Victor Frankl Essay, Research Paper
To grok the firm love of Victor Frankl, we mustunderstand his fortunes. There is no manner we can step into his places toexperience his calamities, but his graphic descriptions help us vicariously relivehis trial. He opens a window into his universe, and we can really see thescenes he paints for us. ? The accompanying guards kept shouting at us anddriving us with the butts of their rifles, ? he says ( 348 ) . It is hard to putourselves in his place of desperation. Bing forced to make things, in abominableconditions, against our will when our lives depend on it is non something we, as modern Americans, cognize much about. It may be more hard tounderstand how he keeps his hope alive. Frankl clings to the one thing even the Nazis could non take away fromhim. The love for his married woman was a bond even decease could non wipe out. ? Therewas no demand for me to cognize ; nil could touch the strength of my love, mythoughts, and the image of my beloved, ? Frankl writes ( 349 ) . I think it iswonderful how he can remember his married woman? s face amidst the pandemonium around him. Heexhibits great subject in a topographic point of devastation. He has an optimisticapproach to the adversities of the twenty-four hours. When the others are moping approximately, he still thinks about her. In add-on, his ideas take him off from anyphysical hurting he may be sing. Even though he is bereft, he has theability to float to another universe though his love ( 349 ) . What words can depict a love like Frankl? s? John Alan Lee writes atypology on different sorts of love. Looking at a few types, we can seequalities that qualify Frankl? s love. A touch of Eros is evident, because Frankl can retrieve what his married woman looks like. He describes hersmile and expression. ? Her expression was so more aglow than the Sun which wasbeginning to lift? ( Frankl 348 ) . Possibly when they foremost saw each other, there was a physical attractive force. It was likely non an infatuation withlooks, because he imagines a conversation with her. They had a really strongrelationship, so it is dissimilar to eros in that regard. Furthermore, itwould decidedly non hold ludic qualities that are more fugitive ( Lee302-303 ) . Storge love would most probably be the cupboard type to their love. Leedescribes falling into storgic love, ? with the transition of clip and theenjoyment of shared activities? ( 305 ) . He besides mentions how some peoplebased their love on friendly relationship and company. I believe this is the loveFrankl and his tungsten
ife felt when they were together. ? A adult male who has nothingleft in this universe still may cognize cloud nine, be it merely for a brief minute, in thecontemplation of his beloved? ( Frankl 348-349 ) . Even when they wereseparated from each other, it was a sweet love that Frankl had to acquire himthrough that incorrigible clip. Besides characterized by storgic love, is the unbelievable strength of thebond. Even when the lovers are apart from each other, it does non stressthe relationship every bit much as other types. Lee gives us the illustration ofUlysses and Penelope ( 305 ) . Even though Ulysses had non seen his married woman inten old ages and had been told she was dead, he still used all his strength toget back place. I am of the sentiment that Frankl? s love for his married woman was thisstrong. It did non count whether his married woman was dead or non. ? Had I knownthen that my married woman was dead, I think that I would still hold given myself, undisturbed by that cognition, to the contemplation of her image… ? ( Frankl349 ) . The love was genuinely admirable that they had for each other. At thesame clip, I do non believe their love was a passion. He did non experiencedespair from her absence ; alternatively, it gave him hope. However, if we throw in a spot of agape love, I think this well describesdifferent facets of Frankl? s great love for his married woman. Lee defines agape as, ? a generous, unselfish, giving of oneself? ( 309 ) . The fondness Frankl andhis married woman had for each other was likely like this. I can conceive of him doinglittle things around the house for her that showed how much he cared. Itwas surely a love they shared every bit. Finally, it would look to me Frankl? s baronial love was scarce. Working inthe cold ditches everyday must hold psychologically so physically killedmany work forces. Those who had no household had nil to trust for. They didn? thave an image or memory that could take them off from theirsurroundings. The lucky 1s that had married womans and kids could woolgather aboutbeing with them someday. Where would Frankl be if he did non hold hiswife? The griefs experienced by the people were genuinely tragic.Fortunately, Frankl had a love Death itself could non kill.
Works CitedFrankl, Victor. ? Love in a Concentration Camp. ? Reading, Writing, and the Humanities. Ed. JoRay McCuen and Anthony C. Winkler. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc. , 1991. 347-349.Lee, John A. ? The Styles of Loving. ? Reading, Writing, and the Humanities. Ed. JoRay McCuen and Anthony C. Winkler. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc. , 1991. 299-311.