“The Things They Carried” .

by Tim O’Brien includes an mixture of fictional war narratives. supplying a moral penetration into the Vietnam War for those that were privileged plenty to get away its appreciation or lose it wholly. What is peculiarly intriguing about O’Brien’s novel is his incorporation of context sing the different gender functions existent within American society during this disruptive period of history. These stereotypes are displayed in expressed item within the chapter entitled. ‘On The Rainy River’ of the novel.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

in which O’Brien deliberates the exact consequence that these gender constructs had on the immature work forces that were told that they had to travel to war.America was in Vietnam for fright of the Domino Theory and communist enlargement throughout South-East Asia. nevertheless the single work forces that were made to function. fought for really different grounds so. Whether or non the immature work forces were enthusiastic or opposed to the construct of functioning in the Vietnam run. within. ‘On the Rainy River’ of “The Things They Carried” . O’Brien suggests.

through his ain experiences. that the make up one’s minding factor in the determination to contend was in fact measured by the gender perceptual experience of males within the confines of society. This can be observed in mention to his moral conflictions when foremost presented with the bill of exchange presentment in the summer of 68. stating.

“Certain blood was being shed for unsure grounds. The lone certainty that summer was moral confusion. ”O’Brien applies the word. ‘certain’ repeatedly within this illustration. exemplifying to us. the reader. the grade of confusion he faced with the reaching of the bill of exchange card.

This confusion evolved for the ground that. in O’Brien’s instance. there set uncertainness in his sentiment of whether the war in Vietnam was being fought for legitimate grounds. Although he was neither a painstaking dissenter nor pacificist by jurisprudence.

in this. O’Brien suggests that he was unable to place with the Vietnam War in any manner or signifier. To him. the war in simplest footings seemed incorrect. Despite this. he.

along with the immature work forces around him. were prepared to put their lives in the custodies of the American Government to make with them as they wished. In order for us to understand precisely how a degree headed adult male of O’Brien’s position could offer what was basically a forfeit of kinds. one must foremost analyze the place a adult male was expected to keep within American society during the sixtiess.As a regulation. stereotypes by and large dictate how.

by whom and when it is socially acceptable to expose an emotion. Reacting in a stereotyped mode may ensue in societal blessing. while responding in a mode that subverts a stereotype could ensue in disapproval within the parametric quantities of what society deems acceptable. Of class. for Tim O’Brien. when foremost presented with the bill of exchange notice in June of 1968.

aside from ideas of decease and the grounds for America’s engagement in the war. his head rapidly focused on the deductions involved with perchance running off from his committednesss. Escaping. so to talk. This can be observed within O’Brien’s thought procedure.“Run.

I’d think. Then I’d think. Impossible. Then a 2nd subsequently I’d believe.

Run” .O’Brien has deliberately applied short. compendious sentence construction in order to non merely stress the sheer significance of holding such ideas within the range of the stereotyped society that he lives. but besides to picture the existent procedure in which such ideas occurred to him. The subsequent consequence of this sentence construction provides an penetration for the reader.

leting him/ her to sympathize with O’Brien and understand the conflictions involved in his decision-making after having the bill of exchange presentment. Additionally. the sentence is entrapped by the word ‘run’ . which in bend illustrates the imprisonment of his ideas. The ideas between these two words are undistinguished as the word ‘run’ captivates the sentence and therefore. his ideas. In footings of punctuation.

the writer has besides introduced a capital missive after each comma. sing the words ‘Impossible’ and ‘Run’ . Sub-consciously in the reader’s mind these peculiar words are identified in a manner that allows them to stand independently. so when studied separately the sentence reads. “Run.

Impossible. Run” . with italics added to the concluding ‘Run’ for accent.

therefore showing the teasing visual aspect of the construct in O’Brien’s head. Unfortunately for O’ Brien. and all work forces that received the bill of exchange notice for that portion.

running off from the Vietnam War carried with it really important deductions so as it was considered a condemnable discourtesy.Now. besides the legal complications. there were besides the societal effects to be considered. Within the journal entry entitled. “Men in America: Two Surveies in Gender History” . Michael C. C.

