The number one reason teenagers are different is that nformation travels first to Amygdala rather than the frontal lobe. The amygdala is the part of the brain that process emotional because of this and it goes through the emotional part first rather than the logical frontal lobe. Teenagers act more emotional than adults because the frontal lobe is not full developed So the amygdale has more Of a reaction in what teens do. 3. How much influence do “hormones” have on the teenager?
Is this claim worthy of discussion orover rated? What do you think? The amount of influence “hormones” have on teenageMs brain is unknown because there has not been full study on the effect that “hormones” have on the brain. 4. What is the relationship between risk taking and the teenage brain? Provide 3 statistics that you find concerning and that could be reduced in some way? 5. Should adolescents be forced to go to school before 10 am?
See if you can come up with a Reason. Adolescents should not be forced to go to school before 10am because adolescents require the most sleep but often get the least sleep. Also produce secrete melatonin which is a chemical that makes teens feel drowsy 1-3 hours later and makes teen drowsier in the morning. If school if moved back to loam and teenagers aren’t forced to get up earlier they would be less drowsy in school and would probably improve school marks. 6. So if adolescents are a work-in-progress in terms of judgment, should they be held accountable for their crimes in the same way adults are? Recent adolescent brain-development research was used in arguments against the juvenile death penalty in the IJnited States. If adolescents aren’t yet fully capable of controlling their emotional responses or understanding the consequences of heir actions, groups like the International Justice Project said, then they should not be punishable by death.
In March 2005, when the US Supreme Court finally abolished the juvenile death penalty, there were seventy-three people on death rows across the United States for crimes they had committed before the age of eighteen. Many brain researchers believe that science should be part of the debate. But, Giedd adds, “it becomes a very slippery slope: the same data that might support abolishing the juvenile death penalty could be used to take away teenagers’ ability to make their own eproductive-rights decisions. Knowing what you do about the development Of the teenage brain, select a side Of this issue and provide a detailed response as to what the Canadian criminal code should do to young offenders.