The 20 respondents were subjected into a study questionnaire that consists of 20 seven inquiries. The first portion is sing their personal information such as gender, current matrimonial position and others. The 2nd portion is sing their current wellness status every bit good as their twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours activities.

The 3rd portion is sing their perceptual experience on Alzheimer ‘s disease and in conclusion, their feelings towards the disease.The information gathered were subjected into the Cronbach ‘s Alpha ; Factor Analysis and One-Way Analysis of Variance ( ANOVA ) as agencies of analysis of informations. The research worker used the SPSS as the tool for the analysis of such.Cronbach ‘s AlphaNormally, the Cronbach ‘s Alpha dependability coefficient ranges between 0-1. However, there is no existent bound for the coefficient.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The closer Cronbach ‘s alpha coefficient is to 1.0 the greater the internal consistence of the points in the graduated table. Based upon the expression _ = rk / [ 1 + ( k -1 ) R ] where K is the figure of points considered and R is the mean of the inter-item correlativities the size of alpha is determined by both the figure of points in the graduated table and the average inter-item correlativities. George and Mallery ( 2003 ) provide the undermentioned regulations of pollex: “ _ & gt ; .9 – Excellent, _ & gt ; .

8 – Good, _ & gt ; .7 – Acceptable, _ & gt ; .6 – Questionable, _ & gt ; .5 – Poor, and_ & lt ; .5 – Unacceptable ” .In the instance of the obtained informations, the dependability coefficient is.887 which indicates good dependability coefficient.

While increasing the value of alpha is partly dependent upon the figure of points in the graduated table, it should be noted that this has decreasing returns. It should besides be noted that an alpha of.8 is likely a sensible end. It should besides be noted that while a high value for Cronbach ‘s alpha indicates good internal consistence of the points in the graduated table, it does non intend that the graduated table is unidimensional. The dimensionality of the graduated table can be computed utilizing the factor analysis which will be discussed in the following subdivision.Factor AnalysisThe method followed here was to first analyze the initial responses of the participants with a position to choosing a subset of features that might act upon farther responses. Then, study responses were analysed at the point degree, utilizing figures, tabular arraies, or text entirely, to supply a first feeling.

These point degree responses were scrutinised for underlying forms via factor analytic processs ( Note that all processs reported here utilise SPSS ) . A requirement for including an point was that responses were non excessively severely skewed ( i.e.

, 90 % or more of responses clustered in individual cell ) and that more by and large, the degree of response to that point was non deficient ( & lt ; 15-20 % ) to destabilize analysis. The factors identified in this manner correspond to the primary subjects or latent variables to which letter writers seem to be reacting in footings of assorted related points.The protocol adopted here for factor analysis was to utilize default scenes ab initio ( Principal Axis Factor – PAF ) and to revolve the matrix of burdens to obtain extraneous ( independent ) factors ( Varimax rotary motion ) . The premier end of factor analysis is to individuality simple ( points loadings & gt ; 0.30 on merely one factor ) that are explainable, presuming that points are factorable ( The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin step of trying adequateness trials whether the partial correlativities among variables are little. Bartlett ‘s trial of sphericalness trials whether the correlativity matrix is an individuality matrix, bespeaking that the factor theoretical account is inappropriate ) .Once clearly defined and explainable factors had been identified ( Factor loadings = & gt ; .10 were illustrated via an included tabular array even though merely point burdens & gt ; 0.

30 were considered relevant to factor burdens ) , and responses related to these factors were saved in the signifier of factor tonss. These Bartlett factor tonss are tantamount to sub-scale or scale tonss with agencies of nothing and standard divergences of one ( z-scores ) , and with participants credited with separate tonss in relation to each identified factor.A Principal Axis Factor ( PAF ) with a Varimax ( extraneous ) rotary motion of 22 of the 24 Likert scale inquiries from this study questionnaire was conducted on informations gathered from 20 participants. An scrutiny of the Kaiser-Meyer Olkin step of trying adequateness suggested that the sample was factorable ( KMO=.

698 ) .One Way AnovaOne – manner Analysis of Variance ( ANOVA ) is done with the dependant variable which is the groups perceptual experience and attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease as compared with the independent variables which are their gender, description/race, faith, current employment position, highest degree of instruction, and current matrimonial position.Gender vs. the Perceptions and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressiveBetween Groups1.15211.1526.806.

018Within Groups3.04818.169Entire4.20019Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishmentsBetween Groups.

0101.010.041.842Within Groups4.19018.233Entire4.

20019more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult femalesBetween Groups.0601.060.290.597Within Groups3.

69018.205Entire3.75019Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of agingBetween Groups.0101.

010.041.842Within Groups4.19018.233Entire4.

