist of tow or tape was foremost developed in Japan in the early 90s and a small later in the USA. The technique shown in the Figure 5, involves continues twist of wet fibres under a little angle around columns or other constructions ( e.g. chimneys, as has been done in Japan ) by agencies of automaton. Key advantage of the technique, apart from good quality control, is the rapid installing.Fig 5.

Aotumated RC colomn wrapper. ( a ) Schematic. ( B ) exposure of robot-wrapper.

Near-surface mounted support

Near surface mounted support may be thought of as an exceptional method of supplementing support to concrete constructions. Harmonizing to this method, the concrete stuffs in the signifier of strips or rods are placed in to slits or channels, severally, which are cut in to the concrete construction with a deepness smaller than the concrete screen. Typically CFRP strips e.g.

with a thickness of 2 millimeters and a breadth of 20 millimeters are bonded in to these slits ( Figure 7 )The tensile strength of the CFRP can be reached in beams with extra support consisting of strips in slits, if there is adequate lad transporting capacity of the compaction zone in the concrete and for shear. The bond behavior with high strength and ductileness allows bridge broad cleft peeling-off. Hence, the FRP stuff can be used more expeditiously if it is glued in to slits alternatively of on the surface.Fig 7.

CFRP strips glued in to slits

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –

Mechanically-fastened FRP

A beef uping method has been developed in the past few old ages ( e.g. Lamanna et al.

2001 ) where the beef uping strips are wholly automatically attached to the concrete surface utilizing multiple little, distributed pulverization actuated fasteners, sometimes in combination with ground tackle bolts at the strip ends, without any bonding. This system requires simple and manus tools, lightweight stuffs and minimally trained labor. Unlike the conventional method of adhesively adhering FRP strips to the concrete surface, this beef uping technique does non requires important surface readying and allows for the immediate usage of the reinforced construction. RC elements strengthened with conventional method ( of adhesively adhering FRP strips ) exhibit a inclination to neglect in a brickle manner, with a sudden debonding of the strip. However, appropriately design machinery fastener strips enable a more malleable failure, due to the partial shear connexion at the strip concrete-interface as a consequence of strip compaction failure at the point of contact with the fasteners, perchance combined with fastener pull-out and/or bending. One of the key demands for this desirable failure mechanism to be activated is the proper design of strips with fibres in many waies, so that sudden shearing type of failures in the strips may be avoided.Fig 8.

( a ) Mechanically fastened FRP. ( B ) Detaile of terminal anchorage with a combination of ground tackles and pulverization actuated nails.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Consequence of beef uping method for opening on CFRP sheet

When beef uping reinforced concrete edifices with C fiber-reinforced plastic ( CFRP ) sheet, the parts to be strengthened by CFRP sheet usually have applied finishing stuffs. If a dry coating procedure is adopted, so bolt holes should be drilled through the sheets. Receptacles and boxes embedded in the edifice organic structure besides require opening in the sheet. Since the beef uping consequence of CFRP sheet is produced by its uninterrupted adhesion on to the member, such gap which causes discontinuity of the sheet, may cut down the beef uping consequence. Because of the directional belongingss of CFRP sheet, unsteadily remains about the method of beef uping around gaps.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Safety factor

A limited value of the failure strain may besides be considered as a simplified design option.

In this instance, the ULS confirmation restricts inordinate distortion in the composite stuffs, instead than verifying the related failure manner itself. If the ULS confirmation involves bond failure, it is expected that this will develop through shearing in the concrete. In this instance the stuff safety factor is taken as that for concrete failure. In the undermentioned tabular array type A is comparative to application of prefab systems under normal quality control conditions. Type B is comparative to application of wet lay-up system under normal quality control conditions.FRP typeApplication type AApplication type BCFRP1.201.

35AFRP1.251.45GFRP1.301.50Table 2. Composite stuff safety factors I?f ( story, 2001 )

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –

Failure manners

There are fundamentally four types of failure in a RC beam strengthened with FRP:

Flexural failure

Flexural failure by and large occurs when there is no debonding at the terminals of FRP sheets. In a flexural failure either the FRP sheet is rupture or the concrete is crushed in compaction.