Adams argues that.“The definition of American manhood is progressively at odds with the outlooks of American male parents. ”What this basically means is that the gender roles existent within American society are but a merchandise formulated by the old coevals of work forces. Interestingly.

O’Brien acknowledges the premiss of C. C. Adam’s statement within. “On the Rainy River” .

saying. “My hometown was a conservative small topographic point on the prairie. a topographic point where tradition counted.

It was easy to conceive of people sitting around a table down at the old Gobbler Cafe on Main Street. the conversation easy zeroing in on the immature O’Brien child. how the blasted pantywaist had taken off for Canada. ”Within this observation of his fellow townspeople. O’Brien makes mention to the importance of ‘traditions’ within his little state town. However. he is non admiting the importance of the traditions so much as he is accepting the place that gender stereotypes hold within the town.

O’Brien inserts conversationally blunt linguistic communication within the paragraph. evident in the phrase. “the damned sissy” . This enunciation by and large presents an image of conservative. hardworking and ‘patriotic’ Americans.

or in Tim O’Brien’s instance. people that had lived through the Second World War. The consequence of this linguistic communication technique is that it illustrates the outlooks that O’Brien holds in his perceptual experience of American society. Due to the fact that he has been brought up by a coevals that have. in some instances.

experient war first manus. he can merely conceive of that his abandonment will hold a significantly negative visual aspect in their eyes. In this regard. there were truly merely two options for a immature adult male placed in this state of affairs ; stay and accept the duties handed to him in the signifier of the bill of exchange card. therefore accomplishing societal blessing. or fire his bill of exchange card and flight over the boundary line to a new life.

behaving in a socially disapproving mode. In general footings. it was either ‘fight or flight’ .Tim O’Brien personally described it as a ‘schizophrenia’ of kinds. or a ‘moral split’ . This is summarized within “On the Rainy River” .

wherein he states. “I feared the war. yes. but I besides feared exile… I feared ridicule and animadversion. ”O’Brien has applied repeat of the word. ‘feared’ . in a Threefold Comparison of distinguishing thoughts. therefore showing the flawed logical thinking behind his traveling to war ; concluding that is flawed as a consequence of the gender stereotypes enforced by American society.

Ellipsis is besides applied so as to stand for his patterned advance of idea from fearing expatriate. to fearing ridicule and animadversion. The consequence of this is that the audience is one time once more provided with an penetration into O’Brien’s thought procedure. O’Brien frequently attempts to coerce the reader into sympathizing with himself. as it provides a medium through which one can hold on an apprehension of his wartime experiences. Additionally. the word “yes” is applied in this illustration. functioning to decrease the badness of the war by basically taking Tim O’Brien from his true emotion ego.

This is for the ground that if he does non admit his ain echt fright so in his head it is non-existent.However. what is so really upseting about this state of affairs is that the single belief system of O’Brien proves ineffective when it comes clip to make up one’s mind upon his unsure destiny. After all. there was still the legal option of registering as a painstaking dissenter in the US magistrate.

He had shown clear marks of legitimate moral confliction. But no. as concluded by Tim O’Brien himself. “It had nil to make with morality. Embarrassment. that’s all it was.

”In a determination that basically involves life and decease. for war does take lives. O’Brien placed his ballot in the class of decease because he would be excessively abashed non to. Within this extract.

the writer has intentionally distinguished the word ‘embarrassment’ through application of a comma. leting it to stand entirely in the reader’s caput before he submits the concluding statement. corroborating that it is this fright of ridicule entirely that causes a adult male to basically function up his life on a Ag platter for the US military. O’Brien would kill. and possibly decease because he was embarrassed non to in the clime of his society.

Furthermore. the capital ‘e’ straight after the lower instance ‘morality’ illustrates the overwhelming nature of the embarrassment. which in bend overrides and disguises the issue of morality. What this finally circulates back to is a stigma ; the stigma of the clip that was concerned with work forces being ‘real men’ . and non ‘damned sissies’ as the writer has so blatantly put it. O’Brien could non use as a painstaking dissenter because in his head and the remainder of societies. it would put him in the same class as any other bill of exchange evader.

be it by legal or illegal agencies.Some hindsight for those that are non familiar with this novel. the Rainy River in O’Brien’s.