20019does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.1931.193.797.384Within Groups4.35718.242Entire4.55019patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups.

1931.193.797.384Within Groups4.35718.242Entire4.

55019kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.0601.060.290.597Within Groups3.69018.205Entire3.

75019there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.1171.1172.520.130Within Groups.

83318.046Entire.95019concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.4021.402.170.

685Within Groups42.548182.364Entire42.95019as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups1.

26011.260.819.377Within Groups27.

690181.538Entire28.95019no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups3.08613.

0861.869.188Within Groups29.714181.651Entire32.

80019I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friendsBetween Groups1.37111.371.900.355Within Groups27.429181.524Entire28.80019I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regardBetween Groups.

4021.402.295.594Within Groups24.548181.364Entire24.95019people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelingsBetween Groups2.59312.

5932.542.128Within Groups18.357181.020Entire20.95019I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have themBetween Groups4.00214.

0024.354.051Within Groups16.54818.

919Entire20.55019Table 1 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ gender into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.018 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.051 degree of significance.Description/Race vs. the Perceptions and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressiveBetween Groups.

5161.5162.520.130Within Groups3.

68418.205Entire4.20019Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishmentsBetween Groups.0951.095.415.527Within Groups4.10518.

228Entire4.20019more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult femalesBetween Groups.5921.5923.

375.083Within Groups3.15818.175Entire3.75019Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of agingBetween Groups.

0951.095.415.

527Within Groups4.10518.228Entire4.20019does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.

1291.129.525.

478Within Groups4.42118.246Entire4.55019patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups.4451.4451.950.180Within Groups4.

10518.228Entire4.55019kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.5921.5923.375.083Within Groups3.15818.

175Entire3.75019there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.0031.003.

050.826Within Groups.94718.053Entire.

95019concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.9501.950.407.531Within Groups42.000182.333Entire42.95019as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.

2131.213.134.719Within Groups28.737181.

596Entire28.95019no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups2.69512.6951.611.220Within Groups30.105181.673Entire32.

80019I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friendsBetween Groups6.06316.0634.800.042Within Groups22.

737181.263Entire28.80019I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regardBetween Groups1.16111.

161.878.361Within Groups23.789181.322Entire24.95019people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelingsBetween Groups.2131.

213.185.672Within Groups20.737181.152Entire20.

95019I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have themBetween Groups.0241.024.

021.887Within Groups20.526181.140Entire20.55019Table 2 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ race description into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.130 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.887 degree of significance.

Religion vs. the Perceptions and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressiveBetween Groups.

7253.2421.113.373Within Groups3.47516.217Entire4.20019Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishmentsBetween Groups1.4253.

4752.739.078Within Groups2.

77516.173Entire4.20019more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult femalesBetween Groups.6503.

2171.118.371Within Groups3.10016.

194Entire3.75019Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of agingBetween Groups.2253.075.302.824Within Groups3.97516.

248Entire4.20019does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.2753.092.343.795Within Groups4.

27516.267Entire4.55019patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups.5753.192.

771.527Within Groups3.97516.248Entire4.55019kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.6503.2171.

118.371Within Groups3.10016.194Entire3.75019there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.0753.

025.457.716Within Groups.87516.055Entire.95019concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups7.05032.

3501.047.399Within Groups35.

900162.244Entire42.95019as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups3.85031.

283.818.503Within Groups25.100161.569Entire28.95019no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups3.42531.

142.622.611Within Groups29.375161.

836Entire32.80019I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friendsBetween Groups9.52533.1752.636.

085Within Groups19.275161.205Entire28.80019I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regardBetween Groups4.67531.

5581.230.331Within Groups20.

275161.267Entire24.95019people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelingsBetween Groups.

6753.225.178.910Within Groups20.275161.267Entire20.

95019I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have themBetween Groups2.1503.717.623.610Within Groups18.

400161.150Entire20.55019Table 3 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ faith into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.373 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.

610 degree of significance.Current Employment Status vs. the Perception and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressiveBetween Groups.7633.2541.183.347Within Groups3.

43816.215Entire4.20019Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishmentsBetween Groups1.2003.4002.133.136Within Groups3.

00016.188Entire4.20019more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult femalesBetween Groups.3133.

104.485.698Within Groups3.43816.

215Entire3.75019Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of agingBetween Groups1.2003.4002.

133.136Within Groups3.00016.188Entire4.

20019does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.8003.2671.138.364Within Groups3.75016.234Entire4.55019patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups.

8003.2671.138.364Within Groups3.75016.234Entire4.55019kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.7503.2501.333.299Within Groups3.00016.188Entire3.75019there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.9503.317

.

.

