Last updated: February 17, 2019
Topic: EducationSchool
Sample donated:

Utilitarianism Or Kantianism Essay, Research Paper

Utilitarianism or Kantianism, Which theory of moralss is right?

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

In taking an ethical theory one must determine which is right to them

mentally because, To take one over the other must intend that you believe in

that one to the fullest extent. That? s why I believe the lone true Ethical

Theory in life? today? is Utilitarianism. The chief Utilitarian value is

felicity non for one individual but for all of society. Utilitarianism is a really

rational manner of idea, in which we consider all people as peers among


( I say today because, a theory is merely every bit good for every bit long as it last and no

one knows if a new theory will be discovered tomorrow. )

As all ethical theories, Utilitarianism is based on rights and wrongs of

human society. One rule of Utilitarianism is, the ultimate good ( terminal or

intent ) of human life is happiness, non merely of a individual person in

isolation from others, but of all persons together. This rule is really

of import because it starts many differences between people about what is good for

the bulk of a society.

Utilitarianism has many rules but for this paper I will merely be

discoursing a few of the major points, such as actions of rights and wrongs. What

makes an act right is its effects. ? Actions are right in proportion as

they tend to advance felicity, incorrect as they tend to bring forth the contrary of

happiness. ? How an action affects persons, whether it causes them

pleasances or hurting. One? s actions towards anything in life causes effects,

these effects are most of the clip overlooked by the action shaper, and its

consequences will be felt by others in the close hereafter.

The Utilitarian criterion is a societal criterion. What is right is non what

brings felicity to one, but what brings felicity to the bulk. Many of the

Utilitarian rules are geared to an about perfect universe for all of

humanity. This orientation towards a Utopia society is one of the major grounds

why I believe Utilitarianism will turn out to be the right theory of Ethical motives.

Utilitarianism is non without mistakes. One major point of this statement is

about felicity and good for the many as apposed to the few. Although we all

agree that felicity should be maximized for all, most of us can non hold on

what is happiness and what is good and who decided. Utilitarianism offers us a

little expression into this inquiry by saying that, what is good is what society

defines good to be. For illustration, No 1 would of all time differ that assisting person

is incorrect, but if assisting person shows your failing towards others most people

would see you as weak hearted.

Kantianism is another theory of moralss, which believes that a human life

can non be measured by measure. This position on moralss is really interesting to

see because it? s a one-eighty turn from Utilitarianism. In which we

notice that measure is a chief issue in life and its picks. Kantianism is

school of idea in which one life can non be compared to another or many more.

One rule of Kantianism is “ Act merely harmonizing to that axiom by

which you can at the same clip will that it should go a cosmopolitan jurisprudence. ”

This simple means that, one should make something that at the same clip if done to

you would be acceptable by you. This statement is right on a cardinal degree,

but we all know in life most people don & # 8217 ; t experience this manner about at that place picks,

they feel that they should make whatever convey them the most good.

Kantianism has a position of moralss that consist chiefly of person & # 8217 ; s purposes

instead than the effects. The good will factor is what Immanuel Kant argues

approximately. Suppose, A immature kid decides to hel

P an old lady with her bags, but in

hastiness to hotfoot up the stepss the immature kid spills the bags and breaks some of

the glass jars. Now the old lady is in entire desperation because all of her nutrient is

lost because the kid ran up the stepss. The older adult female doesn & # 8217 ; t halt to believe

that the kid had “ good purposes ” but decides to advise the kid & # 8217 ; s

parents and see to it that she is punished for her error. This is merely an

illustration of how people today see life & # 8217 ; s effects and non person & # 8217 ; s good


Kant proposes a really extremist manner of idea to our society today, and he

possibly right on the long tally but the common pattern today is Utilitarianism and

it & # 8217 ; s effect theory. Utilitarianism is used all around us today and over

history every bit good. The United States used this theory in its assault on Hiroshima,

Japan during World War II. They dropped an atomic bomb on Japan that they knew

was traveling to kill 100s of 1000s of people in a affair of proceedingss. This

act entirely was justified in America because it was calculated at being able to

stop the War and salvage the lives of 1000000s of Allied soldiers. The United States

sacrificed the few for the many. The United States had bad purposes on

dropping that bomb but the effects were good at the terminal because many more

lives were saved. Now I know that it & # 8217 ; s still incorrect and the United States could

hold approached Japan with an ultimatum, but that field might hold failed and

taken the lives of other Americans down with it.

The Utilitarian attack may hold been over putting to death but the fact that & # 8217 ; s at manus

is that the War came to a rapped terminal after the bomb was dropped in fright of

losing more lives. Kantianism would hold see this act as being incorrect because of

the decease at the terminal and would hold said that no 1 should judge the value of

many lives over the value of many other lives. Although the actions of the

United States against Japan were sad and slightly evil, the action was taken and

the United States of America is likely better away now with peace with Japan

even though it came at such a difficult monetary value.

Although Kantianism is mentally right it in pattern is a failure. Even the

most devoted Kantianist truster will sometimes tilt towards Utilitarianism when

the bets are placed on a higher platform. For illustration, Most people wouldn & # 8217 ; T

kill one individual to salvage three others, but would if it was to salvage three million

people. Like wise that such individual wouldn & # 8217 ; t kill one to salvage 10 people, but

would if those 10 people saved were apart of her household. Why is this? I believe

this exist because once the state of affairs alterations against them the individual sees life

in a personal manner and her rational head kicks-in. Once the individual knows the

determination will consequence her in private and personally, her Utilitarian idea rises

and flowers.

My penchant from the start has been in favour of Utilitarianism, because I

feel that Utilitarianism is the proper manner of idea in doing major determinations

that will consequence other people & # 8217 ; s life. Although Kantianism seems to be the proper

ethical theory, one must inquire himself, would you desire person to make the same to

you. By this I mean would desire another individual to make precisely what you have done.

I feel if you were to inquire most people this, they would likely react with a

smart reply or with no reply at all. My sentiment on this subject is one of admiration

because if some one doesn & # 8217 ; t believe in Utilitarianism, I feel she is being

absolutely midst headed non to see that Kantianism is incorrect if you don & # 8217 ; t support

all sides of it. Kantianism is good though, for little state of affairss as in day-to-day

life, but for major issues such as War, the lone manner to follow is