Post-Patco Era Vs. Ups And The Teamsters? Labor Movement Essay, Research PaperRuning caput: POST-PATCO ERA VS. UPS AND THE TEAMSTERSPost-PATCO epoch vs. UPS and The Teamsters? Labor MovementTonya D. MooreUniversity of SarasotaAbstractionProfessional Air Traffic Controller Organization ( PATCO ) captivated Americansin its unsuccessful battle to win the labour motion.

The exposure during thatperiod left a diminution in any type of brotherhood battle. In 1997, United Parcel Service,Inc. ( UPS ) went on a similar motion that took a different bend for Americanlabourers. The consequences of this motion non merely contributed to success for UPSemployees, but it besides reversed the Teamsters? representation image amonglabourers. Related history of the post-PATCO epoch and the Teamsters, contribute toan consciousness of the past and present results of the joint venture between UPSand the Teamsters. Political influences, results, and statistics are related in thepresent paper. Besides, informations from the Bureau of Labor Statistics ( BLS ) are examinedas relates to brotherhood engagement in both state of affairss. Decisions sing stairss thatdirection can take to avoid work stoppages are besides offered, along with future researchrecommendations.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Post-PATCO epoch vs. UPS and The Teamsters? Labor MovementIntroductionThe present position of the labour motion caused many to lose theirassurance in attempts to protect working Americans. Whether the brotherhoodrepresentation involves the AFL-CIO, the Teamsters, national mugwumps andindependent local brotherhoods the motion is worsening.Many events alter the manner labourers? think and companies? respond. Whetherthe response entailed a work stoppage or an association to a brotherhood, the picks to labourerswere non clear. Directors and politicians took the easy path go forthing labourerskeeping the bad terminal of the stick, by coercing them back to work without a contract.

The replies are non clear and the jobs are non solved for the Americanlabourers.Fichtenbaum and Traynor ( 1997 ) noted that, the attempts of the labourmotion are steadily worsening and companies are trusting more on politicians towork out their issues. The clip has come for companies and politicians to be heldaccountable for their actions and allow labourers command their? rights. ? A recent event( UPS and the Teamsters? labour motion ) has taken topographic point to assist companies tounderstand the jobs of non following with labour motions? petitions and theloss to companies as a whole. Clearly, future diplomatic schemes need to beimplemented to forestall work stoppages, along with more concerted relationships, becausethe cost can go long-run disbursals.Literature ReviewBefore the 1980s, the mean brotherhood engagement? s totaled 1,306,300workers with an norm of 275 work stoppages ( Grimes, 1995 ) . This sum fell after thepost- Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization ( PATCO ) epoch to annorm of 407,180 workers involved and 56 work stoppages.

Grimes ( 1995 ) , utilizing aarrested development theoretical account attempted to find if the PATCO work stoppage has significantlycontributed to the worsening figure of major work stoppages, but the empirical groundsdoes non bespeak that it has had a important independent consequence. The ReaganAdministration was one factor in the displacement in labour jurisprudence, back uping employers andnon organized labour in 1981. Reagan fired the employees of PATCO for illicitlycontact and he decertified the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Association.After the largest labour mass meeting in American history, American labourers? hope waseasy disappearing. The PATCO members risked their occupations, pensions, hereafter rightsof employment with the US Government, possible terrible person and groupcivil punishments and the heavy load of condemnable countenances.

All this with the thoughtthat they would do the hereafter better for other workers.The Clinton Administration besides keyed in on issues related to workers?rights. ? For 20 old ages the rewards of working people have been dead orworsening? . For excessively many households, even when both parents were working, theAmerican dream has been stealing off. In the 1992 the American peopledemanded that we change, ? ( Clinton declared in his State of the Union reference ) . In1993, rewards declined an norm of 1.

5 per centum for hourly employees and college-educated workers. The remainder of the universe suffered excessively with impermanent occupations or merelyprogram lay offs. The consequence of the post-PATCO epoch took? hope? out of the labourmotion. Meyer ( 1994, p.116 ) stated that, ? the pick to stop in 1981 is due tothe to a great extent increased opposition to brotherhoods following the disintegration of PATCO, theincreased legal force per unit area on the Teamsters during the 1980s ( taking to theirreaffiliations with the AFL-CIO in 1987 ) , and the practical death of theindependent national brotherhood by the 1990s. ? The? hope? for labour motionsdeclined after this event.In 1907, UPS began supplying private courier and bringing services inthe Seattle, Washington country.

