Utopia Essay, Research Paper

Positives and Negatives of the Utopian Society

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Sir Thomas More wrote a novel named Utopia about a state that existed merely in his head. More used the narrative to research his positions and feelings about political relations and authorities. Peoples still believe that the narrative holds truths that are relevant today even though More wrote Utopia during the Renaissance. Utopia contains information about More & # 8217 ; s vision of a perfect society. The Utopian authorities was able to get the better of or forestall all jobs confronting the state. The authorities foremost segregates the island by delving a canal around it so that the ocean will make and island that has risky heterosexuals as it & # 8217 ; s merely means into the island. It so handles the many facets that a community faces in a mode that, for the most portion, creates an gratifying environment to populate in. There are nevertheless a few points that I found a defect in. Personal wealth, faith, and justness are three countries of the Utopian society that have positive and negative sides.

The first country of the Utopian society that I found failing in is the deficiency of personal belongings. Every individual who could acquire up and work did so for six hours a twenty-four hours. Peoples were non allowed to be idle as it was against the jurisprudence. & # 8220 ; Actually their working hours are sufficient to supply non merely an copiousness, but a overabundance of all the necessities and comfortss of life & # 8221 ; ( p.35 ) . Since every individual contributes to the production of every nutrient or material merchandise in the commonwealth, there is no poorness and no greed. This construct looks great on paper. I feel, nevertheless, that this deficiency of having anything would do people to experience like they don & # 8217 ; t work for themselves. There would be no ground to labor over dirt that was hard to run up if you knew you were non traveling to hunger regardless of what you produced.

The following portion of Utopian civilization that I disagree with is its faith and the policy it has on vacations. The people are able to idolize any God they wish in anyhow they wished. . The people of Utopia are able to partake in any spiritual ceremonial they choose. Each citizen worships as he pleases and every bit long as he does non coerce his beliefs onto others he is all right ( p.70 ) . This freedom gave people a really of import right. It helped to stop many jobs that occurred during the early old ages of Utopia ( p. 72 ) . This policy is a brilliant thought and it surprised me that no 1 who really ran a state had thought of this. The lone defect that I found in Utopian faith was that all citizens had to the same temple at the same clip for the festival of the first and last yearss of the month. These yearss, called Cynemern and Trapermern, were celebrated in a common temple in the metropolis. The name of no specific God was used in the jubilation except Mithra. Since every religious order of faith used this name for their God. The authorities designed the services in this manner so that they would non pique any faith ( p.77 ) . The usage of no specific name of a God is a good manner to avoid piquing people, but it besides makes the ceremonial really impersonal.

It seems to me that it would hold been more good if each group of spiritual Utopians was able to idolize in the temple on their ain twenty-four hours. This manner they would be able to name their God anything they wanted and would experience surrounded by people with their same beliefs.

The concluding country with some facets is the Utopian justness system. The authorities does non hold many Torahs ; they do non see a demand for it. The Utopians see no demand in holding many Torahs when there is non adequate clip to pass to derive the apprehension for a larger figure. Actually, the Utopians feel that honouring good citizens as a better manner to develop ethical motives. Exposing the names of people who have done good for the commonwealth, is thought to be a good manner to detour others from moving against the common good. The Torahs that are made are really few and are made to implement the coveted moralss. If a jurisprudence is broken, the penalty is usually left to the caput of the household, a male, unless the offense is so bad that a public penalty would be better for the people of the metropolis ( p.60 ) . There are no criterions for the penalty harmonizing to the evil of the error, the senate decides on a instance by instance footing. In tribunal, people represent themselves. The worst felons are punished by bondage.

Peoples in bondage do the unsavory work of the community. They do non remain in prisons and their lone differentiations from citizens are a few physical and decorative differences. Even those punished by bondage are able to deliver themselves with difficult work and forbearance ( p. 59-61 ) . Using bondage for terrible offenses as opposed to capital penalty is a moral penalty. Bondsmen besides provide service to the state whereas if they were put to decease, no benefits would be received. However, the freedom they are given allows them the chance to jeopardize the populace once more. More Torahs and increased security of bondmans would make an environment safer for all Utopians.

There are many positive facets of the Utopian justness system. The most prevailing is the tribunal itself. Many instances are kept out of tribunal due to household penalty. With no attorneies, the judicial procedure is much quicker than today & # 8217 ; s tribunal system in America. The most negative portion of the justness system is the deficiency of Torahs. A society should modulate their people by regulations, non merely positive support. There should besides be ordinances of penalties for each offense. Without that there is ever a topographic point for unfairness. Officials should maintain convicted bondmans under a closer ticker and do them more seeable. These are the most barbarous felons in the state. The citizens should handle them as such for their ain safety.

The society in Utopia has positive and negative elements in faith, personal rights, and justness. With a few minor alterations, I feel that the negative could be eliminated. Utopia portrays facets of a community that is idealistic. However, the balance of good and bad parts creates a realistic, more come-at-able society.

More, Thomas. Utopia. Translated by H.V. S. Ogden ( Arlington Heights, 1949 ) .