“On the Rainy River” . chapter serves to stand for a symbol for the intersection in his life to which he has finally reached. Throughout the chapter O’Brien explains per se the gender stereotypes existent within American society. the societal effects of these stereotypes. and the exact consequence that they had on his ain character. It is a procedure of kinds.

and in the concluding section of the chapter. O’Brien is placed on the Rainy River and left to grip the footings of his realisation. That he will non take himself from these gender perceptual experiences. but will accept and encompass them. This is outlaid in O’Brien’s epiphany. “All I could make was call. And what was so sad.

I realized. was that Canada had become a pathetic phantasy. Silly and hopeless. It was no longer a possibility. I would non swim off from my hometown and my state and my life.

I would non be brave. ”O’Brien describes his evasive program as pathetic. It is a ‘pitiful fantasy’ . Interestingly. the words pathetic and phantasies have juxtaposing intensions. as the word pitiful is synonymous with judgement and ridicule. while fantasy alludes to a beginning of escape from judgement. Therefore the term.

‘pitiful fantasy’ is in fact an oxymoron. the consequence of which is enlightening of the fact that O’Brien’s ain belief system has been over powered by the male gender perceptual experiences that dominate society. While O’Brien knows in the deepest aspects of his sub-conscious that the Vietnam Campaign is innately incorrect. he remains on the boat. frozen by his fright of going a outcast.

Furthermore. O’Brien inserts the remarkable genitive signifier of “my” in a treble accretion:“I would non swim off from my hometown and my state and my life. I would non be brave. ”In this sentence. O’Brien’s hometown.

state and life combine as a symbol for his individuality. While O’Brien is cognizant that it is in his individuality that these negative stereotypes exist. he is unable to get away them. He is non courageous. Through usage of the remarkable genitive. Tim O’Brien is showing to the reader the ground why he. along with so many others. was unable to traverse the boundary line ; because by traversing the boundary line he was basically losing everything that he had come to cognize.

He was losing his individuality. Simply by stating this narrative. O’Brien is admiting that what he did was incorrectly. as he did non stand up for what he believed in. He allowed societies gender perceptual experience of males to command his decision-making and for that he is everlastingly ashamed. as demonstrated by his emotional dislocation. But why.

you ask. did a healthy adult male of his position kill other work forces in a war that he knew to be. by virtue. incorrect?It is for the ground that when all is said and done. as human existences.

what we want above all else is to suit in. The saddest truth of history is that those immature work forces that did traverse over the boundary line ne’er could suit back into the society that they had left behind. labeled “draft dodgers” by their ain friends and wise mans. As stated in the former. behaviour that subverts a stereotype can and will ensue in disapproval within the parametric quantities of what society deems acceptable. It is O’Brien’s inability to traverse the boundary line on that showery twenty-four hours. on the rainy river that acts as grounds for the blinding authorization that male gender functions domineered over immature receivers of the bill of exchange card in the sixtiess.

In shutting. the chapter. entitled “On the Rainy River” . of Tim O’Brien’s. “The Thingss They Carried” . provides a valuable penetration for the populace into the complications encountered by the immature work forces that received the bill of exchange card during the Vietnam War. As a receiving system of the bill of exchange card himself. O’Brien reveals the emotional and moral complications of a adult male that was told he had to travel to war by his authorities.

Within this intimate disclosure from his life experiences. O’Brien suggests that. for the bulk at least.

it was the gender stereotypes attached to males that provided the determinant factor for a immature receiver of the bill of exchange. These stereotypes. as formulated by the old coevals of work forces. created a rigorous position quo through which basically merely two options were provided: combat in a war that the adult male may or may non hold believed in. or get awaying across the boundary line to a new life. therefore going a outcast in his old one. While duty for the man’s determination did finally fall upon that adult male. it is incontestable.

as demonstrated by O’Brien’s personal conflictions. that the male gender functions of American society during the 1960s played a important function in the attack for enrolling soldiers into the Vietnam War.