Now, UPS is the universe? s largest express bearer, theuniverse? s largest bundle bringing company, and a taking planetary supplier ofspecialised transit and logistics services. UPS delivers over 12 1000000sbundles and paperss for 1.7 million transportation clients per twenty-four hours throughout theUnited States and in over 200 states.

In 1998, the company reported a record of330,000 employees that delivered more than three billion bundles and paperssworldwide, bring forthing grosss of 24.8 billion and net income of 1.7 billion.

Despite these fantastic statistics, two old ages ago many employees felt that occupationsecurity was an issue with a company that consumes one million millions of dollars off of theirperspiration. Today, there are 202,000 ( 62 % ) of UPS employees that are represented byone of the most powerful brotherhoods, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters( IBT ) .Before the1997 success, the Teamsters were non the pick of the workingpeople. The repute of the Teamsters was less desirable following to the AFL-CIOdue to the higher degree of expertness and resources in the AFL-CIO and the AFL-CIO success in bettering employee? s working conditions. Cooke ( 1983 ) foundthat the Teamsters were besides less likely to win in elections than other brotherhoodsrepresentatives. Many people were reaffiliated with the AFL-CIO during the post-PATCO epoch. ? Before General President Ron Carey took office in 1992, the brotherhoodlost an norm of 40,000 members for each twelvemonth since 1979? ( The Teamster,March/April 1997 ) .Today, the Teamsters are one of the most good known brotherhood representationsfollowing to the AFL-CIO.

The Union is made up of working work forces and adult females whocomprise 1.4 million throughout the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico.Jimmy R. Hoffa, the leader of the Teamsters in 1957-1967, generated a endbefore his sudden disappearing, of taking over all transit brotherhoods. In 1964,the National Master Freight Agreement, heralded his attempts as one of the greatestachievements in U.S.

labour history. Hoffa, Sr. brought attending to theTeamsters, but he was besides the individual who set the tone for the hereafter UPSwork stoppage. Wilson and Witt ( 1999 ) noted that, in 1962 Hoffa, Sr. started the displacement forlower-wage and part-time occupations for UPS. Then, in 1982, Hoffa? s old-colleaguesagreed to stop dead the get downing parttime pay at $ 8 per hr ( The Teamster,November/December 1996 ) . Now, Jimmy P.

Hoffa, the General President of theTeamsters and the boy of the Teamster? s fable, is now undoing his male parent? s epochand go oning to followup on the issues that won the UPS work stoppage.August 4,1997 at 12:01 a.m. was the period when the Teamsters announcedthe work stoppage against UPS. This work stoppage changed the? religion? in the labour motion( Wilson and Witt, 1999 ) .

The alteration non merely affected UPS but besides it affected theassurance in the Teamsters over the AFL-CIO. The Teamsters choice in theUPS labourers? representation was an first-class pick, despite the factors that setthe tone in 1962 ( lower rewards and parttime work ) . Wilson and Witt ( 1999, p.58 )noted that, ? at a clip when the American labour motion is fighting to change by reversalits diminution in rank and strength, the Teamsters? nine-month contractrun at UPS in 1997 demonstrated that the labour can reconstruct its power byaffecting its members, making out for public support, and disputing corporatepower on behalf of all working people.

? This run non merely empowered theUPS labourers, but besides other labourers from different companies who had an involvementin these issues. The no fear syndrome was contagious, so, to labourers because themotion gave? hope? once more to Americans and what they believed to be? justness. ?Further informations will be provided here to back up the theory that the UPS andTeamsters? joint venture encouraged the labour motion to go stronger. Inanalyzing farther studies and information it will be shown that the attempt did infact do a difference and that history ( as relates to the PATCO work stoppage ) does nonever reiterate itself.

It is besides noted here, that directors and politicians need to payattending to labourers and the influences that affect them. Political influences,results, variables and statistics on the attempt will be examined in order to assistdirectors deal with future labour motions.Materials from the United Parcel Service, Inc. 1999 Prospectus was usedhere to compare fiscal studies. Information was besides obtained from TheTeamster? s magazine ( 1996 and 1997 ) . Other information was gather from the BLS ( 1999 )to set up whether the UPS motion changed the degree of brotherhood engagement.After the two hebdomad stricycle, the 185,000 members ( includes 115,000 part-timers ) won all major issues. The issues included: 20,000 full-time occupationchances for part-timers, including 10,000 new full-time occupations created frombing parttime places ; new bounds on subcontracting ; the largest-ever rewardsrises and major additions in pensions under the bing Teamster programs ; and newoccupation safety protections ( The Teamster, October 1997 ) .

