Last updated: May 14, 2019
Topic: ArtBooks
Sample donated:

Livent. a successful unrecorded amusement company. known for public presentations of Phantom of the Opera. Ragtime. and Sunset Boulevard. was sold in 1998 to purchasers that found the value the paid for the company was an semblance. Livent’s main fiscal officer. Maria Messina. who joined Livent in 1996 after functioning as its hearer at Deloitte & A ; Touche. had been immersed in what the Securities & A ; Exchange Commission ( SEC ) charges was a “multifaceted and permeant accounting fraud” ( “At Livent. ” 1999 ) . By utilizing particular package to transport out accounting uses. the top executives at Livent masked losingss and shifted costs. making consequences that enabled them to raise more that $ 179 million in public equity and debt markets.

Harmonizing to the SEC the uses were so thorough. the senior vice-president for finance. Gordon Eckstein. insisted that Livent maintain two sets of books. one to maintain path of Livent’s true fundss and one for the bogus Numberss. Maria may hold been kept in the dark while at Deloitte. but she admitted fall ining the strategy after her efforts to carry Mr. Eckstein to halt the fraud failed. Maria did non unwrap the uses to an foreigner until July 1998 when she met the new owner’s main executive officer. Roy Furman. and once more in August 1998. when she met with the new executive frailty president. Robert Wheeler. By this clip. Maria had non merely committed a felony offense. she besides destroyed her credibleness as a professional comptroller and in her words. her life. 1. Did Maria blow the whistling at the right clip? Why or why non?

Maria waited excessively long to blow the whistling and take action to unwrap the use of net incomes and fraud happening under her term of office at Livent. While it was sensible to first seek to turn to the issues internally. every bit shortly as it became evident direction was non interested in rectifying the uses. Maria should hold elevated her concerns and taken the appropriate actions in conformity with her professional accounting codifications. Her run of babe stairss and deficiency of bravery resulted in gaol clip. mulcts. and the loss of her Chartered Accountant appellation. 2. Was her planned response appropriate? Why or why non?

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The planned response in this instance was unequal and inappropriate. As a professional comptroller. Maria should hold taken action to describe the uses and fraud to the Board of Directors. audit commission. external hearers. or regulators every bit shortly as she realized accommodations were being made to pull strings the company’s net incomes and debt. When it became clear that direction was non interested in rectifying the state of affairs Maria should hold been prepared to move with unity. A professional comptroller is given the right to supply of import fiducial services to society because he or she undertakes to keep the trust inherit in the fiducial relationship. for this ground the comptroller must use their expertness with honestness. unity. and due attention in order to guarantee that those trusting on them can swear that proper attention is taken of their involvements ( Brooks & A ; Dunn. 2015. p. 355 ) . Maria’s planned response did non expose those features and her picks favored the individual paying her wage. 3. How would you propose she should hold dealt with the job?

Upon detecting the fraud. Maria should hold foremost sought to cover with the state of affairs internally. either by conveying her concerns to her higher-ups and/or Livent’s main internal hearer or the company conformity officer. If her attempts at that degree failed. the following measure would be to promote the issue to the CEO and Board of Directors or the audit commission. If Maria wasn’t able to cover with the issue internally. she could unwrap her concerns to the external hearers and appropriate regulators. Coming from Deloitte & A ; Touche. Maria worked on Livent’s audit in the twelvemonth prior to fall ining the company. She should hold felt compelled to convey the uses to the attending of the external hearers. If her efforts to promote concerns at the internal and external degree failed she could hold sought advice from the moralss officer for her professional accounting association or she could hold gone public with the information. As a professional history. Maria had a duty to the public involvement. If she was unable to keep that professional duty she should hold resigned her place after unwraping the uses. 4. Should whistle blowing be encouraged? Why or why non?

Whistle blowing should decidedly be encouraged. In many instances. accounting fraud has been discovered after an employee became a whistle blower. Appropriate plans should be in topographic point to protect employees who fear negative reverberations from the higher-ups. The being of such plans and processs encourages employees to come frontward because they convey the outlook that whistle blowing is the appropriate and right thing to make. In this instance. the SEC enforcement manager Richard Walker said it best. “A whistle blower is a good soldier to one individual and a individual who’s created a fraud to another. We charged them with fraud. ” ( “At Livent. ” 1999 ) . Assessment/Recommendations

This instance reveals the force per unit areas that are frequently brought to bear on professional comptrollers who discover use and fraud. and who must make up one’s mind what to make. and when to blow the whistling ( Brooks & A ; Dunn. 2015. p. 402 ) . The picks Maria Messina made took her from outside hearer to inside participant because she lacked the bravery to make the right thing at the right clip. A professional comptroller confronting a hard pick should do that pick so as to continue the trust inherent in the fiducial relationships. foremost with the populace. so with the profession. so with the client/employer. and eventually with the single professional. Maria could hold avoided gaol. mulcts. and clip off from her girl by staying by that professional codification.

At Livent. Is Fraud The Thing? ( 1999. February 14 ) . Retrieved January 16. 2015. from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. businessweek. com/stories/1999-02-14/at-livent-is-fraud-the-thing Brooks. L. J. . & A ; Dunn. P. ( 2015 ) . Business & A ; professional moralss for managers. executives & A ; comptrollers ( 7th ed. ) .