Besides this failure is really similar to the flexural failure of RC beams, it is a really brickle failure. Actually flexural strengthening of RC beams utilizing FRP sheets leads to a strength addition ( up to 76 % ) but causes a decrease in ductileness.

Shear failure

In a RC beam strengthened in flexural utilizing FRP sheets, the shear failure manner can be more critical. FRP sheets placed at the tenseness zone of RC beam have small part to shear opposition. Thus the shear capacity of an RC beam dictates the failure manner. In such instances the shear capacity of RC beam must be increased, so that flexural failure precedes shear failure. Although in a RC beam strengthened with FRP sheets flexural failure is brickle, it is still more malleable than shear failure.

Debonding of plate-end failure

Before ultimate capacity of the reinforced beam is reached, premature failure may happen due to stop debonding ( Figure 13 ) . Separation of the concrete screen at one of the two terminals is the most normally seen failure manner. In this manner of failure, foremost a cleft signifier, it propagates up to the tenseness support and so progresses horizontally along the steel. This presses leads to the separation of the concrete screen.

Fig 14. Plate-end debonding failure

Intermediate crack-induced interfacial debonding failure

Debonding may happen at a flexural cleft near mid-span that propagates towards one terminal. This is intermediate crack-induced interfacial debonding failure ( Figure 15 ) .

It is besides a really premature and brickle manner of failure.Fig.15 Intermediate crack-induced interfacial debonding failure ( Teng et al, 2002 )

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Design of concrete members strengthened with externally bonded FRP support

In contrast to ACI-440, the Eurocode 2 still does non turn to particularly the usage of FRP support and the equations derived for steel bars, which may will be inappropriate in FRP RC design, where used in the design illustration. It becomes evident that the values adopted for the EC 2 coefficients taking in to account bond belongingss of the steel reenforcing bond are non appropriate for the FRP support. The ACI-440 equation for effectual minute of inactiveness Icr, vitamin E includes alteration parametric quantity I?d which takes in to account bond belongingss of the FRP bars. However the implied relation between the bond belongingss of the FRP support and their immature ‘s modulus of snap Ef is non so obvious.

From point of view of Triantafillou ( 2001 ) the differences in consequences between the two codifications of pattern emerged chiefly due to different considerations of bond belongingss of the FRP bars and any farther codification of pattern should turn to in a more consistent manner.

Guidelines for beef uping concrete constructions with FRP laminates

Flexural strengthening

Adhering FRP to the tenseness face increases the flexural strength of beams and slabs. Failure of the component may so happen as a consequence of either the concrete making its ultimate compressive strain or FRP making its ultimate tensile strain. Lab trials have shown that the latter seldom occurs in pattern. The component by and large fails prematurely as a consequence of home base separation.

This is unwanted since the failure burden is hard to foretell. In design, grounding the RP and the design strain in the FRP below its ultimate value usually voids this status. The design process is a map of failure manner. Calculating the design ultimate minute and comparing with the balanced minute of opposition of subdivision can foretell the failure manner. Balanced failure in a reinforced beam is said to happen when the concrete and the FRP reach their ultimate design strains at the same time. When the design minute is less than the balance minute, the FRP will make its design tensile strains before the concrete crushes whereas when the design minute exceed the balance minute, the concrete will oppress before the FRP reaches its design tensile strain.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –

Flexural strengthening

Reinforced concrete elements, such as beams and slabs may be strengthened in flection through the application of complexs to their tenseness zones with the way of fibre analogue to that of high tensile emphasiss. The analysis for bound provinces for such elements may follow well-established processs for strengthened concrete constructions provided that ( a ) the part of external support is taken in to account decently and ( B ) particular consideration is given to the issue of bond between the concrete and the external support, through the usage of an appropriate bond theoretical account.

Failure manners may be divided in to two types: ( a ) those where full composite action of concrete and external support is maintained until concrete ranges oppressing in compaction or the composite stuff fails in tenseness. Such failure manners may besides be characterized as classical and ( B ) those where composite action is lost due to debonding of the composite stuff.Typical load-deflection curves for RC elements strengthened in flexural are given in Figure 9.Fig 9. Load-deflection curves for beams strengthened with FRP in flection.

