Last updated: August 30, 2019
Topic: BusinessCompany
Sample donated:

There are different models about
organizational justice include two factor model, three factor model and four
factor model, although most of the studies have been done based on three factor
model (e.g., DeConinck, 2010; Liljegren & Ekberg, 2010). Two factor model
which was proposed by Greenberg (1990) and supported by Sweeney and
McFarlin (1993) involves distributive and procedural justice. Four
factor model divides interactional justice to two sub-dimensions include
interpersonal and informational justice. Colquitt (2001) believed that
this model fit the data better than two other models. Another model introduced
by Byrne (1999) and colleagues (Byrne & Cropanzano, 2000) stated that
organizational justice is a multi-foci construct in which employees personalize
the organization and make differences between organizations fair treatment and
supervisor fair treatment.

Although, the aspects of justice are different, but
they are correlated to each other (DeConinck, 2010). Some meta-analysis studies
indicate that there are high correlations between distributive and procedural
justice (Colquitt et al, 2001; Hauenstein, McGonigle, & Flinder, 1997). Folger
and Cropanzano (2001) as the leading researchers in justice studies, emphasized
that the outcome, the interactions, and the procedure are all characteristics of
a single event, not essentially separate from each other and the interaction of
them affects people attitudes, emotions and behaviours (Holbrook, 1999). Consistent
with this idea, Cropanzano and Ambrose (2001) introduced the concept of
“Monistic Perspective,” which addresses a single event can be seen both a
process and outcome, depends on the context. They believe that we cannot see
them as the separate constructs, because fair procedures get most of their
importance from their beneficial outcomes.

Gold and Shaw (1998) believed that people show an
average of the three types of unfairness (i.e., an outcome, a procedure, or an
interaction) as the cause of a given problem instead of referring to just one
of them, indicating that a single focus is probably inadequate to reflect
reality. Interestingly, this high correlation of three dimensions have been
replicated in Parker and Kohlmeyer (2005) study.


behaviour in the organizations

During this 20 years, researches on unethical
behaviour in the organizations significantly have been increased (O’Fallon and
Butterfield 2005; Kish-Gephart et al. 2010). Particularly, after 2008 global
financial crisis we are seeing a huge academic and practical interests on
ethical studies in academic or business institutes (e.g., Kapner 2012; Schnebel
and Bienert 2004; Trevin˜o and Nelson 2004)

Variety and extension of the news about unethical
behaviours, regardless of the effect of media, in the financial sector,
business world, politics, and religion indicates that unethical behaviour is a
serious problem for organizations, economies, and society as a whole (see
Cropanzano and Stein 2009; De Cremer et al. 2010; Trevin˜o et al. 2006).

Most of the studies on ethical/unethical behaviour
have focused on two streams, the first stream is about unethical behaviours (stealing,
lying, cheating, and counterproductive work behaviour; e.g., Chang 1998;
Peterson 2002) and the second one is ethical behaviours that exceeds moral
minimums (e.g., whistle-blowing; Trevin˜o and Youngblood 1990). There is also a
third stream which is about ethical behaviours reliant on moral standards
(e.g., obeying the law; e.g., Wimbush et al. 1997).

Ethical behaviour is guided by the rules and codes of
conducts, which
are more right, fair and moral than bad (Beauchamp and Bowie, 2000; Brown et
al. 2005; Hunt
and Vitell, 1986; Lewis, 1985, p. 381). In the organizations, employees’
individual characteristics such as knowledge, values, attitudes and ethical
sensitivity and factors relevant to the organizational situation such as company’s
ethical climate and values within an ethical context, are believed to
contribute to ethical behaviour (Low et al., 2000; McClaren, 2000). Unethical behaviours
refers to those which violate moral norms accepted by a larger community such
as organization (Vardi and Weitz 2004; Velasquez 2005; Kaptein 2008). Unethical
behaviour in the organizations could be only counterproductive behaviours such
as theft (Greenberg 1990), but sometimes it is broader than a counterproductive
behaviour and it may bring harm (Marcus and Schuler, 2004; Fox et al. 2001; Thau, Aquino, &
Poortvliet, 2007). In spite of damaging the organization,
counterproductive behaviour is not always unethical (Kaptein 2008). For
instance, disobeying orders or stealing things from the organization to
evidence organizational corruption might be ethical and in line with the law (Jacobs,
Belschak & Den Hartog, 2014).