& # 8230 ; About Marijuana Essay, Research PaperWeed, pot, joint, grass, pot, hash, herb, Mary Jane, marijuana, rotter, roar, kif, mobster ; these are all common names for the drug marihuana.
Marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug in the United States, which makes it a job. Certain functionaries believe that legalising this potentially harmful drug will work out the jobs that are associated with it. But that is non true. In fact, legalising marihuana would merely do the state of affairs much worse. Although many people argue both sides, it seems to come down to the inquiry of & # 8220 ; what will the people really use this substance for? & # 8221 ; Some say medical intents, others say merely for a speedy high, but, no affair what manner you look at it, marijuana is unsafe and it is non something Americans should hold freely being distributed on their streets.Arguments have been made that if marihuana is legalized so the pack wars and drug money violent deaths that go on will halt, along with the black market and condemnable activities that are related to drug gross revenues and usage.
In actuality, most instances of drug related force and offense are & # 8220 ; committed non merely because people want to purchase drugs, but more frequently because people use drugs & # 8221 ; ( Claim I 1 ) . Drugs alter a individual & # 8217 ; s behaviours, which initiates condemnable activity. Police officers can certify to the fact that the usage of drugs is frequently associated with violent offense behaviour, non needfully selling or purchasing them. In the long tally, legalisation will take to increased handiness, which will take to increased usage.
I Increased drug usage will do the statistics sing drug related offenses increase ; even if the drugs were bought lawfully. The Black market wouldn & # 8217 ; t travel off either. If the United States legalizes marihuanas, they are, traveling to hold to set up a set age for purchasing marihuana, and a certain authority that it can hold. If marihuanas were legal for individuals over the age of 18, for illustration, so the drug sellers would travel after those persons 17 and under. As for authority, drug sellers would happen ways to do their pot better than that lawfully allowed ( Claim I 1-2 ) . No affair what the authorities does to either aid or pacify the job, it & # 8217 ; s non traveling to travel off. And other people would happen ways to acquire their vaulting horse out of it excessively.Legalization of marihuana would besides take to increased usage and dependence.
When the United States legalized intoxicant and baccy usage it sent out a message to the people that it is something that is all right. Now, after long hours of research, the population knows that they aren & # 8217 ; t O.K.s and they aren & # 8217 ; t good for you. & # 8220 ; There are over 50 million nicotine nuts, 18 million alkies or job drinkers, and fewer than 2 million cocaine nuts in the United States. Cocaine is a much more habit-forming drug than intoxicant. If cocaine were lawfully available, as intoxicant and nicotine are now, the figure of cocaine maltreaters would likely lift to & # 8230 ; possibly 20 to 25 million & # 8221 ; ( Claim III 1 ) . Alaska tried to legalise marihuanas, stating that the province could non interfere with a individual & # 8217 ; s ownership of marihuana in his place for personal usage.
Because of this opinion, many Alaskans took it as a signal to & # 8220 ; light up & # 8221 ; , particularly the younger 1s even though the opinion was for those characters over 19 old ages of age. The University of Alaska did a survey on it and concluded that the province & # 8217 ; s 12 to 17-year-olds used marihuana at more than twice the national norm for their age group. As a consequence, the occupants of AlasKa voted to recriminalize the ownership of marihuana. For them, they believed that increased usage was excessively high a monetary value to pay for increased personal autonomies. One of the United States’ 50 provinces has already tried to legalise it, and it turned out to be a failure. The people said it was a failure. With this cognition the United States shouldn’t seek to enforce failure on the remainder of the 49 provinces ( Claim III 2 ) .
The biggest and most argued ground for legalisation of marihuana is that it purportedly helps people that have malignant neoplastic disease, AIDS, multiple induration, epilepsy, or glaucoma. The truth is that as of 1991, over 12,000 scientific surveies have been published on marihuana, and it has ne’er one time been shown to be safe or affectional for the intervention of any status. The National Institute of Health issued a study in March of 1992 saying that scientific surveies ne’er showed marihuanas to be safe or affectional as medical specialty and that there are much better and safer drugs available for all conditions considered. The National Eye Institute rejected marihuana, saying that there was no scientific grounds that it was safe or affectional in the intervention of glaucoma.
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders rejected marihuana, saying that no surveies proved it to hold good effects on patients with multiple induration. The National Institute of Dental Research rejected marihuana, saying that no surveies substantiate the claims that it can work as a analgesic. Finally, The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease rejected marihuana, saying that many of the carcinogens in its fume would be a wellness jeopardy for patients with compromised immune systems and people with AIDS.
Just what & # 8217 ; s in that fume? Over 2,000 chemicals such as H nitrile, ammonium hydroxide, C monoxide, ethanal, propanone, phenol, methyl phenol, naphthalene, and benzine. Most of these chemicals are toxic, and yet the United States wants to do them available for mundane usage. Marijuana is habit-forming, it affects the immune system, is known as a gateway drug to really harmful drugs such as cocaine, it can do malignant neoplastic disease of the lungs, oral cavity, lip, or lingua, Marijuana causes respiratory diseases, mental upsets like schizophrenic disorder, and is a major cause in accidents due to it & # 8217 ; s ability to hinder coordination and judgement. Furthermore babes of a female parent who smoke Marijuana can be born with leukaemia, low birth weight, and other abnormalcies. With all the negative effects marijuana has on the human organic structure, why would the authorities want to legalise it? ( Lapey M.
D. 1-2 ) ( Claim V 1-3 )Marijuana is illegal as of today and should remain that manner. Legalizing it would merely take to greater wellness jobs in today & # 8217 ; s population. Besides, legalisation of marihuana, like the legalisation of coffin nails and intoxicant, merely tells the people that it is okay for them to make it.
Thousands of medical surveies have shown that it does non make any good for anyone & # 8217 ; s organic structure and it should remain illegal to forestall it from making mass devastation on the population. The universe has adequate jobs that it is confronting ; allow & # 8217 ; s non do marihuana another one.Claim I. 15 April 2001 hypertext transfer protocol: //www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/legaliz/claim01.htm.
Claim III. 15 April 2001 hypertext transfer protocol: //www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/legaliz/claim03.htm.Claim V.
15 April 2001 hypertext transfer protocol: //www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/legaliz/claim05.htm.Lapey M.D. , Janet D.
& # 8220 ; Marijuana is NOT medicine & # 8221 ; . 15 April 2001 hypertext transfer protocol: //www.fmr.no/eng/ecad-medicine.html.