At the clip of the work stoppage, House Speaker Newt Gingrich attempted to utilizetactics similar to those applied by Ronald Reagan during the PATCO labourmotion. The Teamster ( October 1997 ) reported that Gingrich and otherRepublican leaders wanted to revenge against the labour motion. Some of theonslaughts consisted of extinguishing the 40-hour work hebdomad and lease companieswork employees without overtime wage ; allowing corporations to dunk intoworkers? pension financess ; interfering in Teamster contract dialogues ; assailingmembers? rights to vote for top brotherhood officers ; and assailing Teamsters? right to beheard ( The Teamster, October 1997 ) .

At the clip, President Clinton did non allowhistory repetition itself but alternatively ignored the demands of Gingrich by allowing themotion proceed. Ron Carey, the 1997 General President of the Teamsters,stated that, ? We have to keep politicians accountable to working people, and nonmerely large corporations? ( The Teamster, October 1997 ) .The result of the motion gave other labourers the will to contend withdirection for their rights and specify the attempt as an American labour motion.Witt and Wilson ( 1999, p.

58 ) reported that, ? Twelve yearss into the two-week,nationally United Parcel Service work stoppage in August 1997, 50 workers at the RDSbundle bringing company in Cincinnati voted to fall in the Teamsters Union. ? Wittand Wilson besides note that, ? In Washington State, 4,000 corrections officers whohad an uneffective, unaffiliated association voted to go Teamsters. ? Themotion encouraged many others to either fall in the Teamsters or contend on behalfof the workers at UPS. In 1997, Ron Carey emphasized that, ? All Americanworkers owe their thanks to the 1000s of Teamsters, retired persons, and householdmembers who made our UPS triumph possible? ( The Teamster, October 1997 ) .The issues at UPS were non different from the issues of other labourers likethe PATCO members. Since the UPS work stoppage, other brotherhood associations have foughtfor similar footings. In 1998 there was the UAW 651 810-742-864-2010 work stoppageagainst GM, Delphi E for wellness, safety and subcontracts ; in 1999, the SEIU 535work stoppage against the American Red Cross for brotherhood busting ; besides in 1999, theAFSCME 31 618-462-1896 work stoppage against Beverly Farm for $ 5.

35/hr wage rate( LaborNet, 1999 ) . The above work stoppages are a little sample of other brotherhood associations.As a consequence, so, the Teamsters are non the lone brotherhood representatives doing adifference when directors and politicians continue to disregard these important homoissues.The triumph of UPS increased the consciousness of other labourers, but the consequenceon brotherhood rank was surprising. In 1998, BLS ( 1999 ) reported thatbrotherhood members in 1997 were at 14.

1 per centum and in 1998 lessening to 13.9 % . BesidesBLS ( 1999 ) reported that in 1983 brotherhood rank was at 20.1 % diminishing annorm of 6.

2 % in a 15-year period in 1983. The statistics suggests that a diminution,but the causes of the diminution are unclear at the present clip.Summary and Future Research RecommendationCompanies are frequently non cognizant of the branchings of non turn toing tolabourers? issues, alternatively they frequently choose to endure the long term reverberation, as aconsequence, in the market environment and employees? spirit.

Companies, such as UPS,hold learned that non seeking to run into employees? demands can hold negative effects onthe consequences of their operations. UPS depended to a important grade on theinability to avoid work stoppages and other work arrests by their employees. As theirrivals had grown in size and strength, UPS faced lasting loss ofclients if they were unable to supply continued service. Due to non being ableto run into client demands, their rivals became stronger and their marketportion declined during that period. Consequently, the Teamsters work stoppage resulted in alessening in the company? s fiscal and operational position. The work stoppage resulted in anet loss of $ 211 million and an operating loss of $ 349 million for the month ofAugust 1997, compared to net income of $ 113 million and an operating net income of$ 187 million for August 1996 ( Prospectus, 1999 ) . These consequences suggest thatwork outing employees? issues in a timely-manner can hold a positive consequence onemployees and clients as opposed to diminishing the spirit of employees andspliting the market with rivals.