Within Groups.00016.000Entire.95019concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups9.45033.1501.504.251Within Groups33.500162.094Entire42.95019as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.7003.233.132.940Within Groups28.250161.766Entire28.95019no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups2.8633.954.510.681Within Groups29.938161.871Entire32.80019I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friendsBetween Groups5.80031.9331.345.295Within Groups23.000161.438Entire28.80019I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regardBetween Groups3.20031.067.785.520Within Groups21.750161.359Entire24.95019people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelingsBetween Groups.7003.233.184.905Within Groups20.250161.266Entire20.95019I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have themBetween Groups4.11331.3711.334.298Within Groups16.438161.027Entire20.55019Table 4 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ current employment into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.347 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.298 degree of significance.Highest Level of Education vs. the Perception and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressiveBetween Groups.8434.211.941.467Within Groups3.35715.224Entire4.20019Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishmentsBetween Groups.8434.211.941.467Within Groups3.35715.224Entire4.20019more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult femalesBetween Groups.5604.140.658.631Within Groups3.19015.213Entire3.75019Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of agingBetween Groups.8434.211.941.467Within Groups3.35715.224Entire4.20019does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups1.0024.2511.060.410Within Groups3.54815.237Entire4.55019patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups.7524.188.743.577Within Groups3.79815.253Entire4.55019kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.8214.2051.052.414Within Groups2.92915.195Entire3.75019there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.1174.029.525.719Within Groups.83315.056Entire.95019concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups13.40243.3511.701.202Within Groups29.548151.970Entire42.95019as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups9.02142.2551.698.203Within Groups19.929151.329Entire28.95019no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups3.7884.947.490.743Within Groups29.012151.934Entire32.80019I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friendsBetween Groups5.11041.277.809.539Within Groups23.690151.579Entire28.80019I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regardBetween Groups2.2004.550.363.831Within Groups22.750151.517Entire24.95019people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelingsBetween Groups5.11741.2791.212.347Within Groups15.833151.056Entire20.95019I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have themBetween Groups6.28841.5721.653.213Within Groups14.26215.951Entire20.55019Table 4 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ highest degree of instruction into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.467 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.213 degree of significance.Current Marital Status vs. the Perception and AttitudeTable 4 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ current matrimonial position into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.116 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.633 degree of significance.

Analysis of variance

Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressiveBetween Groups1.5614.3902.218.116Within Groups2.63915.176Entire4.20019Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishmentsBetween Groups1.3114.3281.702.202Within Groups2.88915.193Entire4.20019more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult femalesBetween Groups.4444.111.504.733Within Groups3.30615.220Entire3.75019Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of agingBetween Groups1.8114.4532.843.061Within Groups2.38915.159Entire4.20019does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups1.2444.3111.412.278Within Groups3.30615.220Entire4.55019patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups1.8004.4502.455.091Within Groups2.75015.183Entire4.55019kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.6944.174.852.514Within Groups3.05615.204Entire3.75019there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups.2004.0501.000.438Within Groups.75015.050Entire.95019concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups4.95041.238.488.744Within Groups38.000152.533Entire42.95019as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s diseaseBetween Groups6.64441.6611.117.385Within Groups22.306151.487Entire28.95019no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘sBetween Groups.9944.249.117.974Within Groups31.806152.120Entire32.80019I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friendsBetween Groups8.74442.1861.635.217Within Groups20.056151.337Entire28.80019I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regardBetween Groups2.7004.675.455.767Within Groups22.250151.483Entire24.95019people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelingsBetween Groups4.72841.1821.093.395Within Groups16.222151.081Entire20.95019I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have themBetween Groups3.0504.763.654.633Within Groups17.500151.167Entire20.55019DiscussionBased on the consequences of the study, bulk of the respondents have a positive attitude and perceptual experience toward the construct of Alzheimer ‘s. Though the respondents ‘ cognition sing the disease is undeniably limited.As a portion of the statistical analysis, the non-parametric Spearman rho analysis was besides conducted. The nonparametric Spearman ‘s rho trial was chosen because it is appropriate for the ordinal informations used in the tools. It is utile in finding relationships among nonparametric informations where the premises of the Pearson correlativity are violated. The Spearman ‘s rho trial revealed some of import, but non surprising relationships. The most important relationships, based on a 0.01 degree ( 2-tailed ) , were between the gender highest educational attainment of the respondents and their attitude and perceptual experience towards the disease. There were strong correlativities between the cognition in the patterned advance of the disease, and the cognition in the ability of AD in destructing the memory and believing accomplishments of singleThe Spearman ‘s rho, based on a 0.05 degree ( 2-tailed ) nevertheless did non uncover any important relationship or correlativity between the respondents ‘ personal information and their attitude and perceptual experience towards the Alzheimer ‘s disease.