Macbeth Guilt Essay, Research PaperThis was an unwritten presentation, in which I prosecuted Macbeth. I received a classof A- , nevertheless was told that it was my existent presentation instead than my essaythat stopped me acquiring a higher class Ladies and Gentlemen, I will be brief.You have heard the testimonies and seen the grounds ; it is now clip for thedestiny of Macbeth to be decided. Today you have met tonss of informants testify,under curse, the suspect? s wholly good and honest character, and havepondered as to how the King of Scotland could perpetrate such atrociousnesss. However,unmistakable grounds opposes such testimonies and proves beyond sensibleuncertainty that the suspect Macbeth killed his King, Duncan the II of Scotland, hislife-long friend Banquo and Lady Macduff and her kids. Over the last sixmonths we have seen Macbeth degrade from a fearless and heroic warrior to aliquidator, a witting scoundrel who felt utmost guilt after killing his King outof pure greed and aspiration.

His retainer, as testified, overheard Macbeth expresshis guilt to his married woman on the dark of the slaying: ? I am afraid to believe what Ihold done ; Look on? T once more I dare not. ? Following his coronating at Scone,King Macbeth hired three bravos to slay his long-time friend Banquo, inorder to protect his Crown. It was after the slaying of Banquo that Macbeth soturned into an merciless, non-repentant autocrat.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

This adult male, one time heralded a hero,became the curse of Scotland and his people. The defence has tried to pull stringsfacts to carry you that Macbeth is non to fault for these slayings and hasplaced duty for these deceases on everyone from Lady Macbeth to theenchantresss, who on occasion conversed with the accused. You have heard testimoniesof the three enchantresss, who told us of their brushs with Macbeth. What kind ofadult male would tie in with such evil existences, and most of all, believe the bunkthey foresee? The enchantresss did non straight act upon Macbeth to assassinate hisKing, they merely speculated as to what the hereafter may keep and these anticipationsignited his overpowering aspiration to go King. These associations with theenchantresss bring serious uncertainties to the goodness of the suspect? s character.

Guesss that Lady Macbeth is responsible for Duncan? s slaying have beenmade by the defence. But blood found on this cloak hidden in Macbeth? squarters proves without uncertainty that it was Macbeth who really committed theslaying. He is finally to fault. The accusals made by Macbeth? s attorneiesthat Lady Macbeth pressured her hubby to assassinate Duncan are irrelevant. Itis unthinkable that such a brave and valiant soldier could be so weak as to beinfluenced by his married woman to perpetrate slaying, unless he had already considered makingit, or had something to derive from the decease of Duncan, such as the throne ofScotland. The defence has tried to convert you that Macbeth was insane at theclip of King Duncan? s slaying.

If he were non sane, would he hold been seen assuch a well-loved and brave soldier? Would he hold been so respected by hisKing to be honoured with the rubric of Thane of Cawdor, had he been badly at head?These impressions themselves are insane! Macbeth was sane and rational at the clipof the slaying! ? Yes, Macbeth did demo marks of mental unsoundness a hebdomad after theslaying at the feast, as testified by Ross, who attended the banquet anddescribed to you the accused? s unusual behavior. Could an guiltless adult male bedriven mad over a period of a hebdomad? It was his scruples, my friends, whichdrove him insane! After the pre-meditated slayings of Duncan and Banquo, theforce per unit areas of being King, and the mounting guilt of the slayings he had committed,were increasing. Overheard by his retainer, Macbeth said to his married woman? I am inblood, Stepp? vitamin D in so far? ? The mercantile establishment for his fury was Lady Macduff andher household. This pointless, and motiveless, slaughter shows the inhuman treatment andimmorality that has become a portion of Macbeth. He did non stand to derive anythingfrom the deceases of these guiltless people. No longer was he the honoured soldier,or the compassionate King, but the barbarous autocrat. We must halt devising alibisfor this cold-hearted adult male.

He was non influenced by his married woman or witchery. Hewas sane when he viciously murdered his King. He was influenced merely by hisaspiration and greed to go King ; he was influenced by his selfishness andhungriness for power. From hero to heartless autocrat, this is the calamity of Macbeth.Ladies and Gentlemen, his clip has come. Macbeth? s destiny lies in your custodies.

Itrust that you will do the right judgement.