Both discoursing battles in life. these two memoirs. Pursuit of Happyness and the Glass Castle showcased the manner to encompass life with perfectly no fright. They both provided ideals and showed that nil is impossible with the usage of right and appropriate attitude towards the quest for success. Both are true narratives based on life of successful persons in America. The Pursuit of felicity tackles the life of Chris Gardner. a salesman of bone scanner who turned to be a stock agent. This narrative can be considered as a modern twenty-four hours fairy narrative set in a realistic universe. This is no different compared to other success narratives.
The secret plan is fundamentally structured to demo the tendency of carpets to wealths. But what separated this narrative from others is the series of unfortunate fortunes and uninterrupted deficiency of options. At the terminal. the pick made has ever been to continue with the chosen track with bravery. On the other manus. The Glass palace discussed the narrative of awful childhood of Jeanette Walls. who subsequently became a journalist. The book shows two mutual opposition of human experience along the narrative of her household: foremost. the given life which they do non command ; and 2nd. the path of life they had chosen and fought for.
The given life pertains to Jeanette’s childhood where she experienced bad state of affairss with her household while they keep on reassigning to different locations. Frequently. these complex canonic novels are bound with the narratives with the relationships they had with the household. The battles are either quest to liberate them from poorness and accordingly raise their loved ones’ lives every bit good or the quest for dreams that they are meant to accomplish. The household as an component of the narrative will supply the touch of power or inspiration for the chief character to accomplish.
Taking a expression at these two books. seemingly. they both have this narrative component. The household of Chris Gardner is neither complex nor at easiness. It is the typical “husband- wife- one child” New York household. Economically wise. the household is financially challenged due to the instability with their income. The twosome is both working at twenty-four hours doing them make up one’s mind to direct their boy to a twenty-four hours attention centre. The jobs they are meeting sometimes leads to statements between Chris and his married woman. At one of the het statements. his married woman decided to go forth him.
This going is the touch of the narrative for either the biggest ruin of the chief character or the touch of interrupting point for his approaching success. The lone one left for Gardner is his boy. and as mentioned above. the kid served as the exclusive beginning of his inspiration. From that point. he experienced the worst parts of his life as told in the narrative. He became homeless- he carries all his and his son’s apparels along manner and confronting the fact that they are entirely and can merely trust with each other. Their agenda and budget became so tight that merely a small error will do their state of affairs drastically worse.
In one case. when they missed a coach drive. they besides missed the stay in the topographic point for homeless where they are on a regular basis remaining. While the Pursuit of Happyness has a small bracket of clip puting used in its storytelling. the Glass Castle started from the childhood of the character. It showed the image of the household. where Jeanette is involved. as non much operation. Her male parent is alcoholic and her female parent shows hapless in managing the household and dramas to be so infantile. One thing can non be denied though. These parents love their childs so much.
Jeanette. as the storyteller and the 2nd oldest kid in the household shows his solid belief with her parent’s desires non to direct them to any signifier of injury and procure them with all their demands every bit long as they could. She believes that his male parent. Rex. is worthy of regard. She ne’er lose the optimistic perceptual experience that if her male parent is non intoxicated. it will uncover his true side that he is caring for the kids and merely turned to alcohol out of desperation from embarrassment and letdown. The childs had difficult clip when they are traversing the states to happen a new topographic point to remain.
They are like nomads starting up in several different topographic points and added to that are the behaviour of their parents who are mildly psychologically ill. Their female parent. Rose Mary is an creative person at bosom and was known to be infantile at some point. There is a scene when she was caught concealing confects which make her addition weight. She went mad like a kid when her childs learned about it. What made this mad is the fact that during those yearss. her kids are in fact sing famishment and she still chose to conceal nutrient from them.
Looking at these characters. it is obvious that the functions they have for the narrative as a whole are important in determining the latter position of the chief character. The characters are component of the narrative that provides the touch of human experiences. It is of import to detect that every character in a narrative doesn’t merely function otherwise when it comes to their function but they besides vary with the manner they are presented harmonizing to the power they are lending with the secret plan and the plot line. Possibly. this is measured with the manner and with the grade of their impact on the narrative and other characters.
Emphasis on the characters can be taking for there are characters that are more open throughout the narrative but have less significance with the kernel of the narrative. Comparing these two memoirs. there can be premises that the set of characters in the Glass Castle shows strength more vivid than the set of characters in Pursuit of Happyness. The characters of Pursuit of felicity are dynamic worlds but the image of back uping characters of the Glass Castle shows a wider scope of human inclinations. It doesn’t needfully intend though that the characters of the latter are deserving being followed than the characters of the former.
Analyzing the two chief characters. Chris Gardner and Jeanette Walls. there is one common characteristic between them- optimism. They are similar to Helen Keller. who prefers to see good things but non needfully disregard those bad things. What they are making is to travel directly towards the way they have chosen despite those bad things. If we are to set that mentality into metaphor. it is about handling the obstructions and negativeness as cheerleaders that are necessary to hike their ballyhoo of desire towards success. It is common that there are psychological force per unit areas to guarantee that the family’s security is sustained and assured.
