The Constitution Essay, Research PaperThe Fundamental lawRight from the beginning of it? s creative activity the fundamental lawof the United States has been a rickety papers. The really footingfor it being there was in fact illegal. The narrative of Americanpolitical relations starts with the Declaration of Independence.

Thispapers was brightly written by Thomas Jefferson andcompacted all of the great thoughts of enlightenment into one shorteasy to read paper. The declaration stated all of the ideals thenew American state would endeavor for. A fundamental law was neededas a manner in which to carry through those ends. The articles ofConfederacy were created as that fundamental law. However, they wereweak, because no province wanted to give away any of their powers,and so the articles finally failed. That is when the moderntwenty-four hours fundamental law was get downing to organize. The Articles ofConfederate states stated that in order to alter any portion of thepapers all 13 provinces must hold to the alteration. Therefora meeting was called so that they could amend the weaknessarticles.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

However, representatives from two of the provinces didnon demo up. Even though non all provinces were represented themeeting started and the first ballot was to wholly throw away theArticles of Confederacy. The fundamental law wasn? T formed yet andit was already a blemished papers. Because non all provinces wererepresented when the articles required it, the fundamental law wasan illegal papers. The delegates working on the fundamental lawnew that they needed a stronger papers, because the articlesproved excessively weak, but it still needed to delight all of the provinces.

This was impossible. So what ended up occurrence was the newducocument became more and more vague. The lone manner to make apapers that would go through was to do a papers which didn? Ttruly work out any jobs but do each province believe that therejobs would be fixed.

This was accomplished by doing it sothat it was excessively obscure to pique anybody but you could read intoit. This made for a papers that would be earnestly flawedbecause people would be able to read into it excessively much. It couldnon work. The Fundamental law of the United States of America wasexcessively obscure to work.

The manner the fundamental law was written it gave power to fourparts: the Congress, the executive subdivision, the judicial subdivision,and the provinces. Because it was so obscure it did non truly specifywhich powers went where ( with a few exclusions ) . It left excessivelymuch room to read into and take power off from other subdivisionsand into your subdivision to give yourself more power. Thefundamental law leaves all unmentioned powers to the provinces,stand foring the people. This seems like that would be allot ofpower, and it would be, except that the other three subdivisionswould read into there powers and finally take about allpowers so that the staying powers were small andunconsiquencial. Throughout the history of the fundamental law thethree subdivisions of the authorities would clip and clip once more spread outtheir powers.

Each clip taking more powers off from the provincesand unbalance the system so that the original ideals set would bedestroyed.Congress was split into two houses: the senate and thehouse of representatives. This was one of the ways which thefundamental law gave an unreal power to the people. The house isthe lone portion of the authorities which is straight elected by thepeople. This made the people think they were acquiring a directstate in the authorities, but that wasn? T true because everythingdone in the house would hold to travel through the senate which wasrun by the elite. throughout the old ages Congress has invariablyexpanded their powers through a wide reading of thefundamental law and with every illustration they have abused the systemby unbalancing powers and taking rights off from the people.

The biggest thing they used to spread out their powers was alittle subdivision of the fundamental law which they expanded to givethem any power the saw proper of themselves to hold. Article 1subdivision 8 clause 18 is called the elastic clause. This clauseprovinces that Congress can do any Torahs necessary and proper totransport out their powers. This is one of the large grounds thefundamental law can non work. this clause is merely excessively obscure tolet any apprehension of what Congress? s powers are. Congresswould take this clause to the extreme.

It does state the can merelydo Torahs which would complement their listed powers. However,they took it to intend they could make anything necessary to transportout their? occupation, ? which of coarse is anything in their involvement,or? in the involvement of America. ?The first major illustration of their abusement of this clause isthe Bank of the United States. In no topographic point does the fundamental lawstate that the federal authorities has any right, or power, to putup a concern. Therefor that power would be left for the provinces.This did non go on, nevertheless.

Congress, ? in their spacewisdom? , deemed it necessary and proper to make a bank tostabilise the economic system. Right from the get downing powers werebeing stripped from the provinces. It seems the authorities made forthe people was now working against them because the fundamental lawwas excessively obscure to protect them.In another case Congress used the necessary and properclause to go through the Alien and Sedition Act. These Torahs forbadepeople to talk out against the authorities. Doesn? t the firstamendment protect peoples right to liberate address? But sinceCongress thought it was necessary and proper to hold a jurisprudence likethis they were allowed to because that? s the manner they interpretedthe fundamental law. Yet another right of the people taken awaybecause the fundamental law was excessively obscure.

Even though the fundamental laws was supposed to assist theauthorities achieve the ideals set by the new state it turned outto be one of the greatest jobs the state faced, and it wasresponsible for one of the worst wars in American history, thecivil war. This job foremost started with the nullificationcrisis. Because the fundamental law was so obscure that jobserupted over where the powers were to travel, the three subdivisions ofthe federal authorities began to derive as many powers as theyperchance could. This goes against the whole thought of Americanideals. The provinces were the 1s who were acquiring their rightstaken from them through wide reading of the fundamental law,when the fundamental law was supposed to protect them. this casedthe provinces to state that they had the right to declare somethingthe authorities had done unconstitutional.

It was in fact theirright because it was a power non mentioned in the fundamental lawand therefor left for the provinces. It was foremost brought up in thesignifier of the Virginia and Kentucky declarations which were inprotest to the foreigner and sedition act. they were denied theP >right so. It so came up once more in the Hayne, Webster argumentin respects to a duty imposed which favored the northern provinces,and their right was denied so excessively. The federal authorities hadwon out and from so on the federal authorities would take morepowers so of all time intended. The fundamental law had failed.

