Last updated: April 25, 2019
Topic: ScienceBiology
Sample donated:

Symbiotic Relationships in Nature

The word mutualism can be broken down into syn, intending with, and biosis, intending life. From those significances, the definition of a symbiotic relationship can be inferred. It is an confidant and sometimes long-run interaction between two different biological species. Symbiotic relationships can be broken down into three classs of relationships. The three classs are symbiosis, commensalism, and parasitism. The three classs of mutualism can be looked at as effects. Mutualism has a positive-positive consequence. This means that each spouse in the relationship is reciprocally benefitted. Commensalism has a positive-neutral consequence. This means that the commensal, or they spouse that benefitted, benefits and the host is non affected in any manner. Parasitism has a positive-negative consequence. This means that one spouse benefits and the other spouse is harmed. This paper will look at symbiosis, commensalism, and parasitism and illustrations of the relationships that can be found in nature.

Symbiosis is when both of the species, or spouses, benefit from their interactions. An illustration of a mutualistic relationship is the 1 between workss and mycorrhizal Fungi. The mycorrhizal fungi signifier these relationships with the workss after come ining their roots. There are some workss that depend on the Fungi to last. When mycorrhizal fungi enter the roots of the works they begin to do hyphae. Hyphae are little, branch-like constructions. They increase the country of soaking up so the works can take in more H2O and foods. Mycorrhizal Fungi can besides direct out compounds that help to break up organic affair that they so absorb. Since this is a mutualistic relationship the mycorrhizal Fungi besides benefit. The fungi give the workss foods and H2O and the workss allow the Fungis get their nutrient, which is sugar, straight from the works cells ( Wallace, 2004 ) .

Another illustration of symbiosis would be the relationship between the clown fish and the sea windflower. A sea windflower comes in many colourss and it attracts many fish. When the fish semen towards the “flower” the sea windflower stings the fish with its tentacles and eats the fish. The clown fish, nevertheless, is able to construct up unsusceptibility to the sting of the sea windflower. Because the sting does n’t impact the clown fish, it hides in the sea windflower. The sea windflower allows the clown fish to conceal in it because the clown fish attracts larger fish, which the sea windflower will kill and eat ( Silverstein, 1998 ) . Another benefit of allowing the clown fish fell in the sea windflower ‘s tentacles is fresh O. The sea windflower is stationary and the O becomes stale and that make the sea windflower sick. While the clown fish is concealing, it moves its fives and that stirs the O giving the sea windflower fresh O ( Silverstein, 1998 ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The sea windflower does n’t merely hold a partnership with the clown fish ; it besides has one with the anchorite crab. When the anchorite crab wants to strike up a partnership, it picks up the sea windflower and begins to transport it on its dorsum. The sea windflower hides the anchorite crab from marauders and stings the marauders that get excessively near. The anchorite crab will catch nutrient and portion some of it with the sea windflower. The motion besides allows the sea windflower to catch more nutrient that it would if it were stationary ( Silverstein, 1998 ) .

Commensalism is when one spouse benefits while the other spouse is neither harmed nor benefitted. An illustration of commensalism is the relationship between manta beams and suckerfishs ( Corral Reef Connections ) . Manta beams are some of the largest fishes. They eat little quarries such as fish and crustaceans. Sometimes, some of the manta beam ‘s nutrient will avoid be eaten by the beam merely to be eaten by the suckerfish. The suckerfish is a fast swimming fish that has a suction phonograph record which allows them to attach themselves to hosts like the manta beam ( CRC ) . When the manta beam begins to eat, the suckerfish will travel behind a choice up whatever scraps the beam leaves behind ( CRC ) . Because the remora benefits and the manta beam is neither harmed nor benefitted their relationship is a signifier of commensalism.

The relationship between cowss egrets and farm animal is another illustration of commensalism. When farm animal such as cattles or Equus caballuss move, they rouse insects that were antecedently hidden in the grass. When these insects are winging out of the grass the cowss egret eats them. In this relationship the cowss egrets benefit by eating the insects that the farm animal stir up, while the farm animal do non profit, nor are they harmed.

Parasitism is when one spouse benefits at the disbursal of the other spouse during their interactions. It is complex and has been seen in all animate beings and workss that are known ( Calow, 1998 ) . Examples of parasites are mistletoe workss. All mistletoes, no affair what species, are parasites. They are “aerial parasites of braid ( Glatzel, 2008 ) .” They attach to a host subdivision, must get the better of the host works ‘s defences, and derive entree to the foods and H2O they need to be successful. The chief resource the mistletoe competes for is H2O. It has to vie with all the other subdivisions and foliages for the H2O. Some people wonder why the mistletoe and the tree ‘s relationship is non considered as mutualistic, or why the mistletoe is non considered as another subdivision. The ground that neither of these is possible is because the mistletoes do non “contribute significantly to the photosynthetic addition of the host tree ( Glatzel, 2008 ) .” Since the mistletoes do non lend to the host tree, but they still take H2O and foods from the host tree, they are considered parasites because they are profiting at the disbursal of the host tree.

Another signifier of parasitism can be found in roundworms and workss. While there are many different species of roundworms, the mechanisms of how the parasitize the workss are fundamentally the same. The roundworms all have a stylet and are obligate, which means they must feed on a works one time in order to finish their life rhythm ( Nematode Parasite Page ) . They obtain foods from populating cells of foliages, stems, or roots. Plant parasitic roundworms can be placed into two classs: entoparasites and ectozoans. Endoparasites feed on the works from the interior and ectozoans feed on the works from the exterior ( NPP ) .

Nematodes are besides parasites of animate beings. There are many different species and their eating wonts are diverse. What they eat, nevertheless, is non diverse. They will devour blood, digestive, lymph, mucous membrane, secernments and hepatic tissues. An illustration of a parasitic roundworm in an animate being is the hookworm in worlds ( NPP ) . When the hookworm gets into the homo they go directly to the bowels. From there it hooks its latch into the host and begins to suck the host ‘s blood. When there is merely a little sum of hookworms in the homo, the infection is considered to be light and will hold no symptoms ( NPP ) . The symptoms from a heavy infection can be really serious. The symptoms can include anemia, loss of appetency, weight loss, diarrhoea, and abdominal hurting. There are besides side effects for these symptoms. They can include fatigue, hard external respiration, expansion of the bosom, and an irregular pulse ( NPP ) .

As can be seen from all of the illustrations, symbiotic relationships can be found in practically every niche of the universe. They can besides be seen in all groups of life on the planet. Each of these relationships contributes to the apprehension of each their several ecosystem.


Calow, P. ( 1998 ) . The Encyclopedia of ecology and environmental direction. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //

Development: Survival: Coral Reef Connections. ( n.d. ) . PBS. Retrieved March 13, 2010, from hypertext transfer protocol: //

Gaugler, R. , & A ; Bilgrami, A.L. ( 2004 ) . Nematode behaviour. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //

Glatzel, G. , & A ; Geils, B. ( 2009 ) . Mistletoe ecophysiology: host-parasite interactions. Botany ( 19162790 ) , 87 ( 1 ) , 10-15. doi:10.1139/B08-096.

Nematode Parasite Page. ( n.d. ) . SU classes web waiter. Retrieved March 13, 2010, from hypertext transfer protocol: //

Silverstein, A. , Silverstein, V. , & A ; Nunn, L. ( 1998 ) . Pickings COVER. ( p. 22 ) . Lerner Printing Group. Retrieved from Environment Complete database.

Wallace, J. ( 2004 ) . The Fungus Among Us. Alternatives Journal, 30 ( 5 ) , 32-34. Retrieved from Environment Complete database.