And with these two chief characters. indifference had been the key. This serves the fact that whoever you were doesn’t define who you are traveling to be alternatively whoever you were doesn’t affair in the hereafter ( Murray & A ; Fortinberry: 14-17 ) . Chris Gardner is a composed adult male who has subtle cognition about boundaries – boundaries that he has and boundaries that other people has. To turn out this. along the statement he has with his married woman. there was a neighbour who is seeking to clean a carpet and the dusts are all in the air. Bing disturbed. Chris confront that cat and state him to halt it for there are people seeking to speak.
This certain portion of the narrative shows how Chris knows what he deserves in life although this given illustration is so elusive since it merely talks about dusts and a carpet. Later. his neighbour counter argues and continued cleansing. Chris was silenced but what shows here is non defeat but the strength of the character as person who has a solid cognition about his restriction as a neighbour. as an person. Jeanette Walls. on the other manus. was singular because more than merely her intelligence. she besides has backbones to acquire out from poorness without faulting others such as her parents.
Her household supplied the function of somehow similar to a typical adversary in a novel. But this is non how it was perceived in this memoir. The parents. throughout the novel. showed the image of being irresponsible. The household is in the poorness line. These are both valid grounds for a kid to detest the state of affairss where they are involved. Surprisingly. Jeanette is non that sort of kid or to be exact. she is the complete antonym of that. Unconditional love has been a topic for romantic fictions but seldom that it was used in the context of a household. The manner it was shown is unusually skilled.
Jeanette. so. grew up as a acquisition machine that additions knowledge and used them to digest all the obstructions she is confronting in her life. Like what was mentioned. the back uping character of the Glass Castle has added an unusual texture on the narrative. This happened because the characters were introduced with diversified inclinations. Rose Mary was inclined to art and is a superb adult female. Subsequently. it was revealed that due to some issues with her hubby. she started to move infantile. This displacement with the female parent will merely lend to the failure of their household.
One important cardinal point in both narratives is the construct of paternity. Fatherhood is a common topic for art pieces non merely for literature. Patriarchy is a societal phenomenon that needs to be handled with adequate attention for this is more than merely an issue of individualism or maleness but more on its societal context. There are two dimension of paternity: First. the function as a male parent to kids and second. the function as the hubby. Contract theories had been applied in the field of societal scientific disciplines to analyse each function farther. Furthermore. it has its political and societal considerations largely.
In relation to paternal political relations. in mention to the plants of Robert Goodin and Philipp Pettit. in the separate narrative of Gardner and Walls. the dimension that was largely tackled is the paternal function of paternity. The chief difference is the way of the issue in relation to the societal environment. There are no issues between Chris and his boy. The issues in the narrative are merely directed on them from the outside societal environment. Poverty is one state of affairs which is characterized by being homeless. idle and frequent famishment. This fatherhood illustration is a show window of paternal state of affairs that was determined by the outside factors.
The way of the issue is different in the instance of Walls. Jeanette has issue with her male parent. whether she is apathetic of it or non. What remained clear is that the kineticss of the function of her male parent was ruined by depressions. It accordingly ruined the societal environment which is the household. This issue was even amplified when the male parent turned into intoxicant as a defence mechanism for all their bad lucks. This patriarchal political relations had been one of the cardinal thoughts of both memoirs and is important in understanding the idea of them.
Chris Gardner is a hero for his boy. Christopher. This is a strong index of his paternal mutual opposition. The path that Chris took is entirely devoted for them. This shows that whatever is traveling to go on to anyone of them. the consequence will be on both of them. This tie between the two is finely shown in the book without any use of mawkishness and without utilizing excessively much romanticism. In the instance of Jeanette Walls. the thought of paternal hero is besides important. Her wish to hold a hero male parent is non repressed. For her. it is the world that she is seeing.
His male parent is more than merely a rummy but a loving person to her and the remainder of her household. In this perceptual experience. seemingly. the thought of hero male parent is more realistic in the narrative of Pursuit of Happyness. There remained an interesting thought that what Walls is gestating or perceiving is a better or even absolute symbol of a more perfect paternity. Both narratives are carefully written which secured the hook it can do to those who are after self-improvement. After all. these are merely memoirs which are supposed to supply the narratives that are personally addressed.
But in the history of this signifier of literature. we can’t disregard the fact that people are meant to be inspired by them and accordingly change their egos. Works Cited Gardner. Chris and Troupe Quincy. the Pursuit of Happyness. Myocardial infarction: Amistad. ( 2006 ) . Walls. Jeanette. The Glass Castle: A Memoir. New york: Scribner ( 2005 ) Murray. Bob and Fortinberry. Alicia. Making optimism. USA: Mc Graw Hill ( 2004 ) Goodin. Robert and Petit. Philip. Contemporary political doctrine. Ma: Wiley Blackwell ( 1997 ) University of Oklahoma. World Literature Today. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press. ( 1999 )