Since the 1960’s, much of the organisation theory authorship is a ne’er – stoping argument between the machine / organ analogies, and efforts to develop growing theoretical accounts of how simple mechanistic signifiers can turn into the more complex organic signifiers. This survey approaches this mechanistic – organic dichotomy from a storryelling position: Example in manegement. The manegement literature and illustration are resources for better understanding what passes for acceptable duologue within modern administration. Example are a possible beginning for farther research because they reveal what ideologically acceptable on the one manus and what one the other is considered by directors as acceptable terrain for controversy. Analyzing the exemplum might turn out to be an efficient agencies of better understanding how maneragial capitalist economy is altering because analysis reveals the ideological bounds of what can be told with culturel authorization to groups of directors.
From Mechanical Managament to Organic Managament
Managament ; is a occupation that everyone desires. There are some people they have the thought that managament is merely power and authorization. This people wants to make their marks and ends. They are capable to make everything for illustration to kill person for merely making their marks. Sometimes 1000000s of people have suffered from the authoritiess merely because of their aspirations. Or possibly they were merely the victim of their ignorence or their devotedness to the authorities.
Presents, cognition has become more of import than power.Different types of communicating between states are limitless.
That ‘s why the logic and system of managament has changed. Managament has changed from machinist to organic.
What is the Mechanic Managament?
Mechanic sytsems are stable. Largely they fit to an changeless area.Mechanic managament looks like the bureaucratic construction.
The characteristics of the Mechanic managament is as following ;
– There are specialised undertakings
– There are purely defined responsibilities, undertakings and technic methods
– There is a purely hierarchal construction
– All the informations are collected in the senior managamnet
– There is perpendicular communicating
OrganA±c system has more flexible construction than others. It can be consistent with altering state of affairs. This system use for new and unexpected working group. This system is utilizing by company which can non work in hierarchal. We can set in order organic system ‘s map.
1 ) It can supply part, experience, information to mission in the organisation.
2 ) Redefine mission and ordinance
3 ) Supervision, authorithy, organisation in communicating
4 ) Information which has to be enlargement all acto r. Such as emplooyer, director.
5 ) Valid for horizontal communicating.
6 ) Communication, direction, bases on information alternatively of determination.
Organic system is non hierarchal if we compare organic system and mechanic system. Manager have a say in the system. Manager say to workers: ‘ You have to work so difficult. ‘ Workers can be motivated by money. Workers prevent from take a duty. Workers enjoy the vacation. Workers can fiddle every clip. Manager has to command them. At least it looks like from exterior. Money is the most of import thing for the workers. Because all determinations are taking by director. There is no cooperation. Today mechanic direction is diminishing. Because this method is non available for this period. The people want to give an sentiment. In thA±s system, merely director can give an sentiment. Workers merely do routin things. Workers merely fill work-time. They do n’t wish work. By and large, they do non work so much. They do non desire to work so much. They prevent from work. They ever think the vacation. Because there is no duty for workers. Workers should be controlled by directors. There is perpendicular communicating. Manager and workers ne’er meet. Manager give order to workers thanks to chief. Manager can roll up to the information. Workers merely do their occupations. But in some working group, the mechanic system can be work. Some working groups need the hierarchial construction. Organic system does non work for those groups. Because it needs more dicipline and less directors.
Organizations can be in a machinist or in a organic manner. Or some undertakings could be types of machinist or organic.
-In mechanical constructions every place on the house is defined really elaborate, cleary and technicaly. The connexions in the organisation are vertically.
-In organic structures the definition of the occupation is flexible and short.Duties, maps, methods and governments can alter all the clip. Relationss and communications are in a horizontal manner and invariably in treatment.
– Machinist Organizations ;
– Enviromental conditions are still and balanced
– The velocity of alteration should be vary decelerate
– Organic Organizations
– Enviromental conditions are altering really fast and continious.
1.CHANGE IN THE EXECUTIVE’S PERSPECTIVE
A alteration in a system does non intend anything without a logical alteration. So, it has to be a alteration in executive’s position. In this alteration the system has to derive some new significances. The executive director has to accept his workers as a teammate to transport out a intent. Not to see them as a tool or a machine.
In old and mechanic apprehensiveness, the executive attempts to make all plants and give all determinations by himself. Workers have right to talk about fiddling inside informations when the executive does non hold adequate clip. Worker is seen as person who likes money, vacations and who afraids of duty. Worker must been followed for every minute because he can easy mouse out from the work.
In organic apprehensiveness, executive-worker relationship is based on common trust. Worker is been accepted a individual who does his work in pleasance. Worker spends attempt to be a professional in bussines. The executive respects his thought. His birthrate grows up when worker acquire a opportunity.
In executive – worker relationship, mechanic system causes a barbarous rhythm but organic system causes a productive rhythm. If the executive director does non swear the worker and sees him as a machine, the worker loses his ego assurance. And worker thinks that he has to obey his executive. But in new system, worker has right to talk so he tries to be a portion of bussines and deserves executive’s trust. He thinks that contributes to every success. And this is really of import motive for worker. Another benefit of the system is, if a undertaking become unsuccessful, worker can non fault anybody because he has an thought in that undertaking excessively.
Even in our politic life senators do non hold right to talk at all. However in Matsu Sita company ( owns panasonic, national.. ) in 1975 63.000 worker produced 663.475 thoughts. In 1991 95000 worker produced 4 million thoughts.
If we want to protect our national worths and if we want to maintain up with the universe, we have consider more and we have to acquire rid of being unresponsive majorities.