Methods of flexural strengthening

Flexural strengthening of RC beams is by and large done by adhering an FRP sheet to the beam as shown in Figure 12. It is really of import that the RC beam should be prepared prior to the application of FRP sheet. Unevenness of the beam surface must be right. Bonding of FRP sheets to the bottom surface of the beam is the most common strengthening technique of RC beams for flection. There are fundamentally two strategies for the adhesive of FRP the sheets: a ) moisture lay-up B ) adhesive bonding of prefabricated FRP home base. The former method is the most normally used due to its greater flexibleness for field application. Epoxy rosin is applied to the concrete surface and FRP sheets are impregnated in topographic point utilizing rollers.

In the ulterior method prefabricated FRP home bases are cut harmonizing to the application and bonded to the RC beam by utilizing epoxy. The wet lay-up method is really sensitive to unevenness of the beam surface, which leads to debonding. On the other manus, the prefabricated FRP home base method, due to material uniformity and quality control is non sensitive to unevenness of beam surface. To forestall debonding FRP U-shaped strips can be bonded to the terminals of the sheets ( Figure 13 ) . However, in the most of the beam instances wrapping is non possible. It is noted that wrapping can detain debonding merely up to a certain bound ( Smith and Teng 2001 ) .Fig 12.

Flexural strengthening of RC beam by FRP sheetFig 13. Strengthened RC beam with FRP U-strip

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –

Shear beef uping

Shear strength of columns can be easy improved by wrapping with a uninterrupted sheet of FRP to organize a complete ring around the member. Shear strengthening of beam is more debatable since they are usually cast monolithically with slabs. This increases the trouble of grounding the FRP at the beam/slab junction and exacerbates the hazard of debonding failure. Nevertheless adhering FRP on either the side faces or the side faces and soffit, will supply some shear beef uping for such members. In both instances it is recommended that the FRP be paced such that the chief fibre orientation, I? , is either 45 IS or 90 ISto the longitudinal axis of the members.To cipher the shear opposition of the FRP, the design strain in the FRP must be evaluated. Its value depends on the failure manner of the reinforced member.

Basically failure can originate due to one of the three possible mechanisms, viz. :a ) loss of aggregative interlockB ) FRP rupturedegree Celsius ) Delamination of the FRP from concrete surface

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –

Shear beef uping

Shear strengthening of RC members ( e.g. column, beam, shear walls ) utilizing complexs may be provided by adhering the external support with the rule fiber way every bit parallel as practically possible to that of upper limit chief tensile emphasiss, so that the effectivity of the external support is maximized.Fig 10. Dependence of the composite stuff elastic modulus, Ef, on the fibre orientationFor the most common instance of structural members subjected to transverse tonss, that is perpendicular to the member axis.

The maximal chief emphasis flights in the shear-critical zones form an angle with the member axis which may be taken approximately equal to 45 IS . However it is usually more practical to attach the external support with the chief fiber way perpendicular to the member axis.Fig 11.

Conventional illustration of RC component strengthened in shear with externally bonded complexs: ( a ) sheets bonded to the web of beam ( B ) Wrapped strips applied to beam ( degree Celsius ) Four sided wrapper of columns

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Detailing with regard to beef uping lay-out

Flexural strengthening

Flexural strengthening is provided by axially oriented cloths of pultruded strips or cured in situ cloths bonded to the top or bottom faces of the member or to the sizes. In the anchorage zones no extra transverse support is required if equal anchorage is provided by bond emphasiss and debonding is resisted by concrete tensile emphasiss.

General recommendations

Some recommendations which should use ( Deutsches Institut pelt Bautechnik, 1998 ) :Maximal spacing sf, soap between strips should follow these restrictions:Sf, max a‰¤ 0.2 cubic decimeter ( fifty = span length )a‰¤ 5h ( H = entire deepness )a‰¤ 0.4 lc ( lc = length of cantilever )Minimal distance to the border of the beam should be to the concrete screen of internal support.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Shear beef uping

Shear strengthening can be provided by ( a ) factor made L-shaped CFRP strips ( B ) continues sheets. The externally bonded shear support by and large covers four or three sides of the elements, but in some instances merely two sides.

Appropriate encourage is strongly recommended. It is of import to observe that in rule there are two different instances: ( a ) proper anchorage of the shear strengthening system. ( B ) Side or U-shaped shear strengthening system. Anchorage failure, debonding failure and FRP break are accounted for in design through the effectual FRP strains.Proper anchorage means a to the full wrapped or a system that is decently anchored in the compaction zone.

