Sleepy Hollow: Movie Compared To The Book Essay, Research Paper
& # 8220 ; The Legend of Sleepy Hollow & # 8221 ; is a short narrative by Washington Irving. Based on a well-known fable, this narrative tells the narrative of the disappearing of the chief character, Ichabod Crane. An effectual shade narrative, Irving foliages you thinking what the truth is behind the stoping. The film Sleepy Hollow is Hollywood & # 8217 ; s portraiture of Irving & # 8217 ; s original narrative. Although the film is similar to the narrative in the beginning, the film takes a turn that leads in another way that strays far from the original secret plan.
The original narrative by Washington Irving starts out in a little town of Sleepy Hollow. Irving paints an image of big harvests, beautiful scenery, and comfortable landholders. Ichabod Crane was a local educator, who taught at the local schoolhouse. He was known for his rigorous ways and yet he was really popular amongst the households of his students- particularly the 1s who had & # 8220 ; pretty sisters. & # 8221 ; Ichabod enjoyed passing autumn eventides with the old widows as they sat by a fire and told narratives of shades and devils and other supernatural existences. One narrative that was ever told was one of the legendary Headless Horsemen. The tale Tells of a soldier who had his caput shot off with a cannon ball. His shade now roamed Sleepy Hollow on his Equus caballus, looking for his lost caput. In topographic point of his caput, sits a jack-o-lantern, which had a ardent freshness.
Intertwined with this short narrative is a love narrative, or instead a narrative of pure lecherousness and greed. Ichabod Crane was in & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; with a miss named Katrina Van Tassel. Katrina was the girl of the wealthy and comfortable landholder, Heer Van Tassel. Ichabod & # 8217 ; s chase of Katrina was for strictly physical and lubricious grounds. His desires to be affluent and ain the Van Tassel estate along with Katrina & # 8217 ; s beauty drove him to prosecute her. Unfortunately, standing in Ichabod & # 8217 ; s manner was the fine-looking Brom Van Brunt, otherwise known as Brom Bones. Brom was a troublesome immature adult male who was known for his buffooneries and troublemaking while siting his Equus caballus DareDevil. Brom was in love with Katrina every bit good and was badly covetous of Ichabod & # 8217 ; s efforts to get married her.
One dark and lonely dark, after a dance at the Van Tassel estate, Ichabod attempted to go place. On his old Equus caballus, Gunpowder, he easy made his manner through the dark forests that crossed his way. Unfortunately, looking from the dark shadows came a headless figure, which frightened Ichabod. In an effort to get away, he ran to the covered span where the equestrian was supposed to vanish into a explosion of fire. Unfortunately, the figure flung its pumpkin caput at Ichabod, strike harding him off his Equus caballus and strike harding him unconscious province that the following twenty-four hours, all that remained was a besotted Cucurbita pepo. Ichabod had disappeared. The narrative leaves you thinking what truly happened. Did Ichabod run off, or did the Haunted Horseman kill him? Or was it Brom Bones, who married Katrina shortly after his opposition & # 8217 ; s disappearing, and laughed every clip there was reference of the Cucurbita pepo.
The manager Tim Burton created his ain vision on The Legend of Sleepy Hollow. Sleepy Hallow was a film about a investigator named Ichabod Crane who has his ain vision on how offenses can be solved. He is sent to a little, drab town called Sleepy Hollow, to work out the slaying of three town & # 8217 ; s people. Once Ichabod arrives in town, he meets Katrina, whom he falls in love with, which is non to the liking of Brom, the covetous boyfriend of Katrina. The beginning of the narrative is about precisely like the original narrative, except that Ichabod is now a investigator, and he & # 8217 ; s seeking to work out a slaying enigma of three dead people who have all had their caputs cut off, although the caputs are no where to be found. Although Burton did include Irving & # 8217 ; s original narrative in his narrative, he gave his version of what happened, in which instance, Brom does feign to be the disguised equestrian, yet that is merely the beginning. With a sudden turn, Burton introduced charming and witchery into
his narrative. The truth behind the equestrian is an existent devil that was behind the violent deaths, yet is controlled by a enchantress. The lecherousness and greed of the original secret plan no longer are on Ichabod’s head, but now belong to the true enchantress, Katrina’s stepmother who has her ain grounds for seeking retaliation on the town of Sleepy Hollow. The movie’s secret plan took a way of its ain and answered the inquiry of whether or non the headless equestrian was existent or non. In so stop, the enchantress is killed for the intent of leting Ichabod to win the miss, every bit good as brand Ichabod the hero of the narrative. Finally, Ichabod solves the instance, the Headless horseman’s caput is returned to him and he returns to hell, taking the enchantress along with him and good overcomes evil, a true Hollywood turn.
Both narratives tell the narrative of a individual whose lecherousness and greed lead to their devastation. In the original narrative, Ichabod & # 8217 ; s desire for the Van Tassel estate led him to trail after a miss, and anger the local bully. His greed drove him to his devastation. Whatever his destiny, he no longer returned to Sleepy Hollow and he lost the miss and land he wanted. Ichabod Crane was portrayed as a avaricious self-involved adult male who would make anything to acquire what he wanted. The film portrayed Ichabod as a nice adult male whose lone end was to make his occupation right and to stand up for people & # 8217 ; s rights. Katrina & # 8217 ; s stepmother becomes the symbol of green-eyed monster and its reverberations. Her desire to command land and money leads her on the way of the supernatural in order to capture all that she desires. Although the movie keeps you in suspense with gruesome inside informations and heartfelt play, Burton depicts his version of the narrative by replying the inquiry of: what happened to Ichabod? Burton expanded on the theory of the possibility of a shade, a devil of the supernatural universe who was controlled by Katrina & # 8217 ; s stepmother. The Headless Horseman was her tool to take retaliation on the Van Tassel household. Not merely has she taken retaliation on the household, but besides anyone who would be given control of the heritage. Burton uses this narrative line to add in the subject in the subject of greed yet to take it off from the chief character, Ichabod, in order to do him the hero of the narrative.
Between the two narratives, I found Washington Irving & # 8217 ; s version to be more appealing. With his pick of the stoping, Irving used suspense in constructing the imaginativeness. When speaking about the Horseman, he used dark descriptions, which helped make an eerie temper, while speaking about Katrina and the town he used bright images to assist construct a mental image of the scenery. Irving & # 8217 ; s motivation was to allow you utilize your imaginativeness. Although he described the scene for you, you use your imaginativeness to make full in the missing pieces. When it came to stoping the narrative, Irving foliages you in suspense. In actuality, the film has a wholly different secret plan line from the original narrative, although both narratives provide a helpless chief character, which is genuinely incapable of fending for him. Yet the chief subject with Ichabod was that in both, he was a instructor. Although in the film he was a investigator, he was a scientist who was willing to learn people his methods of work outing offenses. While the original narrative leaves you inquiring what happens to Ichabod, the film leaves you with the inquiry on whether or non everything can be explained by scientific discipline. Ichabod tries the full film to seek and calculate out who is the liquidator by utilizing all his scientific accounts, yet in the terminal, there genuinely was a shade. Both narratives leave you believing about the possibility of shades and devils.
When it comes to both narratives, they both provide inquiries that leave us to chew over. While they have their similarities, the bulk of thoughts differ. The narrative lines differ in so many ways that they are two different narratives with a few similarities that tie them together. Although I enjoyed watching the film, I still find that I prefer the inquiry that the original narrative left us inquiring. What did go on to Ichabod Crane? Personally? I think he ran off.