Last updated: August 18, 2019
Topic: Business
Sample donated:

Answer: 1

The combination of decision domain and governance archetype are correlated in the sense that both influences one another and makes sure that effective IT decision making strategy follows.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Weill and Ross (2005) define a matrix to align the decision making to governance archetype.

 

The IT principals, architecture, investments and business application needs are analyzed by the senior management of the business alone and makes sure that all the decisions are taken effectively to manage the needs of the business and offer them scalability management. The decision making to be performed for the alignment of IT strategy towards business structure would make the entire decision scenario quite fulfilling (See table 1 in appendix). The IT department would make sure that the strategies fall in place.

 

The handling of the various decision domains by more than one governance prototype makes them equally important to get their attention and skill in decision making. In case to IZL, the management and decision making for IT is distributed to various levels so that the corporation is able to get the right decision and that can be achieved from knowing the deep thoughts of the departments which would be enveloped by the information system.

 

The decision making for the governance models discussed (see table 1 in appendix) would make sure that various IT decision domains are catered for their entire architecture and strategies to be taken into account for the progress of the firm and the various options for getting the firms strategy into place.

 

It is distributed in the sense that the decision making rests on the hand of the various domains and takes care of the decision methods for getting the IT principals, management and its strategies to make an impact. For a particular governance prototype (see table 1 of appendix) the model for compliance would result in handling the IT decision and strategies to be managed.

 

Answer: 2

IZL must wind up its governance structure in feudal section which is not giving any input and output to the organization in its IT decision making.

 

The contribution of the business monarchy is almost towards every direction in the business (See table 2 in appendix). IT monarchy takes up IT architecture and infrastructural strategies which form a good portion of the IT decision making process.

 

The various other governance models are taken apart for the right presentation of the IT decision making and the various types presented for managing the information systems strategy planning.

 

Federal and IT duopoly are close competitors to wind up their stand for the governance portion and makes them sure that enough judgment is passed from the model and that does not meet for IZL. In eliminating one of them, we desire to understand the various implications of it in the IZL Corporation. The matter of concern would be to strategize the various aspects of decision making before it makes the ultimate stand.

 

The topic would be hinted at is the Feudal model which makes sure that non of the IT decision domain falls in its place and is better to be winded up.

 
References

Weill and Ross (2005). A Matrixed Approach to Designing IT Governance. MIT Sloan Management Review, vol 6, no: 2.
Appendix

Table: 1

Decision Domain
Governance Archetype
IT Principals
IT Architecture and Investment
IT Infrastructure Strategies
Business Application needs
Business Monarchy
?
? (investment)

?
IT Monarchy

? (architecture)
?

Federal

IT Duopoly

?
?
Feudal

?
Table: 2

Decision Domain
Governance Archetype
IT Principals
IT Architecture and Investment
IT Infrastructure Strategies
Business Application needs
Business Monarchy
?
? (investment)

?
IT Monarchy

? (architecture)
?

Federal

?
?
IT Duopoly

?
?
Feudal