Where partly possible, it is recommended to utilize for grounding the whole tallness of compaction zone to vouch an anchoring every bit good as possible. FRP strips at the lone sides of the beam are non recommended as in this instance there is a deficiency of anchorage in both the compaction and tenseness zone.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –

Shear strengthening of RC beam with FRPs

Methods of shear beef uping

Strengthening of RC beams in shear is done fundamentally in three different strategies: a ) by adhering of FRP sheets to the sides of the RC beam merely, B ) by adhering FRP U-strips to both the sides and the tenseness face of the RC beam ( U jacketing ) , c ) by wrapping FRP around the whole cross subdivision of the RC beam. While beef uping RC beams in shear, fiber orientation must be carefully chosen to command the shear clefts.

FRPs are strong merely in the fiber way. A suited strengthening method must be selected harmonizing to the: 1 ) handiness i.e. whether wrapping is possible or non 2 ) beef uping demand ( reversed cyclic burden or monotonic ) 3 ) How much addition in shear capacity is needed.Among three different strategies, side adhering merely is easiest to use and needs the least sum of FRP, but it is the most vulnerable to debonding and the least effectual. In U jacketing beam ends must be rounded. This strategy is less vulnerable to debonding compared to side adhering.

Although it is moving as mechanical ground tackle for flexural beef uping with FRP, it may necessitate mechanical ground tackles at the free terminals of the U. Among the three different strategies wrapping is the most effectual and less vulnerable to debonding. However, in most of the instances it is non executable or really hard due to the unavailability of at least one side of the beam.

Shear failure manners

There are fundamentally three types of shear failure manner occur in a RC beam strengthened with FRP:

a ) Shear failure with FRP rupture

This failure by and large occurs with a diagonal shear cleft. First a perpendicular flexural cleft occurs and propagates diagonally towards the burden point.

As the breadth of the cleft addition, the strain in the FRP addition and the FRP ruptures when it reaches its ultimate strain. Rupture of the FRP leads to brittle failure of the RC beam.

B ) Shear failure without FRP rupture

This is really similar to shear failure whit rupture, except that FRP does non tear and can transport tonss after he concrete fails ( Chajes et al.

1995 ) .

degree Celsius ) Shear failure due to FRP debonding

This is the most normally seen failure manner for side bonding and U jacketing ( Figure 16 ) . On the side of the beam debonding of FRP occurs foremost, and so beam fail in a brickle mode.Fig 16. Shear failure due to FRP debonding

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —


In the FRP installing is to stay effectual a study of the construction concentrating on the status of the bing substrate and likely cause of impairment is an indispensable demand. Prior to installing, the surface of concrete must be cleaned so that it is free of laitance and other stuff that are likely to impact the bond strength between the FRP and the concrete. Besides any crisp borders that are likely to damage the FRP should be removed.

The surface of fiber composite stuff may besides requires light scratch prior to the application of the adhesive. It is by and large necessary to command the environment in work country during the readying of the surface, the application of the adhesive and the subsequent hardening period. Besides the work site should be protected from wet and humidness. The adhering adhesive should be applied equally and the FRP stuff wrapped tightly over, avoiding any furrows and rolled to throw out and air.

Consequence of corner radius on the public presentation of externally bonded FRP support

Externally bonded FRP support is wrapped around concrete members in order to supply parturiency and/or shear strengthening. The demand for flexing the fibre over the member corners affects the public presentation of the FRP laminate and the efficiency of its confining/strengthening action.Based on literature reappraisal ( Xinbo Yang, Antonnio Nanni, Genda Chen, 2000 ) , it was found that merely a part of the CFRP laminate capacity was developed when failure occurred at the corner. Increasing the figure of plies from one to two somewhat improved the efficiency of the laminate.

Chemical bond between concrete and FRP sheet

Strengthening of concrete constructions with FRP has emerged as one of the effectual techniques. However, the effectivity of such beef uping system depends mostly on the public presentation of the interface between concrete and FRP in epoxy articulation. For beef uping design, the bond between concrete and FRP is the major factor.