Its a sad state of affairs, because the western universe have reached our worths by test and mistake methods but we can non make our ain methods for centuries. But it is a fact …
2. Change IN THE ORGANIZATION SYSTEM
At foremost, this alteration is traveling to be seen like the rights the executive give the workers, but over clip this alteration will be systematical and traveling to be perceived as normal. In this alteration, planning is traveling to be a teamwork. In this new system attending will take topographic point of the obeisance and workers will command each other. Human relationship will be more popular, the executive directors will carry the workers, they are non traveling to give them orders.
A individual who works in organic system, attempts to make a work in best manner and attempts to make the best work that he can make. In mechanic system the 2nd one is non of import so much. New system makes it possible to give determinations in application country but in old system the workers wait orders from the centre and this is waste of clip. In the new system the attendence of workers and the insights are traveling to assist to happen the best. One of the of import benefits of organic system is that the executive director can give some highly of import chances to workers like general coordination, strategic planning …
We can non state that the worlds and organisations can utilize mechanic or organic system 100 % . Even this proportion could alter under some factors like quality of executive-worker, their ages and some other grounds.
With widespreading of the organic system mastership gets out from being a power beginning. While communicating webs decreases the importance of the boundary lines, the organic system reduces the authorization of being an executive on worlds. In the new system, the people could be an executive with their cognitions, experiences and ego forsakings. The workers who thinks like ‘’ I do my occupation and one addition my money’’ will be eleminated in this system. Local administrations will lift up and bureaucratism will free power. So the democratic worths will distribute over the society.
We are so far behind the western about the mastership and audience.
– Grouping these activities meaningful and effectual
– Staging these groups by specific organisation and places and
– Delegate the employees to these pozitions
These codifications included to title
In other words forming agencies, distinction of the perpendicular, horizontal and spacial by the realize the purpose for Works to make. 3.At the terminal of that differentation coordination will be happen. So we can understand that organizing is differatation and making the coordination. In coordination distrubition of the authorization is effectual.
Foundation Stone of the organisation is specify of organisation places. Namely garnering the Works to make creates places. basic measure of that work:
Specify of the Works to make
Specify of the authorization that future employee has.
Specify of the which abilities, cognition and accomplishments that employee should has.
Therefore you’ll appear “ forma l” organizationa pozition none related with individual.
Subsequently sections will be appear by associating these places by themselves. And so organisation construction can be Express by scheme.
Actually design of the organisation has same intending with forming. But sometimes we can see that use of design of the organisation and organisation have same significance. Mainly organiaztion elements that will be design are:
In recent old ages, thin and simple web direction patterns is seen as one of the organisations, new developments such as new organisational hierarchy and self-governing, with decision-making footing did non cut down the importance of the relationship between degrees of the organisation. These developments in our position, bearing the features of the different phases of the employees before the determination to be faced with state of affairss caused. So for illustration, a self-governing within the squad a individual sometimes recruited straight confronting, sometimes strategic belongings overriding, sometimes wholly under conditions of uncertainness to do a pick determinations necessitating provinces. in the manner of a ‘cross functional squad ‘ working in a individual, for illustration, more before the mid-level characteristics of the determinations adopted determinations will be faced with state of affairss involved.
Forming or forming community activities related to the creative activity of organisational construction, a procedure refers. This procedure ;
– It significantly and efficaciously to group activities
– These groups and places to do certain organisational degrees and places ( places ) to delegate that work includes the phases.
In other words, to form work to be done to carry through the end of the perpendicular, horizontal and spatially differentiated.Therefore referred to the terminal of a distinction with it will be because of to form coordination, distinction and guaranting coordination can understand. Relates to the coordination degeneration.
Mechanistic and organic organisations are opposite terminals of a continuum of organisational construction possibilities. They represent pure types non needfully found in existent life. Mechanistic organisations are efficient, stiff, predictable, and standardised organisations. In peculiar, mechanistic organisations are characterized by a stiff hierarchy ; high degrees of formalisation ; a heavy trust on regulations, policies, and processs ; perpendicular specialisation ; centralized determination devising ; downward communicating flows ; and narrowly defined undertakings. In contrast, organic organisations are flexible, adaptable, and squad directed. Specifically, organic organisations are characterized by weak or multiple hierarchies ; low degrees of formalisation ; loose regulations, policies, and processs ; horizontal specialisation ; decentralized determination devising ; communicating flows in all waies ; and fluidness of undertakings adaptable to altering conditions. The most distinguishable difference between the two organisational constructions is based on the effectivity standards of each theoretical account. Whereas mechanistic organisations seek to maximise efficiency and standardisation, organic organisations seek to maximise satisfaction and development.
Hugh J. Arnold – Daniel C. Feldman, Organizational Behaviour, ( McGraw – Hill Series in Management )
Phillip K. Duncan, Current Topics in Organizational Behavior Managemenet, ( 1982, United States of America )
Henry Tosi, Massimo Pilati – Pull offing Organizational Behavior, Individuals, Teams, Organization and Management ( 2011, United Kingdom )
Kae H. Chung, Leon C. Megginson – Organizational Behavior, Developing Managerial Skills, Harper & A ; Row ( 1981 )
Rae Andre – Organizational Behavior, An Introduction to Your Life in Organizations, Pearson International Edition, Business And Economics ( 2008 )
Colquitt / LePine / Wesson, Organizational Behavior – Essentials for Improving Performance and Commitment, McGraw-Hill International Edition ( United States of America )
Robert E. Callahan, C. Patrick Fleenor, Harry R. Knudson, Understanding Organizational Behavior – A Managerial Viewpoint
Donald D. White, David A. Bednar, Organizational Behavior, Understanding and Pull offing Peoples at Work ( United States of America )
Jennifer M. George, Gareth R. Jones – Organizational Behavior, Understanding and Managing