Secession Of South Carolina- Essay, Research PaperSecession of South Carolina-Following the election of Abraham Linclon as President of theUnited States in 1860, South Carolina was the first of 7 provinces tosecede from the brotherhood.
They claimed, as their grounds for sezession,frequent misdemeanors of the Constitution by the federal authorities andinvasions upon the reserved rights of the Senate. But did SouthCarolina have the right, lawfully or morally, to splinter from the Unionand set up its ain Confederacy? After all, didn & # 8217 ; t they fight sohard to go a free and independent state from Great Britain inthe American Revolution lupus erythematosus so a century ago? And now they aresplintering from their ain state that they fought for, and are doinga war in an effort to set up their ain state? Legally, SouthCarolina had the right, but non morally.Following the American Revolution, all ( at that clip ) 13provinces signed a Declaration of Independence saying & # 8220 ; that they areand of right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES ; and that, asfree and independent provinces they have full power to impose war,conclude peace, contract confederations, set up commercialism and to make allother Acts of the Apostless and things which independent provinces may of right do.
& # 8221 ; In1783, a pact was signed with Great Britain that acknowledged themas & # 8220 ; FREE SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATES holding the right to regulateitself, and the right of the people to get rid of a authorities when itbecomes destructive of the terminals for which it was instituted. & # 8221 ; Then in1787 the Articles of Confederation was revised going theFundamental law of the United States. This added to the Articles ofConfederation that & # 8220 ; exercisings were restrained necessary for theirbeing of autonomous provinces amendment added-declared that powersnon delegated to the US by the fundamental law or prohibited by thatStates were reserved for the States. & # 8221 ; This is clear cogent evidence that South
There are, nevertheless, some moral issues involved in SouthCarolinas sezession from the brotherhood. For case, they had all foughttogether for their independency from Great Britain less so acentury ago in the American Revolution. This gave all the provinces abond between each other.
They had come together to contend for theirrights as a state. Now they are traveling to revolt to be separated fromtheir ain state? This doesn & # 8217 ; t seem like a really moral thing to make.It & # 8217 ; s sort of like a female parent contending for detention of her kidfollowing a divorce from her hubby. Then, after all the problem ofthe test, she disowns her kid because she didn & # 8217 ; t agree on somethings that he did. It & # 8217 ; s merely non right, you don & # 8217 ; t battle forsomething, and so turn against it. Another thing is that when SouthCarolina signed the Declaration of Independence, the preamble statedthat it was created & # 8220 ; to organize a more perfect brotherhood, set up domesticrepose, supply for the common defence, promote general public assistanceand procure the approval of autonomy to ourselves and our posterity.
& # 8221 ;Notice the portion: organize a more perfect brotherhood. South Carolina secedingfrom the brotherhood does non assist in making this but prevents it.In decision, South Carolina had every legal right tosecede from the Union following Lincoln & # 8217 ; s election in 1860. They hadsigned 3 paperss prior to that set uping them as free andindependent provinces.
They did non, nevertheless, have any moral right to makeso. One of there ends as a province in the United States was to organize amore perfect brotherhood. Seceding and doing a civil war between astate that fought for its independency, as a state is non a goodillustration of how to organize a perfect brotherhood.