The bond strength of such articulations depends on concrete strength, type and thickness of FRP and bonded length. FRP sheets can be bonded to external surface of constructions in different constellation, since they can follow contour of the construction easy. Further the application of FRP sheet is softly simple and rapid that does non required heavy machinery for raising and arrangement. Due to these advantages FRP sheets has emerged as one of the best suitable stuffs for beef uping concrete construction.

The public presentation of the reinforced system mostly depends on the behaviour of bond between concrete and FRP sheet in epoxy articulation. The failure of the system sometimes occurs from the bond line failure. Since FRP is a brickle stuff once it hardens ; the failure due to debonding of sheet from concrete is really sudden, which occurs without any warning. There have been a figure of surveies about portending emphasis between concrete and FRP sheet around the universe such as Bronsens & A ; Van Germert ( 1997 ) , Hariguchi & A ; Saeki ( 1997 ) and etc.Harmonizing to experiments which have done by Bimal Babu Adhikary the debonded CFRP retained some balls of concrete on their bonded surface. This suggests that the existent failure is slightly shearing-off of concrete merely below the CFRP sheets.

Thus the concrete surface tensile strength is one of the most of import factors in CFRP strengthened constructions. The surface tensile strength of concrete can be related to compressive strength of concrete. Anyway, the adhering emphasis between concrete and FRP sheets is governed by some parametric quantities such as Modulus of snap of FRP, thickness of FRP, figure of beds of FRP, concrete compressive strength, etc. There are a few expression to cipher adhering emphasis between concrete and FRP and besides effectual strain of FRP which have suggested by research workers. It needs separate reappraisal paper.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –

FRP rods

Alkali opposition of fibres, FRP rods and epoxy rosins

Deterioration of concrete constructions is a worldwide job today. Corrosion of reenforcing bars is a 1 of the major factors for concrete impairment.

Recently there have been a batch of researches in the usage of rods made of fibre reinforced polymers ( FRP ) as an alternate support in concrete construction. Much sort of FRP rods have been late developed to utilize them as supports in concrete. These rods are by and large made of C, aramid, glass and vinylon fibres. Since theses rods are corrosion cogent evidence and lightweight they are progressively being used for new concrete constructions using their advantages.There are few experimental consequences about lastingness of FRP rods in respect to their alkali opposition.

Based on experimental consequences which have done by Atsushi Sumida in 2000, the relationship between tensile strength and submergence period has different alterations for different types of FRP rods. The tensile strength remains slightly changeless in the instance of CFRP, AFRP rods, but there is a singular lessening in the strength for GFRP rods. VFRP rod shows a small alteration in its tensile strength. The Young ‘s modulus remains about the same even up to 2 old ages of submergence for all sorts of FRP rods. It was found that for CFRP, AFRP and GFRP the ultimate strains after 2 old ages of submergence were about the same as the original 1s. However GFRP rods, shows lessening in ultimate strain and at the terminal of 2 old ages the bead was about 75 % . These consequences show that the lastingness of GFRP rod is really hapless, whereas other FRP rods are satisfactory in their lastingness public presentation.The epoxy rosin has about changeless strength whereas vinylester rosin shows a diminishing tendency in strength with clip.

Stress-rupture of FRP

Stress-rupture is the procedure which leads to failure of the stuff if subjected to a sustained high burden. The stress-rupture behavior is strongly influenced by the sustained emphasis degree, the type of FRP and the environmental conditions.For a specific failure FRP, the clip to failure depends chiefly on two factors. The first factor is the ratio of the applied burden to the short term tensile strength.

If this ratio increases the clip to failure will diminish. The environment is the 2nd factor. For illustration lasting contact of a GFRP component with an alkalic solution-chemically similar to the concrete ‘s pore H2O, will decidedly damaged the fibres ensuing in a lessening of the failure clip.Stress-rupture is normally preceded by weirdo and can be thought of as a creep-to-failure which leads to the alternate name of creep-rupture.

The behavior of most hempen is characterized by an initial elastic response, followed by a reasonably rapid primary weirdo stage, a long comparatively slow secondary weirdo stage and a rapid third weirdo towards failure as shown in the fig.2.Fig.2. Creep behavior of FRP ( Thomas Telford, 2001 )

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –