Two States By Andrew Hacker Essay, Research PaperBook Review-Two Nations by Andrew HackerIn Andrew Hacker & # 8217 ; s book, Two States, Hacker argues that inkinesss and Whites live in two different universes. He uses statistical grounds to turn out that the United States is a state of inequality, ill will, and segregation. Hacker uses a quotation mark from Benjamin Disraeli in the foreword that fundamentally sums up his full book,& # 8220 ; Two states, between whom there is no intercourse and no understanding ; who are as ignorant of each others wonts, ideas, and feelings, as if they were inhabitants in different zones, or dwellers of different planets.

& # 8221 ;This book reveals to all the existent dimensions of race and how it controls lives and divides society. Hacker analyzes race in every facet conceivable, such as political relations, instruction, and offense. He shows how those in power usage race as agencies of favoritism and domination.One issue Hacker addresses is Affirmative Action. I agree with his averment that Whites are afraid of it because they believe that & # 8220 ; it is enabling black America to be weak and subservient to the dictates of the society. & # 8221 ; However, Affirmative Action may be one of the few plans designed to assist inkinesss.I besides agreed with Hacker & # 8217 ; s impression that society dressed ores entirely on & # 8220 ; black offense, & # 8221 ; but so looks off in cases of & # 8220 ; white crime.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

& # 8221 ; By & # 8220 ; white offense & # 8221 ; , Hacker means non-violent offenses like peculation and & # 8220 ; black offenses & # 8221 ; are the violent offenses like slaying. Because society sees & # 8220 ; black offenses & # 8221 ; as more unsafe, they tend to disregard & # 8220 ; white crimes. & # 8221 ;Equally insightful as this book was, there was a great trade of things in it that I disagreed with. An issue brought up by Hacker that I disagree with is his perceptual experience that colza is a political act. Rape is an act of force, whether white males commit it or black males or the victim is white or black. Rape is a atrocious offense, politically motivated or non.I besides disagree with Hacker & # 8217 ; s belief that inkinesss have right to retribution because of the centuries they served as slaves. Please.

Hacker was ne’er a slave. I & # 8217 ; ve ne’er owned a slave. What right does Hacker hold in stating person like him deserves requital from person like me? Hacker should recognize that it is a new epoch, a new coevals. Our coevals shouldn & # 8217 ; Ts have to supply the black race with excess particular intervention merely because of what happened in the yesteryear.There was one subdivision in this book that truly touched a nervus. Hacker tends to believe that his race is the lone 1 that has suffered favoritism.

Hedismisses Hispanic and Asiatic favoritism as non so bad. He besides says that footings like “kike” and “spic” do non hold the same impact on a individual as the term “nigger.” Being Jewish, I find it rather raging that Hacker thinks he can reply for me by stating the term “kike” doesn’t hurt my feelings every bit much as the term “nigger” hurts his. The Jews have been discriminated against more than anyone can perchance grok. From the origin of the Nazi party in 1933, Jews were deprived of all their civil right, persecuted, imprisoned and murdered. Finally, they were herded into concentration cantonments in an effort to finally kill off them all. During World War II, the Nazis had killed 6 million Jews out of a population of 8 million.

Over the period of TWELVE YEARS 6 million Jews were murdered! Therefore, I believe that I have a interest to the claim of being a member of an cultural group that has seen its portion of favoritism.Hacker didn & # 8217 ; t sock the white race throughout he whole book. He besides suggested that most inkinesss support dual criterions that they condemn Whites for back uping. For illustration, Hacker said, & # 8220 ; most inkinesss find it acceptable to continue black colleges, yet they object if a school designates itself as white. & # 8221 ; He besides said that inkinesss would back up a black political campaigner merely because he is black. However, if a white individual ballots for a white campaigner, it is because they are racist.

Finally, Hacker ends the book with the inquiry, & # 8220 ; whom is responsible for all this? & # 8221 ; He says it is white America that made being a member of the black race so hard. He may be right and he may be incorrect by this. It is true that there is a degree of favoritism towards inkinesss, whether it is unequal wage criterions or the deficiency of political representation. He asks the inquiry, & # 8220 ; Is it right to enforce on members of an full race a lesser start in life, and so to anticipate from them a grade of declaration that has ne’er been demanded from your ain race? & # 8221 ; Well, of class the reply is no. But it besides isn & # 8217 ; t right to claim that everything in society is at that place for the exclusive intent of keeping back the black race, which is what I began to experience I was reading after a few chapters. Overall, I felt the book contained many good points, such as his perceptual experience of Affirmative Action. However, I was angry after completing because of some of his absurd claims. I.

e. his claim that other races have non suffered as terrible a degree of favoritism as the black race. Other than that, though, he did a applaudable occupation the stances he took on his issues. Hopefully, these issues will finally be resolved.