Last updated: June 19, 2019
Topic: SocietyRacism
Sample donated:

Interracial marriages vs. same-sex marriage are two very controversial topics. There are so many factors that may affect one’s view on these topics it becomes easy to see why they are very controversial. In society today interracial marriage isn’t considered as rare site anymore. As well as same sex couples or same sex marriages. A lot of people opposed against interracial marriage because race played a major factor.

Interracial marriage became a big concern in the late 1960’s in the case of Loving v. Virginia.With the segregation movement still into play it was an unlikely thing to see two people of the opposite race getting married.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Interracial marriages have had a hard period. They suffered not only from the prejudice of others, but also from inherent problems of differences between their respective cultures which combine with those already present in a marriage. As years progressed the law was passed so that people of the opposite race would be able to marry legally. Decades later the same issue arises but with a different stand point which would be same sex marriage. First, there is no comparison between sex and race.There is an enormous difference between men and women, but there are no differences between people of different races.

Men and women are naturally different, but blacks and whites (or whichever race) are inherently the same. Therefore, any forced separation by race can never be moral or even rational; on the other hand, separation by sex can be both morally desirable and rational. The second reason the comparable between opposing same-sex marriage and opposing interracial marriage is invalid is that conflict marriages between races is more of a norm in society opposing to a couple of the same gender.A lot of people oppose the legalization of gay marriages because they believe that it poses a serious threat to the institution of marriage itself. This issue is put into many different lights. Such as morals, family values and religion; and those of equality, constitutionality, and right to privacy. As religion takes part into homosexuality, Christians are against gay marriages because these marriages are against the nature that God has created.

Christians and non-Christians alike are made in the image of God. Christians are against gay marriages because it is a lie, and people are deceived.God did not create anyone homosexual. It is a lifestyle that a person chooses. However, the Church does not prohibit interracial marriage. Naturally marriage is a bond between a man and a woman. Natural marriage is the immune system of civilization. When our marriages are strong, our civilization is strong; when they are weak, individuals and communities suffer.

Nothing is wrong with interracial marriages because men and women are designed for one another, regardless of their racial backgrounds. But same-sex marriage is harmful because the human body was simply not designed for same sex relations.When observing these two topics first and foremost, we as a society must think of our future when an issue such as same sex marriage and interracial marriage comes in to play. Most importantly it is very detrimental on a child’s upbringing. Could it be easier for a child to say that they have parents of a different race? Or having two mothers or two fathers? The difficulty of both issues can be hard to explain. Neither topic could be easy to explain, so shouldn’t they both be treated equally? Is there really a difference between love of an interracial man and woman, or a same sex couple?Both groups fought for equality and some are still fighting. Love has no color or gender.

However, there are some moral values that should have a part in both. People who are against gay marriage and equality for gays always deny that there is any sort of parallel between their point and the racism of America’s history. The simple truth is, we see the unnaturalness of the unions, the importance of tradition, and the need to avoid social conflict which racists used to use against gay marriage and even against desegregation.There are so many similarities between these two issues.

Opponents claimed that interracial marriages were ‘unnatural’, that they were based on lust rather than love. All those old arguments are being recycled today. When interracial couples fought for the right to marry each other, were they asking for equal rights or special rights? They wanted the same rights as other couples, but religious conservatives insisted they really wanted special rights. After all, no one was allowed to marry members of another race, so all were treated equally.

We find the same arguments being made today and they are just as wrong now as they were then. What is most disturbing about this situation is just how similar their arguments are to the ones which were used to oppose interracial marriages and to support anti-miscegenation laws. There are no inherent racial differences; there are significant differences between the sexes.

To the extent that racial groups are different, they are only because their cultures differ. What really separates them from the racists of the past?