It hadallow things run rampantly. It decidedly did non carry through it? s occupation toattempt to maintain the powers balanced and protect the peoples rights.The wideness of the fundamental law created jobs withinthe executive subdivision excessively. In some instances the fundamental law wasblatantly disregarded.

Right from the Washington? s foremostpresidential term there was statement about how the fundamental law would beinterpreted. During his presidential term two people in his cabinetwould alter how the fundamental law would work for the remainder of it? slife. Those two people were Alexander Hamilton and ThomasJefferson. Alexander Hamilton realized that the fundamental law waswritten excessively mistily to be taken earnestly.

His point of view wasthat the authorities could read into it because that was the lonemanner things could acquire done. Jefferson realized that this woulddeprive the people of their rights and in that manner destroy theideals of America. He believed the fundamental law should be readpurely. The lone job with this was that it did nonspecifically say anything. It was a catch 20 two, and thatis the whole ground the fundamental law is a failure. No affair howit is interpreted it can non carry through anything towards theends of America. Thomas Jefferson? s manner seemed to be thefairest to the people and he finally became the president.

However, this proved the fundamental law can non work for thepeople. This is because when he became president he was all forrigorous reading which would protect the peoples rights.However, he realized he had no power to acquire things done.

When hewanted to buy land he found out there was no manner theauthorities could which is a immense defect because it would greatlyaid America if it could. He ended up purchasing the land utilizing awide reading of the fundamental law and traveling against hisain values. He realized the fundamental law was excessively obscure to work.This International Relations and Security Network? t the lone clip the executive subdivision has abused thefundamental law.

When Andrew Jackson was president he whollydisregarded it turn outing it had no existent power to maintain the subdivisionsin cheque. The first job that came up was because of theNative Americans. The Cherokee were being forced to travel butthey thought they did non hold to under the Torahs of the unitedprovinces, so they took it to tribunal. They finally won and weregranted the right to maintain their lands. However President Jacksonhad other programs. He forced the Cherokee to travel against thetribunal opinion. The fundamental law gave no power to forestall againstthis.

Yet another job with the vagueness of thefundamental law. Another job arose during his presidential term.Jackson did non like the bank of the united provinces because itbrought the rich elite closer to the power. The purposes ofthis were good but he destroyed the bank which had already beenproved constitutional.

This incident brought up the inquiry ofwho has the right to state something is unconstitutional, becausein one of the fundamental laws many defects it does non advert thismost of import power so everybody was claiming to posses it.The Judicial Branch was in no manner excluded from this racefor power. Although it had no existent power to straight tamper inthe other subdivisions it used tribunal instances to put case in points for howthings would be conducted in the hereafter and therefor pull powerto themselves.The first and most of import instance they used to acquire power wasMarbury v. Madison. In this historical instance Judicial reappraisal wasformed which gave the tribunal the power to declare an act ofcongress unconstitutional. Marbury was one of the midnight Judgessappointed by John Adams as he was go forthing office.

Adams wasseeking to pack the tribunals with people from his political partybecause they would function for life. Marbury ne’er got his paresand when the following president found it he refused to present it.Marbury sued for his occupation and it went to the supreme tribunal.

Thejudiciary act would hold forced the new president to present thedocuments. The tribunals agreed. John Marshall, the main justness,said that Marbury had every right to his occupation, but that Congresshad created powers non stated in the fundamental law. Because ofthis, Marbury did non acquire his occupation. Marshal so went on to putup Judicial reappraisal. By making this, nevertheless, the tribunal didsomething they themselves had merely said was unconstitutional.The fundamental law was supposed to be able to work out these jobsbut it was excessively obscure.Another tribunal instance, McCulloch v.

Maryland, gave even morepower to congress straight taking it off from the provinces. Inthis instance the domination clause was protected and allow Congress utilizea wide reading of it to take power. When the 2nd bankof the united provinces was formed Maryland instituted a revenue enhancement to seekand forbid the bank from being profitable. They said they hadthe right to command at that place local concern but the federalauthorities argued the domination clause protected them. TheSupreme Court decided that the domination clause protected thingsset by the authorities from the provinces. The American Peoples werelosing power by springs and bounds.

This instance made the federalauthorities supreme over the provinces. The fundamental law had failedto give the provinces any power to look into the federal authorities.The chief ideal set by the new state was to maintain as much power aspossible with the provinces, and now the provinces had no power.Time and clip once more in each subdivision of the authorities thefundamental law was read into and powers were created, turn outing thefundamental law was excessively obscure to work.

Congress used a twosome ofunfastened ended clauses to make any power they wanted forthemselves. The executive subdivision proved it was excessively obscure to beable to give any existent power, and to that terminal could non maintain thesubdivisions in cheque. And, the tribunals used their instance determination torob people of their rights. The Fundamental law was made in a mannerwhere it was doomed to neglect. It did non truly state anything sothere was edge to be jobs, and it has proved true clip andclip once more.Hall, Kermit L. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of theUnited States.

New York Oxford University Press, 1992.Witt, Elder. The Supreme Court A to Z. Congressional QuarterlyInc. Washington DC, 1993.Bacon, Donald C. The Encyclopedia of the United States Congress.Simon & A ; Schusks.

New York, 1995.Gilbert, Steve. Landmark Decisions of the United States SupremeCourt IV. Excellent Books. California, 1994.Danzer, Gerald A. The Americans.

McDougal Littell. EvanstonIL, 1998.