Plants Essay, Research Paper
What the Mind is and How it Works
The first subdivision of this book addresses the inquiry whether or non the head really exists. Some believe the construct that because the head does non hold physical copiousness that it does non be at all. Bros goes on to state that & # 8220 ; If we mistake constructs for fact, we will go progressively nescient of world & # 8221 ; After this one would believe that the writer would travel on to explicate his position, nevertheless Bros does no such thing and instead leaves the issue hanging.
The book goes on to speak about abuses and how they affect our heads and organic structures. Abuses are non of physical copiousness but our head generates them and the effects occur within our organic structures and injury. Physical injury is controlled in our society and many times emphasized with. However mental injury is non controlled and the consequences are many a times looked down upon. Bros believes that there is no difference between a physical blow good aimed and a mental blow good aimed. The 1st crushes musculus and blood from the exterior, the 2nd from the interior. He besides believes that if there is a difference in grade between the two, it favors the first. The harm from a physical blow comes to an terminal when the physical impact ends. A mental blow reoccurs whenever we think back. Physical blows hurt! Mental blows maintain on pain.
The writer besides disagrees strongly with the belief that we use merely a fraction of our brain-in fact, he refers to it as absurd. He uses Darwin s theory as the footing of his statement. He states
that nature does non make a composite of tissue the size of the human encephalon so that we can use 1 % of it. I really much hold with Bros on this one.
The remainder of the book goes on to explicate Peter s theory on how our heads really work and what there maps are. Despite the large words and joging on, I still find much of this book really hard to get down because the writer makes no effort to explicate the grounds for his beliefs. He besides does non mention facts that backup any of his beliefs doing the remainder of the book sound much more like a clump of premises. Anyway, Bros goes on to state us his theory, stated as fact, of what our heads do. First our encephalon forms a image of world, nevertheless it can merely organize one image at a clip. Throughout each twenty-four hours our head signifiers back-to-back images of world either from events in our lives or either from callback. Our heads can besides organize images from callback of worlds that don t exist in world. And the last map is that it shops images of world for subsequently callback. The book so goes into farther account of these maps go forthing the reader either asleep or inquiring what in the heck he or she has merely read.
I, personally, did non bask this book in least sense of the word and did non experience I truly obtained anything from it. What Peter Bros wrote could hold been summarized in about a ten percent of what he made into a book. This authorship contains pages upon pages of useless information that nullifies the reader. On a graduated table from 1 to 10 I give this book a 4 merely because I m a generous cat.