In 2002 a series of ailments were filed against the McDonald’s corporation. The complainants who filed the ailments claimed that McDonald’s caused their fleshiness ( USDC ) . This case raised a surprisingly controversial inquiry of corporate versus personal duty. Is McDonalds truly to fault for these teens weight jobs? The reply is no. fleshiness is perfectly a affair of personal duty. Mcdonalds publicizing did non coerce the complainants into their eating house or force feed them dual cheeseburgers. It surely did non eliminate the complainants knowledge about the importance of eating right and populating a healthy life style. The thought that fleshiness could be considered a affair of corporate duty threatens to sabotage the American people’s right to take how they will populate their lives.
Peoples who believe that McDonalds below the belt advertises to kids to non recognize that it is within the companies rights to advertise freely. The first amendment of the fundamental law protects freedom of address. and this includes commercial advertisement ( Briant ) . The huge bulk of companies advertises to kids to a certain extent. This is because it works. Children are really easy to publicize to with the usage of playthings or characters. and they are really susceptible to it ( BrandConsultant ) . Besides. companies are seeking to construct womb-to-tomb consumers. This is a selling scheme. non use. Whether or non the advertised point is appropriate for the kid is the occupation of the parent. They are the 1s who are responsible for the kid. and it is their occupation to supervise what their kid is acquiring. or in this instance eating ( York ) . Parents besides should be the 1s who teach their kids how to populate a healthy and active life style. It is a fact that children’s determination devising accomplishments are ill developed. and that is why they are cared for until they are grownups ( JJDPA ) . Until that point. it is the parents occupation to look out for the best involvement of the kid.
McDonalds besides has advertising that is geared towards older people. such as the Monopoly game pieces and assorted sweepstakes. These competitions are for grownups. people who have full control of their mental modules and are capable of make up one’s minding whether or non to take part.
It is common fact that nutrient in moderateness plays a cardinal portion in a individuals wellness ( Freese ) . This is something that is being taught to kids from an early age ( 8 ) . It is obvious that in order to acquire proper nutrition. one can non eat the same thing everyday. and McDonalds has ne’er stated that it is. There is no grounds that suggest that little parts of McDonalds when paired with an otherwise healthy life style would be damaging to 1s wellness. Besides. it is common cognition that fast nutrient is non good to a person’s wellness. It is full of fat and Calories. and eating to much of it is non good ( 9. 7 ) . Eating McDonalds can non be straight linked to fleshiness. which is one of the things that the complainants attorneies would hold to turn out if they want to do a legitimate instance. There are many factors that can take to fleshiness. Geneticss and a sedentary life style are a few of them. McDonalds can non be blamed for their clients other life picks ( Freese. MightyMom ) . Interestingly. a film maker named Soso Whaley did a docudrama called Downsize Me. that went against many thoughts in the movie Super Size Me. Like the adult male in Super Size Me. she ate off merely the McDonalds bill of fare for 30 yearss and really lost 10 lbs and cut down her cholesterin. She says all she did was bound Calorie consumption and exercising reasonably a few times a hebdomad ( Soso ) .
The mean individual knows that the lone manner to battle fleshiness is with diet and exercising ( Freese ) . If one limits their consumption of Calories and increases the Calories that they burn. they will lose weight. Peoples know when they are deriving weight. It is each person’s duty to take attention of their ain wellness and this includes commanding their weight and altering their lifestyle wonts. McDonalds should non be held responsible for the mean Americans unwillingness to take duty for themselves.
There is besides a inquiry of motor environing this issue. The attorneies that are actioning nutrient corporations like McDonalds are merely making it for the hope of a large payout in the terminal. That is why they are traveling after successful corporations that have a batch of money alternatively of little concerns ( Freese ) . It is non McDonalds that is working its clients but attorneies who are working McDonalds. These attorneies are non concerned with the well being of American. That is non why they take these instances. The attorneies are making this merely for the money they can gain from it. McDonalds makes nutrient. occupations. and chances for many people that they would non otherwise have. They provided over 650. 000 occupations for people in the United States in 2011 and that figure has merely increased. ( Smith ) .
There is a large job with faulting corporations for flesh outing America. If people are traveling to tribunal and doing the instance that they are excessively weak to make up one’s mind for themselves what they are traveling to eat. how can they anticipate anyone to take them earnestly once more? As Duane Freese. writer of the article Frankensuits says “personal duty is the foundation on which all autonomy is built” . If people give in to the promise of money and the opportunity to fault person else for their irresponsibleness. they begin down a really slippy incline. These people are acknowledging to the authorities that they can non take for themselves. If that is true. so the existent solution is to criminalize all debris nutrient. Twinkies. Doritos. and potato french friess should be banned. because they are alluring the state that has no self-denial. Peoples need to take duty for their ain actions.
This claim that fast nutrient is responsible for doing America corpulent is pathetic and harmful to society. McDonalds is non pull stringsing kids with their advertizements. they are merely providing to what their clients want. They can non be blamed for that. The McDonalds corporation would non be every bit successful as it is today if people did non give it their concern. The bottom line is. people have encephalons for a ground. they should set them to better usage than merely calculating out ways to manus off incrimination to large corporations. If people truly want to fiddle their duties as persons so they should be prepared for the backlash- ultimate control for the authorities.