As a director of United Parcel Service, Inc and a past UPS striker in 1997,it is thought that the undermentioned points are in order to keep effectualmanagement/employee dealingss.Qs Publicize all events to employees, including fiscal studies, makeoccupation posting available, and publicise the benefits that the company offersto their employees,Q Cross train employees ( particularly if in brotherhood guidelines ) ,q Implement studies and concentrate attending on brotherhood members? sentiments,q Work towards integrating wage/benefit position to all workers andpublicise how additions are tabulated ( harmonizing to senior status day of the month and/orother variables that may impact rewards ) ,Q DON? T Lashkar-e-Taiba information go a enigma for employees and, supply thenecessary resources to assist work out jobs,q Let employees know the BIG PICTURE sing why a company doesthings a peculiar manner and be HONEST about jobs, suggestions andissues.The above lineation may or may non assist to lend to a brotherhood freeenvironment. But, they may besides assist to avoid future work stoppages if the company isalready runing in a brotherhood scene. Unlike the PATCO state of affairs, the UPSmembers did hold an impact on the labour motion and opened the doors tohereafter attempts? all of which centered on employees? demands and consideration ofthese demands early on. With regard to future research attempts, the undermentioned pointslook to be in order? which of the above thoughts might hold the biggest impact infulfilling employee demands, and when, in peculiar, should they be delivered inorder to maximise their effects. The coveted result, of class, should be aharmonious employee/management relationship, where trust and duologue can beused to avoid such things as work stoppages and animus.

BibliographyMentionsBureau of Labor Statistics. ( 1999 ) . Union Members in 1998. Washington, DC:Writer.

Cooke, W.N. ( January 1983 ) .

Determinants of the Outcomes of CertificationElections. Industrial and Labor Relation Review, 36 402-414.Chezum, B. , ( Winter 1997 ) . Market Power and Price: Theory and Evidence onLabor Unions.

Eastern Economic Journal, 23 ( 1 ) 73-88.Fichtenbaum, R. H.

, & A ; Traynor, T. L. ( Winter 1997 ) . The impact of post-patcolabour dealingss on U.S. brotherhood rewards.

Eastern Economic Journal, 23 ( 1 ) , 61-73.Dirts, P.W.

, ( June 1995 ) . The diminution of work stoppage activity and the post-PATCO epoch.Atlantic Economic Journal, 23 ( 2 ) , 155.Hatifield, D.E. , & A ; Murrmann, K.

F. ( Fall 1999 ) . Diversification and Win Rate inNLRB Certification Elections. Journal of Labor Research, 20 ( 4 ) , 539-556.Judis, J.B. , ( 1994 ) .

Why your rewards maintain falling. New Republic, 210 ( 7 ) 26-29.LaborNet Steering Committee ( 1999 ) . LaborNet [ On-line ] . Available:www.labornet.

org.Meyer, D. ( Summer 1994 ) . The consequence of environmental economic factors onthe pick of brotherhood. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10 ( 3 ) , 113-125.Partridge, D.

M. , & A ; Townsend, A.M. ( Fall 1999 ) .

Revisiting Multi-Tier WagessStructures: Equity, Employment Mobility, and Tier Effects. Journal of LaborResearch, 20 ( 4 ) , 605-620.The Teamsters. ( 1997, October ) . Gingrich Gang Retaliates Against Labor.The Teamsters.

( 1997, October ) . Help Build on The UPS Victory.The Teamster. ( 1997, March/April ) . Part Time, Full Time, Union Time.The Teamster.

( 1997, October ) . Teamster Unity Wins UPS VICTORY.The Teamster.

( 1996, November/December ) . Teamsters Uniting to Make UPSDeliver.United Parcel Service, Inc. ( 1999, October ) . Prospectus. Atlanta, GA: Writer.

Wilson, R. , & A ; Witt M. ( Spring 1999 ) . The Teamsters? UPS Strike of 1997:Constructing a New Labor Movement. Labor Studies Journal, 24 ( 1 ) 58-73.

AppendixUnion Names and AcronymsAutomobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, United( UAW )Service Employees International Union ( SEIU )State, County and Municipal Employees, American Federation of ( AFSCME )Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Warehousemen & A ; Helpers, International Brotherhoodof ( IBT )Author NoteThe recent paper utilized the contents and the informations drawn together to organizedecisions about the post-actions of the UPS events. I am associated with UPSand the decisions and stairss that are suggested do non needfully reflect thecompanies? sentiment.I thank Geraldine Miller for her penetrations on labour brotherhoods and thepolitical events, which assisted me in forming my paper. I besides thank GeraldVaughn and Sonya McElveen for garnering the stuffs on the Teamsters.

Correspondence refering this article should be addressed to Tonya D.Moore, Department of Business Administration, University of Sarasota, 5250 17thStreet, Sarasota, Florida 34235. Electronic mail may be sent via Embanet to TonyaMoore.